Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| FinTofUC | Other Identifier | Alias Study Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to describe and evaluate clinical outcomes, treatment lines, and to identify the key characteristics of the patients treated with tofacitinib.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients treated with Tofacitinib | Patients treated with tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis in Finland. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Age at the Time of Diagnosis | Participant's age at the time of ulcerative colitis diagnosis was presented in this outcome measure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | At diagnosis (anytime between Jan 2010 and Dec-2021, approximately 12 years (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Duration of Ulcerative Colitis | Duration of ulcerative colitis was presented in this outcome measure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Number of Participants With Extent of Colonic Involvement According to the Montreal Classification | Montreal classification was used to classify UC based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for UC. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Mayo Score at Initiation of Tofacitinib | Mayo score was composed of four components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician (doctors) assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. Mayo scores and sub-scores have been collected by doctors independently as part of standard of care. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Received Tofacitinib at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants who received tofacitinib is presented in this outcome measure. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a retrospective non-interventional multicenter patient chart review study, collecting real world data from 21 Finnish hospital district databases and for whom data is available.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer | Helsinki | Finland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38156792 | Derived | Molander P, Kosunen M, Eronen H, Tillonen J, Karajamaki A, Heikkinen M, Punkkinen J, Mattila R, Toppila I, Holsa O, Kalpala K, Henrohn D, Af Bjorkesten CG. Tofacitinib real-world experience in ulcerative colitis in Finland (FinTofUC): a retrospective non-interventional multicenter patient chart data study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr;59(4):425-432. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2298361. Epub 2023 Dec 29. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here. | View source |
Not provided
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants with a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) between January 2010 and December 2021 and who initiated tofacitinib across Finland were included in this retrospective chart study. Data was collected from patient registers and charts in Finland. Index date was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. Data was collected and analyzed over 5 months in this retrospective study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants diagnosed with UC between January 2010 and December 2021 and who initiated tofacitinib were included. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants diagnosed with UC between January 2010 and December 2021 and who initiated tofacitinib were included. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age at index (date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis) |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Age at the Time of Diagnosis | Participant's age at the time of ulcerative colitis diagnosis was presented in this outcome measure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years | At diagnosis (anytime between Jan 2010 and Dec-2021, approximately 12 years (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
Not applicable for this study as safety data was not planned to be collected during the study
This study involved data that existed as structured data. In these data sources, individual participant data could not be retrieved/ validated, it was not possible to link (i.e., identify potential association between) particular product and medical event for any individual. Thus, minimum criteria for reporting an adverse event (i.e., identifiable participant, identifiable reporter, a suspect product, and event) was not met. Hence safety data was not collected and reported.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tofacitinib | Participants diagnosed with UC between January 2010 and December 2021 and who initiated tofacitinib were included. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center | Pfizer Inc. | 1-800-718-1021 | ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 1, 2021 | Oct 19, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 23, 2022 | Oct 19, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003093 | Colitis, Ulcerative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003092 | Colitis |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Partial Mayo Score at Initiation of Tofacitinib | Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician (doctors) assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. Partial Mayo scores and sub-scores have been collected by doctors independently as part of standard of care. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Number of Participants According to Endoscopic Findings Based on Histology | Endoscopic findings were graded from 0 to 3 where 0 = Normal or inactive disease (Normal vascular pattern with arborization of capillaries clearly defined, or with blurring or patchy loss of capillary margins), 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Number of Participants According to Endoscopic Sub Score Based on Mayo Score | Endoscopic findings were graded from 0 to 3 where 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Mayo score was composed of four components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity and endoscopy findings. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each subscore ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score which ranged from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. |
| Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical response in participants was defined as a full Mayo score decrease of greater than or equal (>=) to 3 points and a decrease of >=30 percent (%) from baseline, with a decrease of >=1 point on the rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical response in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score decrease of >=2 points and reduction of at least 25% in partial Mayo score from baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding sub score of >=1 point or absolute rectal bleeding sub score of <=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission for All Participants Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission for All Participants Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined for participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants According to Time to Response Based on Full or Partial Mayo Score at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 Months | Time to clinical response was analyzed using a competing risk time-to-event model, where clinical response and drug discontinuation were assessed. Clinical response in participants was defined as full Mayo score decrease of >=3 points & decrease of >=30% from baseline, with decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or absolute rectal bleeding score of <=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, & endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Sub scores were summed up to give total score range: 0 to 12, Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 components without endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3, sub scores were summed up to give total score range: 0 to 9.Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | At 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months |
| Percentage of Participants With Fecal (F)-Calprotectin Reduction of >=50% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=50% from baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With F-calprotectin Reduction of >=75% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=75% compared to baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With F-calprotectin Reduction of >=90% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=90% compared to baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants Reaching F-calprotectin Below 250 mg/kg of Those That Had F-calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants reaching F-calprotectin below 250mg/kg at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 in those participants who had F-calprotectin above 250 mg/kg at Baseline is presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in F-calprotectin at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 With F-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of >=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing = Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response= sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. The Mayo endoscopic sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Higher sub scores indicated higher disease severity. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Physician Assessed Histological Remission at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Physician assessed histological remission was defined as inactive disease or normal histology. Inactive disease was characterized by marked architectural abnormalities in the absence of active inflammation. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Histology Assessment at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Histology assessment was categorized as, 1= inactive disease or normal histology and 2 = active disease. Inactive disease was characterized by marked architectural abnormalities in the absence of active inflammation. Active disease was characterized by absence of active inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for All Participants Based on Full Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for All Participants Based on Partial Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Full Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal classification was system used to classify UC based on the extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were defined by extent of colonic involvement: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to the rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided UC also known as distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to the splenic flexure, E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extents proximal to splenic flexure. Clinical remission: full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, & endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give total score range of 0 to 12. Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was system used to classify UC based on the extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were defined by extent of colonic involvement: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to the rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided UC also known as distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to the splenic flexure, E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extents proximal to splenic flexure. Clinical remission: partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Full Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was used to classify ulcerative colitis (UC) based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Clinical response: full Mayo score decrease of >= 3 points & decrease of >=30% from baseline, with decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12. Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was used to classify ulcerative colitis (UC) based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Clinical response: full Mayo score decrease of >=3 points and decrease of >=30% from baseline, with a decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Tapering at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with corticosteroid tapering response was collected as Yes or No based on latest available data. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Tapering Rate | Corticosteroid tapering rate is reported in this outcome measure. | Up to Week 52 |
| Corticosteroid Tapering Dose | Up to Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Stool Frequency Sub Score of 1 or More Points at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Stool frequency sub score ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = Normal, 1 = 1 to 2 stools per day more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools per day more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools per day than normal. Percentage of participants with improvement in stool frequency sub score of 1 or more points is presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Sub Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Stool frequency sub score ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = Normal, 1 = 1 to 2 stools per day more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools per day more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools per day than normal. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Rectal Bleeding Sub Score of 1 or More Points at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Rectal bleeding sub scores ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = None, 1 = Visible blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Visible blood with stool half of the time or more, 3 = Passing blood alone. Percentage of participants with improvement in rectal bleeding sub score of 1 or more points are presented. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Sub Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Rectal bleeding sub scores ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = None, 1 = Visible blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Visible blood with stool half of the time or more, 3 = Passing blood alone. Baseline was considered as initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants Reaching Normal P-CRP, B-hb, B-leuk, B-Thromb, B-ly, B-Neutr and P-alb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Normal values for the parameters were as follows: P-CRP: below 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L), B-hb: men: 134 to 167 grams per liter (g/L), women: 117-155 g/L, B-leuk: 3.4 to 8.2*10^9 cells/L, B-Thromb: 150 to 360*10^9 cells/L, B-ly: 1.3 to3.6*10^9 cells/L, B-Neutr: 1.5 to6.7*10^9 cells/L, P-alb: 18 to 39 years: 36 to 48 g/L, 40 to 69 years: 36 to 45 g/L, 70 years and over: 34 to 45 g/L. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in P-CRP Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in B-hb and P-alb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in B-leuk, B-ly, B-neutr and B-Thromb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants With Extended Tofacitinib Induction Dose at Week 8, Week 16 | Percentage of participants with extended tofacitinib induction dose (additional 8 weeks with 10 mg) is presented in this outcome measure. | Week 8 and Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants With Higher Dose (10 mg) of Tofacitinib For All Participants at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with higher dose (10 mg) of tofacitinib (for all participants) is presented in this outcome measure. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Higher Dose (10mg) of Tofacitinib of Those on Treatment at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with higher (10 mg) dose of tofacitinib in participants who received treatment at different timepoints is presented in this outcome measure. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Time to Drug Discontinuation, Colectomy or UC-related Hospitalization | Time to survival without drug discontinuation, colectomy or UC-related hospitalization was calculated using time to event analysis. | Up to Week 52 |
| Number of Previous Treatments | Number of previous treatments received by participants is presented in this outcome measure. | Up to Week 52 |
| Number of Participants According to Type of Previous Treatment | Number of participants according to type of their previous treatment received is presented. | Up to Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission of Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Number of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission of Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined for participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants That Had f-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of Participants That had f-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline is presented. | At index (date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis) |
| Change From Baseline in F-calprotectin at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
| Absolute Values of Blood Hemoglobin and Plasma Albumin at Baseline | Absolute Values of Blood Hemoglobin and Plasma Albumin at Baseline are presented in this outcome measure. | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Weight | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilograms |
|
| Height | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Centimeters |
|
| Smoking status | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kilogram per meter square |
|
| Absolute Value of Plasma C-reactive Protein at Baseline | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per liter |
|
| Absolute Values of Blood leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophiles, and thrombocytes | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | 10^9 cells per liter |
|
| Absolute Value of Fecal Calprotectin at Index | 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for specified rows. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per kilogram |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Duration of Ulcerative Colitis | Duration of ulcerative colitis was presented in this outcome measure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Extent of Colonic Involvement According to the Montreal Classification | Montreal classification was used to classify UC based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for UC. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Mayo Score at Initiation of Tofacitinib | Mayo score was composed of four components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician (doctors) assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. Mayo scores and sub-scores have been collected by doctors independently as part of standard of care. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Partial Mayo Score at Initiation of Tofacitinib | Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and physician (doctors) assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. Partial Mayo scores and sub-scores have been collected by doctors independently as part of standard of care. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants According to Endoscopic Findings Based on Histology | Endoscopic findings were graded from 0 to 3 where 0 = Normal or inactive disease (Normal vascular pattern with arborization of capillaries clearly defined, or with blurring or patchy loss of capillary margins), 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 2 = Moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants According to Endoscopic Sub Score Based on Mayo Score | Endoscopic findings were graded from 0 to 3 where 0 = Normal or inactive disease, 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 1 = Mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern, mild friability), 3 = Severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Mayo score was composed of four components: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity and endoscopy findings. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Index was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Received Tofacitinib at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants who received tofacitinib is presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of less than or equal to (<=) 2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each subscore ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score which ranged from 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical response in participants was defined as a full Mayo score decrease of greater than or equal (>=) to 3 points and a decrease of >=30 percent (%) from baseline, with a decrease of >=1 point on the rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical response in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score decrease of >=2 points and reduction of at least 25% in partial Mayo score from baseline with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding sub score of >=1 point or absolute rectal bleeding sub score of <=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission for All Participants Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission for All Participants Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined for participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants According to Time to Response Based on Full or Partial Mayo Score at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 Months | Time to clinical response was analyzed using a competing risk time-to-event model, where clinical response and drug discontinuation were assessed. Clinical response in participants was defined as full Mayo score decrease of >=3 points & decrease of >=30% from baseline, with decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or absolute rectal bleeding score of <=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, & endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Sub scores were summed up to give total score range: 0 to 12, Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 components without endoscopy findings. Each graded from 0 to 3, sub scores were summed up to give total score range: 0 to 9.Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies maximum participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | At 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Fecal (F)-Calprotectin Reduction of >=50% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=50% from baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With F-calprotectin Reduction of >=75% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=75% compared to baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With F-calprotectin Reduction of >=90% at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants with F-calprotectin reduction of >=90% compared to baseline at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Reaching F-calprotectin Below 250 mg/kg of Those That Had F-calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of participants reaching F-calprotectin below 250mg/kg at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 in those participants who had F-calprotectin above 250 mg/kg at Baseline is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in F-calprotectin at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 With F-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per kilogram | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of >=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Mayo score was an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing = Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response= sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. The Mayo endoscopic sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Higher sub scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Physician Assessed Histological Remission at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Physician assessed histological remission was defined as inactive disease or normal histology. Inactive disease was characterized by marked architectural abnormalities in the absence of active inflammation. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Histology Assessment at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Histology assessment was categorized as, 1= inactive disease or normal histology and 2 = active disease. Inactive disease was characterized by marked architectural abnormalities in the absence of active inflammation. Active disease was characterized by absence of active inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for All Participants Based on Full Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies maximum number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for All Participants Based on Partial Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies maximum number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Full Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal classification was system used to classify UC based on the extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were defined by extent of colonic involvement: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to the rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided UC also known as distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to the splenic flexure, E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extents proximal to splenic flexure. Clinical remission: full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, & endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give total score range of 0 to 12. Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was system used to classify UC based on the extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were defined by extent of colonic involvement: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to the rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided UC also known as distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to the splenic flexure, E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extents proximal to splenic flexure. Clinical remission: partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Full Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was used to classify ulcerative colitis (UC) based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Clinical response: full Mayo score decrease of >= 3 points & decrease of >=30% from baseline, with decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12. Higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score According to Montreal Classification at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 | Montreal Classification was used to classify ulcerative colitis (UC) based on extent of inflammation. Three subgroups of UC were: E1= ulcerative proctitis: involvement limited to rectum i.e, proximal extent of inflammation is distal to rectosigmoid junction, E2= left sided, distal colitis: involvement limited to portion of colorectum distal to splenic flexure and E3= extensive UC (pancolitis): involvement extends proximal to the splenic flexure. Clinical response: full Mayo score decrease of >=3 points and decrease of >=30% from baseline, with a decrease of >=1 point on rectal bleeding sub score or an absolute rectal bleeding score of less than equal to (<=)1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24, and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Tapering at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with corticosteroid tapering response was collected as Yes or No based on latest available data. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Tapering Rate | Corticosteroid tapering rate is reported in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligram per day | Up to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Corticosteroid Tapering Dose | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams | Up to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Stool Frequency Sub Score of 1 or More Points at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Stool frequency sub score ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = Normal, 1 = 1 to 2 stools per day more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools per day more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools per day than normal. Percentage of participants with improvement in stool frequency sub score of 1 or more points is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Sub Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Stool frequency sub score ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = Normal, 1 = 1 to 2 stools per day more than normal, 2 = 3 to 4 stools per day more than normal, 3 = 5 or more stools per day than normal. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Rectal Bleeding Sub Score of 1 or More Points at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Rectal bleeding sub scores ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = None, 1 = Visible blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Visible blood with stool half of the time or more, 3 = Passing blood alone. Percentage of participants with improvement in rectal bleeding sub score of 1 or more points are presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Sub Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Rectal bleeding sub scores ranged from 0 to 3, where, 0 = None, 1 = Visible blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = Visible blood with stool half of the time or more, 3 = Passing blood alone. Baseline was considered as initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reaching Normal P-CRP, B-hb, B-leuk, B-Thromb, B-ly, B-Neutr and P-alb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Normal values for the parameters were as follows: P-CRP: below 4 milligrams per liter (mg/L), B-hb: men: 134 to 167 grams per liter (g/L), women: 117-155 g/L, B-leuk: 3.4 to 8.2*10^9 cells/L, B-Thromb: 150 to 360*10^9 cells/L, B-ly: 1.3 to3.6*10^9 cells/L, B-Neutr: 1.5 to6.7*10^9 cells/L, P-alb: 18 to 39 years: 36 to 48 g/L, 40 to 69 years: 36 to 45 g/L, 70 years and over: 34 to 45 g/L. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in P-CRP Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per liter | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in B-hb and P-alb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Grams per liter | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in B-leuk, B-ly, B-neutr and B-Thromb Levels at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | 10^9 cells per liter | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Extended Tofacitinib Induction Dose at Week 8, Week 16 | Percentage of participants with extended tofacitinib induction dose (additional 8 weeks with 10 mg) is presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 8 and Week 16 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Higher Dose (10 mg) of Tofacitinib For All Participants at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with higher dose (10 mg) of tofacitinib (for all participants) is presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Higher Dose (10mg) of Tofacitinib of Those on Treatment at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Percentage of participants with higher (10 mg) dose of tofacitinib in participants who received treatment at different timepoints is presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Drug Discontinuation, Colectomy or UC-related Hospitalization | Time to survival without drug discontinuation, colectomy or UC-related hospitalization was calculated using time to event analysis. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Months | Up to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Previous Treatments | Number of previous treatments received by participants is presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Treatments | Up to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants According to Type of Previous Treatment | Number of participants according to type of their previous treatment received is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission of Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Steroid-free Clinical Remission of Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial Mayo score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined for participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants That Had f-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Percentage of Participants That had f-Calprotectin Above 250 mg/kg at Baseline is presented. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | At index (date of initiation of tofacitinib treatment for ulcerative colitis) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in F-calprotectin at Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | F-calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. Baseline was considered as date of initiation of tofacitinib. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per kilogram | Baseline, Week 8, Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a full Mayo score of <=2 points, with no individual sub score exceeding 1 point with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies maximum number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 | Clinical remission in participants was defined as a partial score of less than 2 points with rectal bleeding sub-score of 0. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each sub score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | From Week 16 to Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Partial Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Partial Mayo score consisted of 3 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity. Each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 9, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'No participants fulfilled the criteria for the analysis'. | Posted | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants in Sustained Steroid Free Remission for Those Treated With Corticosteroids at Baseline Based on Full Mayo Score and Endoscopic Remission, Mucosal Healing or Endoscopic Response From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 | Sustained endoscopic remission was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0. Mucosal healing was defined by Mayo endoscopic sub score of 0 or 1. Endoscopic response was defined as sub score reduction from baseline of >=1. Full Mayo score consisted of 4 sub scores: rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment of disease activity, and endoscopy findings, each graded from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). These sub scores were summed up to give a total score range of 0 to 12, where higher scores indicated higher disease severity. Steroid-free clinical remission was defined as clinical remission in participants who were treated with corticosteroids at baseline and did not require any corticosteroid treatment during the period >=4 weeks prior to the visit. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. Here, 'No participants fulfilled the criteria for the analysis'. | Posted | From Week 8 to Week 16, Week 24 and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Absolute Values of Blood Hemoglobin and Plasma Albumin at Baseline | Absolute Values of Blood Hemoglobin and Plasma Albumin at Baseline are presented in this outcome measure. | All eligible participants for whom data was collected and analyzed were included. 'Overall Number of Participants Analyzed' contributed data to table but may not have evaluable data for every row. Here, 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoints. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Grams per liter | At index (from data collected and analyzed retrospectively over 5 months) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
| D015212 |
| Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| Normal histology |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| 3 months |
|
|
| 6 months |
|
|
| 12 months |
|
|
| 24 months |
|
|
| 36 months |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Week 52 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 8 to Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 8 to Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
| Week 8 to Week 52 |
|
| Week 8 to Week 52 |
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 24 |
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 52 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 52 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 24 |
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 52 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 52 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 24 |
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 52 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 52 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 24 |
|
|
| E1 ulcerative proctitis, Week 52 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E2 left-sided UC, Week 52 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 8 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 16 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 24 |
|
|
| E3 extensive UC, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| P-CRP, Week 24 |
|
|
| P-CRP, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-hb, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-hb, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-hb, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-hb, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-Neutr, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-Neutr, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-Neutr, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-Neutr, Week 52 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 8 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 16 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 24 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| B-hb, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-hb, Week 52 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 8 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 16 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 24 |
|
|
| P-alb, Week 52 |
|
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-leuk, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-ly, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-neutr, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-neutr, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-neutr, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-neutr, Week 52 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 8 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 16 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 24 |
|
|
| B-Thromb, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Azathioprine |
|
| 6-Mercaptopurine |
|
| Methotrexate |
|
| Ciclosporin |
|
| Ustekinumab |
|
| Vedolizumab |
|
| Adalimumab |
|
| Infliximab |
|
| Golimumab |
|
| Bio naïve |
|
| Bioexperienced |
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
| Week 24 |
|
|
| Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Plasma albumin |
|
|