Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Preliminary data in chronic back pain patients showed no benefits of the treatment; we did not further pursue the same treatment in osteoarthritis patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study the investigators aim to examine the effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on hippocampal network connectivity and pain levels in individuals with pain due to knee osteoarthritis.
Osteoarthritis (OA) pain is one of the most prevalent causes of chronic pain worldwide. Symptoms can last from months to a lifetime, severely impacting patients' quality of life. New strategies - including non-invasive brain stimulation techniques - have shown promise for sustained pain relief, yet evidence on their reliability and efficacy is limited. Apkarian et. al have previously shown that the dorsal hippocampus plays a central role in pain analgesia; thus, the study aim is to test whether non-invasively enhancing dorsal hippocampus activity is a useful new strategy for pain relief in knee OA patients. This study will recruit 35 patients with chronic OA pain for > 6 months. Each participant will receive 3 rounds of different treatment modalities in a cross-over manner. Each treatment modality will consist of 5 daily consecutive rTMS sessions followed by a 2-weeks wash-out period. Questionnaires will be completed prior to and following each intervention, and after each treatment round. Participants will be trained to use a pain electronic application (smartphone-based tool to rate pain intensity and mood on NRS scales, as well as indicate rescue medication use, developed in our lab). They will be asked to use this application for 7-10 days prior to the first round of intervention and during the study duration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stimulation Modality 1 | Experimental | Repetitive TMS will be applied at 100% resting motor threshold intensity to a region of interest located in the parietal cortex, that will be determined based on its connectivity with the hippocampus. |
|
| Stimulation Modality 2 | Sham Comparator | Parameters will be identical to the modality 1, except that the coil will be flipped over. |
|
| Stimulation Modality 3 | Active Comparator | The stimulation will be delivered over the motor cortex contralateral to the predominant painful region, i.e., right motor cortex stimulation if left knee pain. The stimulation intensity will be set at 80% of the resting motor threshold. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Device | The brain stimulation can be delivery using different devices; in this project a MagPro X100 stimulator connected to a MagPro Cool-B65 liquid-cooled butterfly coil (MagVenture A/S, Farum, Denmark) will be used. Resting motor threshold (M1-rTMS) will be determined during the visit 1 or visit 2 and used along all visits. The rTMS pulse sequences and intensities used are all within the published safety guidelines |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain ratings (Numeric Rating Scale) | The primary efficacy outcomes are the effects of the rTMS modalities on pain app ratings. | Pain ratings immediately after each rTMS modality and effects after the end of stimulation round (1 week). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain trajectories | Individual pain trajectories will be analyzed to assess rTMS effects with greater temporal granularity. | 1 to 12 weeks (end of the study) |
| Brain biomarkers and psychological indicators of rTMS effects and pain relief |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
All participants will receive all the 3 modalities of stimulation in a randomized order. Each round is composed by 5 daily sessions of stimulation. Participants will have a second MRI only after Modality one (hippocampal).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Test for objective mechanistic brain correlates (using functional magnetic resonance imaging - fMRI) for treatment efficacy. Specific regions of interest (ROI) involved in the hippocampal network will be studied.
| 1 to 12 weeks (end of the study) |
| Adverse events | Incidence of adverse events will be reported for after each rTMS session.The frequency and severity of adverse effects will be compared between each rTMS modality. | 1 to 12 weeks (end of the study) |
| Global impression of change | Global impression of change (PGIC): this questionnaire reflects a patient's belief about the efficacy of treatment. Although widely used in chronic pain clinical trials, PGIC's validity has not been formally assessed. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. | 1 to 12 weeks - after each rTMS round. |