Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Beijing Municipal Education Commission | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Gut microbiota was found to play a causal role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Probiotics were shown to have a potential anti-hypertensive effect in human/rodent studies. This study aims to explore the effect, safety, and underlying mechanisms of the combination of probiotics, containing 10 strains from Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, on hypertension, compared with placebo.
Background: Primary hypertension is the leading risk factor of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality, and contributes to severe global health burden. Emerging evidence has shown a close association between gut microbiota and hypertension. Fecal transplantation from hypertensive patients/animals to germ-free mice caused elevation of blood pressure, indicating a causal role of gut dysbiosis in hypertension. Probiotics were found to have a potential anti-hypertensive effect in both human and rodent studies. Based on the investigators' previous findings of metagenomics analysis of hypertensive, prehypertensive patients and healthy control, hypertensive and prehypertensive patients were lack of probiotics. Therefore, the investigators developed this study to explore the effect, safety, and underlying mechanisms of the combination of probiotics, containing 10 strains from Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, on hypertension, compared with placebo.
Objective: To explore the effect, safety, and underlying mechanisms of the combination of probiotics on grade 1 primary hypertension and prehypertension.
Study Design: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study.
Data quality control and statistical analysis: The investigators have invited professional statistic analysts to assist in analyzing data and a third party to supervise data quality.
Ethics: The Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital approved this study. Informed consent before patient enrollment is required.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic powder | Experimental | The probiotic powder contains 10 strains from Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genus. Participants will orally take two sachets daily and last for 8 weeks. |
|
| Placebo powder | Placebo Comparator | The placebo powder consists of maltodextrin and contains no probiotics. Participants will orally take two sachets daily and last for 8 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic powder | Biological | Probiotic powder containing 10 strains from Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genus. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | Change in Office Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) | From baseline to day 56 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Office SBP | Change in Office SBP | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) | Change in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| JUN CAI | Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fu Wai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100037 | China | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28143587 | Background | Li J, Zhao F, Wang Y, Chen J, Tao J, Tian G, Wu S, Liu W, Cui Q, Geng B, Zhang W, Weldon R, Auguste K, Yang L, Liu X, Chen L, Yang X, Zhu B, Cai J. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome. 2017 Feb 1;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0222-x. | |
| 29143823 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006973 | Hypertension |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo powder | Biological | Placebo powder containing maltodextrin and no probiotics. |
|
| Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in daytime average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in daytime average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in daytime average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in daytime average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in nightime average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in nightime average SBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in nightime average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Change in nightime average DBP via 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety | Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Changes in Intestinal Microbiota Composition Pre- and Post-intervention via Metagenomic Analysis | Intestinal microbiota composition is obtained through sequencing of DNAs from feces samples and bioinformatic analysis. Changes in the intestinal microbiota composition before and after intervention (probiotics or placebo) is defined as a secondary outcome. This is stratified by: 1. Randomization (probiotics or placebo); 2. Changes in office SBP. | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Changes in Intestinal Microbiota Function Pre- and Post-intervention via Metagenomic Analysis | Intestinal microbiota function is obtained through sequencing of DNAs from feces samples and bioinformatic analysis according to functions related to detected genes. Changes in the intestinal microbiota function before and after intervention (probiotics or placebo) is defined as a secondary outcome. This is stratified by: 1. Randomization (probiotics or placebo); 2. Changes in office SBP. | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Changes in Intestinal Metabolite Composition Pre- and Post-intervention via Metabolomic Analysis | Metabolomics analysis is a quantitative analysis of all metabolites in the sample. Metabolites in feces are detected using liquid or gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, and the composition and abundance of each metabolite are obtained. Changes in the intestinal metabolite composition before and after intervention (probiotics or placebo) is defined as a secondary outcome. This is stratified by: 1. Randomization (probiotics or placebo); 2. Changes in office SBP. Randomisation Change in Office SBP | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Changes in Serum Metabolite Composition Pre- and Post-intervention via Metabolomic Analysis | Metabolomics analysis is a quantitative analysis of all metabolites in the sample. Metabolites in serum are detected using liquid or gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry, and the composition and abundance of each metabolite are obtained. Changes in the serum metabolite composition before and after intervention (probiotics or placebo) is defined as a secondary outcome. This is stratified by: 1. Randomization (probiotics or placebo); 2. Changes in office SBP. Randomisation Change in Office SBP | Baseline, Day28, Day 56, Day 84 |
| Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Level | Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Level | Baseline, Day 56 |
| Change in Blood Lipid Level (Total Cholesterol, Total Triglyceride, Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) | Change in Blood Lipid Level (Total Cholesterol, Total Triglyceride, Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol) | Baseline, Day 56 |
| Change in Blood Uric Acid | Change in Blood Uric Acid | Baseline, Day 56 |
| Change in Body Mass Index | Change in Body Mass Index | Baseline, Day 56 |
| Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen |
| Shenzhen |
| Guangdong |
| 518000 |
| China |
| Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University | Wuhan | Hubei | 430000 | China |
| The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical Collage | Baotou | Neimenggu | 014000 | China |
| Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200000 | China |
| Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital | Chengdu | Sichuan | 610000 | China |
| Wilck N, Matus MG, Kearney SM, Olesen SW, Forslund K, Bartolomaeus H, Haase S, Mahler A, Balogh A, Marko L, Vvedenskaya O, Kleiner FH, Tsvetkov D, Klug L, Costea PI, Sunagawa S, Maier L, Rakova N, Schatz V, Neubert P, Fratzer C, Krannich A, Gollasch M, Grohme DA, Corte-Real BF, Gerlach RG, Basic M, Typas A, Wu C, Titze JM, Jantsch J, Boschmann M, Dechend R, Kleinewietfeld M, Kempa S, Bork P, Linker RA, Alm EJ, Muller DN. Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates TH17 axis and disease. Nature. 2017 Nov 30;551(7682):585-589. doi: 10.1038/nature24628. Epub 2017 Nov 15. |
| 31953983 | Background | Robles-Vera I, Toral M, de la Visitacion N, Sanchez M, Gomez-Guzman M, Romero M, Yang T, Izquierdo-Garcia JL, Jimenez R, Ruiz-Cabello J, Guerra-Hernandez E, Raizada MK, Perez-Vizcaino F, Duarte J. Probiotics Prevent Dysbiosis and the Rise in Blood Pressure in Genetic Hypertension: Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2020 Mar;64(6):e1900616. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900616. Epub 2020 Feb 6. |
| 25047574 | Background | Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R. Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2014 Oct;64(4):897-903. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03469. Epub 2014 Jul 21. |