Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in reducing the impairment caused by endometriosis.
Endometriosis is a chronic disease in which endometrium-like (uterine lining-like) cells settle outside the uterus in the abdomen (Dunselman et al., 2014). The Endometriose Vereinigung Deutschland reports that between eight and 15 percent of all women during reproductive age are affected and that there are 40,000 new cases annually in Germany (Endometriose Vereinigung Deutschland e.V., 2020). Thus, endometriosis is the second most common gynecological disease. Despite the high prevalence, the etiology and pathogenesis of many factors remains unclear. Misdiagnoses are common and to reach the correct diagnosis it takes an average of 5 to 8.9 years (Chaman-Ara, Bahrami & Bahrami, 2017). So far there is no curative treatment option and the primarily medical treatment options are sometimes associated with serious side effects (Moradi, Parker, Sneddon, Lopez & Ellwood, 2014). Endometriosis is characterized by a multitude of physical as well as considerable psychological symptoms that significantly reduce the quality of life of those affected (Gao et al., 2006). For example, endometriosis is associated with higher levels of depression and anxiety disorders (Pope, Sharma, Sharma & Mazmanian, 2015). A psychotherapeutic supplement to the primary medical treatment to promote disease coping and expansion of coping strategies therefore appears sensible.
In the planned study, a CBT program specifically for endometriosis sufferers will therefore be developed and evaluated.
Previous intervention studies aimed at improving the quality of life of endometriosis sufferers examined mind-body interventions such as yoga (Gonçalves, Barros & Bahamondes, 2017), relaxation training (Zhao et al., 2012) and acupuncture in combination with conversational psychotherapy (Meissner et al., 2016). Hansen et al. (2017) were able to show in an uncontrolled pilot study (N = 10) that mindfulness-based psychotherapy significantly reduces the burden of endometriosis. Overall, the number of psychological intervention studies on endometriosis is very low and their quality often requires a critical classification due to methodological limitations (for an overview see Evans, Fernandez, Olive, Payne & Mikocka-Walus, 2019; Van Niekerk, Weaver-Pirie & Matthewson, 2019). Numerous evidence of effectiveness from the area of chronic pain disorders (Williams, Fisher, Hearn & Eccleston, 2020) as well as disorders in the area of women's health such as premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD, Weise et al., 2019) undermine a possible effectiveness of CBT in endometriosis. To the best of our knowledge, however, there is no study to date that has tested the effectiveness of CBT for improving the quality of life of endometriosis sufferers.
The treatment program developed as part of the planned study is to be implemented as an internet-based intervention. A large number of studies confirm the effectiveness of internet-based CBT (iCBT) in various mental (Loughnan, Joubert, Grierson, Andrews & Newby, 2019), psychosomatic (Andersson, Cuijpers, Carlbring, Riper & Hedman, 2014) and somatopsychic diseases (Bernardy, Füber, Köllner & Häuser, 2010). The iCBT has now established itself as being as effective as face-to-face therapy (Carlbring, Andersson, Cuijpers, Riper & Hedman-Lagerlöf, 2018; Andersson, Carlbring & Rozental, 2019)
The internet-based implementation in the present study has various advantages: On the one hand, the effectiveness of the iCBT can be checked efficiently and in a resource-saving manner (Hedman, Andersson, Ljoeétsson, Axelsson & Lekander, 2016). On the other hand, endometriosis sufferers can be addressed throughout the German-speaking area, which ensures that a sufficient sample size can be achieved. Ultimately, those affected that would otherwise not receive any treatment due to the lack of regional availability of interventions, also have access to treatment. In addition, issues such as the desire to have children and endometriosis often lead to shame. An intervention offered online and anonymously can encourage the use of assistance here.
The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness of iCBT in reducing the stress and impairment caused by endometriosis and in increasing the health-related quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy | Experimental | Internet-based CBT for patients with endometriosis: The experimental group has access to an online training consisting of 8 modules, one per week. Modules comprise of 1) psychoeducation (e.g., information about endometriosis and its treatment); 2) & 3) cognitive strategies (e.g., identifying and modifying dysfunctional cognitions); 4&5) pain and stress management (e.g. activity plans, relaxation techniques); 6) emotion regulation strategies (e.g. recognition and acceptance of emotions); 7) communication training (e.g. detection and communication of needs); 8) prophylaxis (e.g. summary of intervention, plans for the future). Participants are in weekly written contact with their assigned therapist via the news function of the training platform, receiving feedback on the content or getting answers to open questions. |
|
| Waiting list | Other | During the waiting period, patients receive no treatment. After a waiting time of 5 months, patients of the waitlist receive the same iCBT treatment as the experimental group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavioral psychotherapy | Behavioral | Internet-based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy aims to reduce the impairment due to endometriosis by using cognitive behavioural intervention techniques. Furthermore, therapy should enable the patients in coping with symptoms in the future. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Endometriosis Health Profile 30 + 23 (EHP-30 + 23; Jones, Kennedy, Barnard, Wong & Jenkinson, 2001) | Assessment of impairment of endometriosis-related quality of life (long version)(self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in Endometriosis Health Profile 5 (EHP-5; Jones, Jenkinson & Kennedy, 2004) | Assessment of impairment of endometriosis-related quality of life (short version)(self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), change from baseline weekly during treatment, change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start, change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in Pain Disability Index (PDI; Tait, Pollard & Margolis, 1987) | Assessment of impairment due to pain (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in Visual analog pain scale (VAS) | Assessment of impairment due to pain during menstruation and at the moment (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), change from baseline weekly during treatment, change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start, change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Brief Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Zipfel, Herzog & Löwe, 2004) | Assessment of depressive mood (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship Assessment Scale (RAS; Hendrick, 1988) | Assessment of quality of partnership (self-rating) | Pre-treatment |
| Big Five Inventory - 10 (BFI-10; Rammstedt & John, 2007) | Assessment of personality factors (self-rating) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Cornelia Weise, Ph.D | Philipps University Marburg | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philipps University Marburg, Dept. of Psychology, Division of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy | Marburg | Hesse | 35037 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27216151 | Background | Klein EM, Brahler E, Dreier M, Reinecke L, Muller KW, Schmutzer G, Wolfling K, Beutel ME. The German version of the Perceived Stress Scale - psychometric characteristics in a representative German community sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 23;16:159. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0875-9. | |
| 11506842 | Background | Jones G, Kennedy S, Barnard A, Wong J, Jenkinson C. Development of an endometriosis quality-of-life instrument: The Endometriosis Health Profile-30. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;98(2):258-64. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01433-8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Depends on the sample size. Patient data are highly sensible and anonymization might be threatened if the sample size is too small.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004715 | Endometriosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014850 | Waiting Lists |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001071 | Appointments and Schedules |
| D009934 | Organization and Administration |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
Wait list control group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Waiting list | Other | Participants of the waiting list receive no treatment for 5 months. Afterwards they receive the same treatment as the experimental group. |
|
| Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS; Klein et al., 2016) |
Assessment of perceived stress (self-rating) |
| Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in Brief Cope (Carver, 1997) | Assessment of coping skills (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R; Glattacker, Bengel & Jäckel, 2009) | Assessment of cognitive representation of illness (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Change in The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - II (FAH-II; Hoyer & Gloster, 2013) | Assessment of psychological flexibility (self-rating) | Pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (change from basline at 8-10 weeks after treatment start), change from baseline 3 month after treatment start, change from baseline 12 month after treatment start |
| Pre-treatment |
| Negative Effects of Psychological Treatment Questionnaire (NEQ; Rozental, Kottorp, Boettcher & Andersson, 2016) | Assessment of side effects of the intervention (self-rating) | Post-treatment (8-10 weeks after treatment start), 3-month-follow-up, 12-month-follow-up |
| Satisfaction with treatment (self developed questionnaire) | Assessment of satisfaction with treatment (self-rating) | Weekly during treatment, post-treatment (8-10 weeks after treatment start), 3-month-follow-up, 12-month-follow-up |
| Web-Based Screening Questionnaire (WSQ, Donker, Van Straten, Marks & Cuijpers, 2009) | Assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria | Screening (up to 4 weeks before treatment start) |
| International Diagnosis Checklist for International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) (IDCL; Hiller et al., 2004) | Telephone interview, assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria | Screening (up to 4 weeks before treatment start) |
| 15130031 | Background | Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5. Qual Life Res. 2004 Apr;13(3):695-704. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021321.48041.0e. |
| Background | Hoyer, J. & Gloster, A. T. (2013). Fragebögen und Skalen · Questionnaires and Scales Verhaltenstherapie 2013;23:42-44 Psychologische Flexibilität messen: Der Fragebogen zu Akzeptanz und Handeln II. https://doi.org/10.1159/000347040 |
| Background | Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430 |
| Background | Hiller, W., Zaudig, M. & Mombour, W. (2004). IDCL-Internationale Diagnosen Checklisten für DSM-IV und ICD-10 [Inter-national Diagnostic Checklists for DSM-IV and ICD-10] (Band 2). Bern: Huber. |
| Background | Hahlweg, K. (1979). Konstruktion und Validierung des Partnerschaftsfragebogen PFB. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 8(1). |
| Background | Glattacker, M., Bengel, J. & Jäckel, W. H. (2009). Die deutschsprachige Version des Illness Perception Questionnaire-revised: Psychometrische Evaluation an Patienten mit chronisch somatischen Erkrankungen. Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitspsychologie, 17(4), 158-169. Hogrefe Verlag Göttingen . https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.17.4.158 |
| 19632977 | Background | Donker T, van Straten A, Marks I, Cuijpers P. A brief Web-based screening questionnaire for common mental disorders: development and validation. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Jul 24;11(3):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1134. |
| 16250744 | Background | Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92-100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6. |
| Background | Rammstedt, B. & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 |
| 27331907 | Background | Rozental A, Kottorp A, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Carlbring P. Negative Effects of Psychological Treatments: An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Negative Effects Questionnaire for Monitoring and Reporting Adverse and Unwanted Events. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 22;11(6):e0157503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157503. eCollection 2016. |
| 3606368 | Background | Tait RC, Pollard CA, Margolis RB, Duckro PN, Krause SJ. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric and validity data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Jul;68(7):438-41. |
| Background | Zipfel, S., Herzog, W. & Löwe, B. (2004). Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem "Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)". Diagnostica, 50(4), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.171 |
| Background | Endometriose Vereinigung Deutschland e.V. (2020). Was ist Endometriose? Zugriff am 21.12.2020. Verfügbar unter: https://www.endometriose-vereinigung.de/was-ist-endometriose.html |
| 24435778 | Result | Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, Heikinheimo O, Horne AW, Kiesel L, Nap A, Prentice A, Saridogan E, Soriano D, Nelen W; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Mar;29(3):400-12. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det457. Epub 2014 Jan 15. |
| Result | Chaman-Ara, K., Bahrami, M. A. & Bahrami, E. (2017). Endometriosis psychological aspects: A literature review. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 9(2), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.5301/jeppd.5000276 |
| 25280500 | Result | Moradi M, Parker M, Sneddon A, Lopez V, Ellwood D. Impact of endometriosis on women's lives: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2014 Oct 4;14:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-123. |
| 16968582 | Result | Gao X, Yeh YC, Outley J, Simon J, Botteman M, Spalding J. Health-related quality of life burden of women with endometriosis: a literature review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1787-97. doi: 10.1185/030079906X121084. |
| 26629721 | Result | Pope CJ, Sharma V, Sharma S, Mazmanian D. A Systematic Review of the Association Between Psychiatric Disturbances and Endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1006-15. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30050-0. |
| 27869485 | Result | Goncalves AV, Barros NF, Bahamondes L. The Practice of Hatha Yoga for the Treatment of Pain Associated with Endometriosis. J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):45-52. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0343. Epub 2016 Nov 21. |
| 22455972 | Result | Zhao L, Wu H, Zhou X, Wang Q, Zhu W, Chen J. Effects of progressive muscular relaxation training on anxiety, depression and quality of life of endometriosis patients under gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jun;162(2):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Mar 26. |
| 27741200 | Result | Meissner K, Schweizer-Arau A, Limmer A, Preibisch C, Popovici RM, Lange I, de Oriol B, Beissner F. Psychotherapy With Somatosensory Stimulation for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1134-1142. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001691. |
| Result | Hansen, K. E., Kesmodel, U. S., Kold, M. & Forman, A. (2017). Long-term effects of mindfulness-based psychological intervention for coping with pain in endometriosis: A six-year follow-up on a pilot study. Nordic Psychology, 69(2), 100-109. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2016.1181562 |
| 31443810 | Result | Evans S, Fernandez S, Olive L, Payne LA, Mikocka-Walus A. Psychological and mind-body interventions for endometriosis: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2019 Sep;124:109756. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109756. Epub 2019 Jun 27. |
| 31081520 | Result | Van Niekerk L, Weaver-Pirie B, Matthewson M. Psychological interventions for endometriosis-related symptoms: a systematic review with narrative data synthesis. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Dec;22(6):723-735. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00972-6. Epub 2019 May 12. |
| 32794606 | Result | Williams ACC, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 12;8(8):CD007407. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007407.pub4. |
| 30783069 | Result | Weise C, Kaiser G, Janda C, Kues JN, Andersson G, Strahler J, Kleinstauber M. Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioural Intervention for Women with Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(1):16-29. doi: 10.1159/000496237. Epub 2019 Feb 19. |
| 31101993 | Result | Loughnan SA, Joubert AE, Grierson A, Andrews G, Newby JM. Internet-delivered psychological interventions for clinical anxiety and depression in perinatal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Dec;22(6):737-750. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00961-9. Epub 2019 May 17. |
| 25273302 | Result | Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Carlbring P, Riper H, Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):288-95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20151. |
| 20682676 | Result | Bernardy K, Fuber N, Kollner V, Hauser W. Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome - a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2010 Oct;37(10):1991-2005. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100104. Epub 2010 Aug 3. |
| 31708813 | Result | Andersson G, Carlbring P, Rozental A. Response and Remission Rates in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 25;10:749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00749. eCollection 2019. |
| 29215315 | Result | Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7. |
| 27113231 | Result | Hedman E, Andersson E, Ljotsson B, Axelsson E, Lekander M. Cost effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy and behavioural stress management for severe health anxiety. BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 25;6(4):e009327. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009327. |
| 35414092 | Derived | Schubert K, Lohse J, Kalder M, Ziller V, Weise C. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for improving health-related quality of life in patients with endometriosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06204-0. |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |