Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Retrospective study, single blind (patient), allowing a posteriori clinical data collection of 90 patients during their passage to the ambulatory endoscopy circuit, to consider 3 groups and thus to deduce a colonic adenoma detection rate for each arm :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopy Only Group | |||
| Artificial intelligence GI GENIUS ™ only Group | |||
| Endoscopic Cap and Artificial Intelligence GI GENIUS ™ Group |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Colonic Adenomas Detection Rate according to the use of the Combine Techniques GENIUS software - Cap or Only GENIUS software | number of colonoscopies with the discovery of at least 1 colonic adenoma out of the total number of colonoscopies according to the use of colonoscopy alone / artificial intelligence alone / artificial intelligence combined with the endoscopic cap. | 4 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adenomas Rate according to their morphology | according to Paris classification | 4 months |
| Adenomas Rate according to their size | < 0,5mm / 0-5-10mm / > 10mm |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria :
Exclusion Criteria :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients are recruited during a pre-colonoscopy consultation, carried out by the gastroenterologist in current practice
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Nîmes | Nîmes | Gard | 34000 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39493261 | Derived | Caillo L, Delliot C, Chevallier T, Bourgaux JF, Prost A, Brunaud-Gagniard B, Phoutthasang V, Clerc C, Borderie T, Daniel J, Pouderoux P, Debourdeau A. COLODETECT 1: comparative evaluation of endocuff with computer-aided detection versus computer-aided detection alone versus standard colonoscopy for enhancing adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopy-a pilot study. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 27;17:17562848241290433. doi: 10.1177/17562848241290433. eCollection 2024. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D003110 | Colonic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 4 months |
| Adenomas Rate according to their histology | according to Vienne classification | 4 months |
| Caecal Intubation Rate | Complete colonocopy rate | 4 months |
| Withdrawal time | 4 months |
| Adverse effects | Haemorrhages, Perforation | 4 months |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |