Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Research Agency, France | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, monocentric, pathophysiological study, comparing 3 parallel groups: healthy controls; patients with diabetes and without DFU; patients with diabetes and with DFU. To address secondary objectives, samples from a fourth group will be collected.
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a common and serious complication of diabetes mellitus, and associated with major morbidity. Indeed, diabetes is the primary cause of non-traumatic lower-limb amputation, and the rise in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes worldwide increases the global burden of DFUs. The treatment of DFUs is particularly challenging. Besides etiologic measures, local therapy of foot ulcers mainly relies on debridement of the wound and dressings. Essential complementary measures include pressure off-loading and infection control. However, despite these treatments, complications are frequent, stressing the need for new treatments.
The microcirculation has a key role in tissue survival, and several classical pathways explain how hyperglycemia damages the microvessels. There is growing evidence that the PGI2 pathway is dysregulated in diabetes, which contributes to microvascular dysfunction. Besides its vasodilator effect, recent data has revealed the major role of PGI2 in angiogenesis. In the skin, such effect on healing might be enhanced by the role of PGI2 in the regulation of fibroblast and keratinocytes migration and proliferation.
In the past few decades, studies in diabetic patients with ulcers have shown numerous structural and functional abnormalities of the cutaneous microcirculation, supporting its critical role in the pathophysiology of DFUs. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction in the skin of diabetic patients remain largely unexplored in vivo. A better understanding of the specificities of microvascular changes in the diabetic foot is essential to developing new treatments for this pressing clinical need.
Objectives are
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 : healthy subject | Other | 15 healthy subject without diabetes |
|
| Group 2 : diabetes without ulcer | Other | 15 patients with diabetes type II and without foot ulcer |
|
| Group 3 : diabetes with ulcer active or <2 years | Other | 15 patients with diabetes type II and with foot ulcer (active or <2years) |
|
| Group 4 : Patients with type 2 diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower limb | Other | Patients with type 2 diabetes and neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower lunb surgery for skin ulcer |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microdialysis, current induced vasodilation | Diagnostic Test | CIV will be applied over all microdialysis fibers: one perfused with saline, one perfused with a preferential COX-1 blocker; and one perfused with a preferential COX-2 blocker. CIV will be applied over all fibers in the following conditions: one perfused with saline, one perfused with fluconazole and L-NMMA, and the last one perfused with lidocaine.Dialysate collection will be performed after each CIV: dermal PGI2 metabolite (6-ketoPGF1α) and other COX-dependent prostanoids or metabolite (e.g. 11-dehydroTXB2) will be collected in the dialysate fluid and quantified. One hour after the last condition, treprostinil will be perfused over all fibers. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Exploring PGI2 pathway in skin microvascular reactivity | Comparison of skin perfusion measured with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) on the calf, and expressed as arbitrary perfusion units, in response to local cathodal current application, between the three groups | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Involvement of COX-1 and 2 in cutaneous current-induced vasodilation | 1. Comparison of skin perfusion measured with LSCI on the calf, in response to local current application, during local infusion of ketorolac (COX-1 blocker), and meloxicam (COX-2 blocker), using skin microdialysis, between the three groups. | Day 1 |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Groups 1,2,3,4:
Group 1: healthy volunteers:
-Free from all acute and chronic pathology
Group 2: diabetic patients without DFU:
-Patients with type 2 diabetes according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), without DFU or history of DFU
Group 3: diabetic patients with DFU or recent history of DFU (occurred within the last two years):
-Patients with type 2 diabetes according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) with: One or more active grade 1A, 1C, 2A or 2C (University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot) foot ulcer of microvascular or mixed etiology; Or a recent history (<2 years) of foot ulcer of microvascular or mixed etiology.
Group 4 (to collect samples of foot skin biopsies to address secondary objectives ):
-Patients with type 2 diabetes according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA),with neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb surgery for skin ulcer (e.g. toe amputation).
Exclusion criteria
Groups 1, 2 and 3:
Groups 1,2,3 and 4:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alicia Guigui, pharmD, | Contact | +33-476-765-820 | aguigui@chu-grenoble.fr | |
| Matthieu Roustit, pharmD, PhD | Contact | +33-476-769-260 | MRoustit@chu-grenoble.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Grenoble Alpes Centre d'investigation clinique | Recruiting | Grenoble | 38000 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25617843 | Background | Knebel SM, Sprague RS, Stephenson AH. Prostacyclin receptor expression on platelets of humans with type 2 diabetes is inversely correlated with hemoglobin A1c levels. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2015 Jan-Mar;116-117:131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prostaglandins.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 21. | |
| 20827283 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data sending an e-mail to : jlcracowski@chu-grenoble.fr or mroustit@chu-grenoble.fr
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| D017719 | Diabetic Foot |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, monocentric, pathophysiological study, comparing 3 parallel groups: healthy controls; patients with diabetes and without DFU; patients with diabetes and with DFU. To address secondary objectives , samples from a fourth group (patients with diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb amputation) will be collected.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Skin biopsy | Diagnostic Test | Skin biopsy will be proposed. It will be performed on the internal superior calf (medial gastrocnemius), at a reasonable distance from the foot |
|
| peri-ulcerated skin biopsy | Diagnostic Test | Non-ulcerated skin from the peri-wound area will be collected. These patient will not undergo all the procedures included in this protocol. |
|
| Involvement of sensory nerves in cutaneous current-induced vasodilation |
2. Comparison of skin perfusion measured with LSCI on the calf, in response to local current application, after local infusion of lidocaine, between the three groups. |
| Day 1 |
| IP receptor function | 3. Comparison of skin perfusion measured with LSCI on the calf, in response to intradermal infusion of treprostinil using skin microdialysis, between the three groups. | Day 1 |
| Involvement of NO et EETs pathways in cutaneous current-induced vasodilation | 4. Comparison of skin perfusion measured with LSCI on the calf, in response to local current application, during local infusion of NG-Monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) and fluconazole using skin microdialysis, between the three groups. | Day 1 |
| Expression of different components of PGI2 pathway in the skin : PTGS1/2 | 5. Comparison of the expression of Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase (PTGS1/2 (COX1/2)), in the skin of the calf, between the three groups and a fourth group of foot skin biopsies from patients with diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb surgery. | Day 1 |
| Expression of different components of PGI2 pathway in the skin : PTGIS | 5. Comparison of the expression of PTGIS (CYP8A1) in the skin of the calf, between the three groups and a fourth group of foot skin biopsies from patients with diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb surgery. | Day 1 |
| Expression of different components of PGI2 pathway in the skin : PTGIR | 5. Comparison of the expression of PTGIR (IP-receptor) in the skin of the calf, between the three groups and a fourth group of foot skin biopsies from patients with diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb surgery. | Day 1 |
| Expression of different components of PGI2 pathway in the skin : TBXA2R | 5. Comparison of the expression of TXA2R (TP-receptor) in the skin of the calf, between the three groups and a fourth group of foot skin biopsies from patients with diabetes, neuropathy and DFU undergoing lower-limb surgery. | Day 1 |
| role of PGI2 pathway on cell migration in vitro | 6. Cell migration observed on wounded 3D skin equivalents made from cells collected from the three groups and from a fourth group of patients undergoing lower-limb surgery. Fibroblasts and kératinocytes migration on 3D reconstructed skin models. | Day 1 |
| Gohin S, Sigaudo-Roussel D, Conjard-Duplany A, Dubourg L, Saumet JL, Fromy B. What can current stimulation tell us about the vascular function of endogenous prostacyclin in healthy rat skin in vivo? J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Jan;131(1):237-44. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.267. Epub 2010 Sep 9. |
| 20805259 | Background | Gibbons CH, Freeman R, Veves A. Diabetic neuropathy: a cross-sectional study of the relationships among tests of neurophysiology. Diabetes Care. 2010 Dec;33(12):2629-34. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0763. Epub 2010 Aug 30. |
| 25843412 | Background | Hellmann M, Roustit M, Gaillard-Bigot F, Cracowski JL. Cutaneous iontophoresis of treprostinil, a prostacyclin analog, increases microvascular blood flux in diabetic malleolus area. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 Jul 5;758:123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.066. Epub 2015 Apr 3. |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D003925 | Diabetic Angiopathies |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016523 | Foot Ulcer |
| D007871 | Leg Ulcer |
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |