Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| H0P-MC-BP02 | Other Identifier | Eli Lilly and Company |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test whether LY3526318 is efficacious and safe in relieving chronic low back pain (CLBP). This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292) which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LY3526318 | Experimental | Participants received 250 mg of LY3526318 orally, once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment period and were switched to placebo once daily for the next 4 weeks of the treatment period. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LY3526318 | Drug | Administered orally |
| |
| Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4 | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or (1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) | Eli Lilly and Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synexus- Chandler | Chandler | Arizona | 85224 | United States | ||
| Synexus Clinical Research - Glendale |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3526318 in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain | View source |
Not provided
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and European Union (EU), whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 250 Milligram (mg) LY3526318 | Participants received 250 mg of LY3526318 orally, once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment period and were switched to placebo once daily for the next 4 weeks of the treatment period. |
| FG001 | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 10, 2021 | Aug 11, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
Administered orally |
|
| Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | The RMDQ is a simple, sensitive, and reliable method to measure disability in patients with back pain that consists of 24 statements relating to the person's perceptions of back pain and associated disability based on physical ability/activity, sleep/rest, psychosocial, household management, eating, and pain frequency. Participants are asked if they feel the statement is descriptive of their own circumstance on that day. The total score is obtained by counting the number of ''Yes'' responses, ranging from: 0 = no disability to 24 = maximal disability. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | The RMDQ is a simple, sensitive, and reliable method to measure disability in patients with back pain that consists of 24 statements relating to the person's perceptions of back pain and associated disability based on physical ability/activity, sleep/rest, psychosocial, household management, eating, and pain frequency. Participants are asked if they feel the statement is descriptive of their own circumstance on that day. The total score is obtained by counting the number of ''Yes'' responses, ranging from: 0 = no disability to 24 = maximal disability. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline for Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patients Global Impression of Change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7 where, 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse. Posterior mean, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline for Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patients Global Impression of Change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0=no pain, and 100=worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0=no pain, and 100=worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Baseline, Week 8 |
| Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Week 4 |
| Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | Week 8 |
| Glendale |
| Arizona |
| 85306 |
| United States |
| Alliance for Multispecialty Research, LLC Tempe | Tempe | Arizona | 85281 | United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | Riverside | California | 92503 | United States |
| Artemis Institute for Clinical Research | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| CMR of Greater New Haven | Hamden | Connecticut | 06517 | United States |
| VIN-Julie Schwartzbard | Aventura | Florida | 33180 | United States |
| Suncoast Research Group | Miami | Florida | 33135 | United States |
| New Horizon Research Center | Miami | Florida | 33165 | United States |
| Renstar Medical Research | Ocala | Florida | 34470 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33781 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | The Villages | Florida | 32162 | United States |
| Rocky Mountain Clinical Research | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | Chicago | Illinois | 60602 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Boston Clinical Trials | Boston | Massachusetts | 02131 | United States |
| ActivMed Practices and Research | Methuen | Massachusetts | 01844 | United States |
| MedVadis Research Corporation | Waltham | Massachusetts | 02451 | United States |
| Great Lakes Research Group, Inc. | Bay City | Michigan | 48706 | United States |
| StudyMetrix Research | City of Saint Peters | Missouri | 63303 | United States |
| Clinvest Research LLC | Springfield | Missouri | 65807 | United States |
| Synexus - Cincinnati | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45236 | United States |
| META Medical Research Institute | Dayton | Ohio | 45432 | United States |
| Altoona Center For Clinical Research | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | 16635 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| Synexus - US | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Northwest Clinical Research Center | Bellevue | Washington | 98007 | United States |
| Rainier Clinical Research Center | Renton | Washington | 98057 | United States |
| Ponce Medical School Foundation Inc. | Ponce | 00716 | Puerto Rico |
| Latin Clinical Trial Center | San Juan | 00909 | Puerto Rico |
Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
| Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug (Safety Population Week 1-4) |
|
| Safety Population Week 5-8 | All participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and who did not discontinue at or prior to week 4. |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All enrolled or randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 250 mg LY3526318 | Participants received 250 mg of LY3526318 orally, once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment period and were switched to placebo once daily for the next 4 weeks of the treatment period. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4 | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | The RMDQ is a simple, sensitive, and reliable method to measure disability in patients with back pain that consists of 24 statements relating to the person's perceptions of back pain and associated disability based on physical ability/activity, sleep/rest, psychosocial, household management, eating, and pain frequency. Participants are asked if they feel the statement is descriptive of their own circumstance on that day. The total score is obtained by counting the number of ''Yes'' responses, ranging from: 0 = no disability to 24 = maximal disability. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) | The RMDQ is a simple, sensitive, and reliable method to measure disability in patients with back pain that consists of 24 statements relating to the person's perceptions of back pain and associated disability based on physical ability/activity, sleep/rest, psychosocial, household management, eating, and pain frequency. Participants are asked if they feel the statement is descriptive of their own circumstance on that day. The total score is obtained by counting the number of ''Yes'' responses, ranging from: 0 = no disability to 24 = maximal disability. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patients Global Impression of Change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7 where, 1=very much better, and 7=very much worse. Posterior mean, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change | Patients Global Impression of Change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS | The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0=no pain, and 100=worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain | VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0=no pain, and 100=worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Hours per night | Baseline, Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep | The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Hours per night | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm) | The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 4. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mg per day (mg/day) | Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage | Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval. | All enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. Here, the overall number of participants analyzed includes the number of participants with non-missing value at Week 8. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mg per day (mg/day) | Week 8 |
|
|
Baseline through Week 8
All participants under the safety population for week 1-4 and week 5-8. Gender specific events only occurring in male or female participants have had the number of participants at Risk adjusted accordingly.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 250 mg LY3526318 Week 1 to 4 | Participants received 250 mg of LY3526318 orally, once daily for the first 4 weeks of treatment period (Week 1-4). | 0 | 105 | 2 | 105 | 36 | 105 |
| EG001 | 250 mg LY3526318/Placebo Week 5 to 8 | Participants who received 250 mg of LY3526318 in the first 4 weeks were switched to receive placebo once daily for the next 4 weeks of the treatment period (Week 5-8). | 0 | 92 | 0 | 92 | 14 | 92 |
| EG002 | Placebo Week 1 to 4 | Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for week 1 to 4 of treatment period. | 0 | 54 | 0 | 54 | 19 | 54 |
| EG003 | Placebo Week 5 to 8 | Participant from Week 1-4 continued to receive placebo orally, once daily, for week 5 to 8 of treatment period. | 0 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 5 | 50 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Heavy menstrual bleeding | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distentation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Frequent bowel movements | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lip swelling | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Balance disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Restless legs syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tension headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Concussion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dental restoration failure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaccination complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal discharge*a | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Glucose tolerance impaired | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertriglyceridaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Immunisation reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seasonal allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| SARS-CoV-2 test positive | Investigations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract operation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wisdom teeth removal | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoacusis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Photopsia | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma muscle | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Facial bones fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle strain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nerve compression | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatobiliary scan abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Eli Lilly and Company | 800-545-5979 | ClinicalTrials.gov@lilly.com |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 1, 2022 | Aug 11, 2023 | SAP_003.pdf |
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
|
|
|
Participants received placebo orally, once daily, for 8-weeks treatment period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|