Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Iaso Maternity Hospital, Athens, Greece | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hypothesis: the combined use of progesterone administration for luteal phase support is superior to the single route of progesterone administration in terms of pregnancy outcome parameters in women undergoing fresh IVF/ICSI cycles.
In ART (IVF/ICSI), most of the studies have shown a deficiency of progesterone during the luteal phase, especially due to the use of GnRH analogs. The lack of progesterone leads to abnormal endometrial development and consequently to desynchronization between the latter and the blastocyst implantation. Therefore, it is a standard of care to use progesterone for luteal phase support after embryo transfer and during the first trimester, in case of pregnancy.
According to ESHRE guidelines, either of vaginal, oral, subcutaneous or intramuscular route is advisable.
But, until now, there is no robust evidence on the effect on pregnancy outcome of the combined route of progesterone administration compared to the standard of care (single route).
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the combined route of progesterone administration to the single route.
The study is a prospective cohort study. Participants will receive either standard treatment with single route (vaginal) progesterone administration according to the ESHRE guidelines, or combination of more than one routes of administration, that is vaginal plus oral or subcutaneous progesterone, starting afterthe fresh embryo transfer until 12 weeks of gestation or a negative pregnancy test.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| combined progesterone group | patients will receive vaginal plus subcutaneous or per os progesterone |
| |
| Vaginal progesterone group | patients will receive vaginal progesterone |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utrogestan | Drug | PROSPECTIVE STUDY |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Live birth rate | The percentage of viable embryo after 20 weeks of gestation | 9 months] |
| Abortion rate | Loss of pregnancy up to 20 weeks of gestation | 20 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Infertile couples with an indication for IVF/ICSI (both Units).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vasiliki Dourou | Contact | +306977706799 | vdourou@gmail.com | |
| Nikolaos Vlachos | Contact | nfvlahos@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nikolaos Vlachos | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National and Kapodistrian University of Athens | Recruiting | Athens | Attica | 11528 | Greece |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26148507 | Background | van der Linden M, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, Kremer JA, Metwally M. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 7;2015(7):CD009154. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009154.pub3. | |
| 18406835 | Background | Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Progesterone supplementation during the luteal phase and in early pregnancy in the treatment of infertility: an educational bulletin. Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):789-92. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.012. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000624167 | Utrogestan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 32585391 | Background | Pabuccu E, Pabuccu R, Gurgan T, Tavmergen E. Luteal phase support in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Jun 22:101838. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101838. Online ahead of print. |
| 28333318 | Background | Tournaye H, Sukhikh GT, Kahler E, Griesinger G. A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023. |
| 25100106 | Background | Baker VL, Jones CA, Doody K, Foulk R, Yee B, Adamson GD, Cometti B, DeVane G, Hubert G, Trevisan S, Hoehler F, Jones C, Soules M. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2212-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu194. Epub 2014 Aug 6. |
| 31032676 | Background | Tomic V, Kasum M, Vucic K. The role of luteal support during IVF: a qualitative systematic review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Oct;35(10):829-834. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2019.1603288. Epub 2019 Apr 29. |
| 30304457 | Background | Griesinger G, Blockeel C, Sukhikh GT, Patki A, Dhorepatil B, Yang DZ, Chen ZJ, Kahler E, Pexman-Fieth C, Tournaye H. Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2212-2221. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey306. |