Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the this study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a fluoroscopically-guided dorsal ramus block placed by the operative neurosurgeon prior to lumbosacral surgery. The study will consist of a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who underwent lumbosacral surgery patients between June 2018 and March 2021 with or without a preoperative fluoroscopically-guided dorsal ramus (DR) block placed by the operative neurosurgeon.
Spine surgery poses unique challenges in postoperative pain management. Local anesthetic blocks, namely the erector spinae plane and thoracolumbar interfacial plane blocks, placed by anesthesia under ultrasound guidance have been shown to reduce postoperative pain after spinal surgery and decrease perioperative opioid requirements by as much as 50%. Nonetheless these procedures are not routinely performed, likely due to logistical hurdles and lack of widespread knowledge of the procedure by anesthesiologists. A preoperative dorsal ramus block performed by the operative neurosurgeon under fluoroscopy shows promise as an alternative approach to perioperative pain control. The objective of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a dorsal ramus block block performed by a neurosurgeon under x-ray guidance prior to lumbar surgery. The study will include a cohort of patients who have undergone lumbar spine surgery with or without the x-ray guided dorsal ramus block. A retrospective chart review of these patients will be performed to assess for postoperative pain control, postoperative opioid requirements, time to block completion, length of stay, and adverse events. Descriptive and comparative statistics will be performed. No new data will be gathered from the subjects beyond pre-existing data within the medical record, and no new procedures will be performed as part of the study. If the current study suggests that a dorsal ramus block performed by the operative neurosurgeon is feasible, safe, and effective, it will serve as a foundation for a randomized clinical trial of such a block among patients undergoing lumbar surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lumbar spine surgery with preoperative fluoroscopically-guided DR block | Patients who have undergone lumbar spine surgery with a fluoroscopically-guided DR block placed by the operative neurosurgeon prior to surgery. These patients subsequently received standard of care general anesthesia and standard multimodality postoperative pain control. |
| |
| Lumbar spine surgery without preoperative fluoroscopically-guided DR block | Patients who have undergone lumbar spine surgery without placement of a fluoroscopically-guided DR block. These patients received standard of care general anesthesia and standard multimodality postoperative pain control. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative fluoroscopically-guided dorsal ramus block placed by the operative neurosurgeon | Procedure | Patients received bupivicaine injections delivered via 22-gauge spinal needle to the junction of the facet and transverse process or ala at multiple spinal levels (2.5-5 cc per injection of 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| First visual analog scale (VAS) pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) | The first VAS pain score recorded within the PACU on a 0-10 scale, with 0 indicating no pain (better outcome) and 10 indicating more pain (worse outcome). | Within the first 24 hours of surgery |
| Total PACU opioid requirements | Total opioids received within the PACU prior to discharge home or transfer to floor (oral morphine equivalents) | Within the first 24 hours of surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time required to perform block (in minutes) | Among patients who received DR block, total procedure time required to perform the block, intraoperatively. | Up to 30 minutes from start of DR block placement |
| Length of Stay (in hours to days) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The population consists of a convenience sample of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery at a tertiary care academic medical center and an associated specialized spine hospital.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christoper E. Mandigo, MD | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia University Irving Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D007405 | Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Total time in hospital from end of surgery to discharge
| Up to 30 days from completion of surgery during hospital course |
| Total number of adverse events | Adverse cardiovascular events (hypotension, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest), adverse neurological events (unexpected neurological deficit, seizures, changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring) | Up to 24 hours from start of DR block placement |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |