Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-000224-35 | EudraCT Number | ||
| 1-10-72-163-21 | Other Identifier | The Committee on Health Research Ethics, Central Denmark Region |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Aarhus | OTHER |
| Aarhus University Hospital | OTHER |
| Viborg Regional Hospital | OTHER |
| Randers Regional Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-labeled, feasibility trial investigating volumes of fluid within 24 hours in 124 patients with sepsis allocated to two different IV fluid regimens enrolled at three emergency departments in Central Region Denmark. The primary outcome is total intravenous, crystalloid fluid volume within 24 hours and key secondary outcomes include protocol violations, total fluids (intravenous and oral) within 24 hours, SAEs/SUSARs, and inhospital-, 30- and 90-day mortality.
BACKGROUND:
Sepsis is common in emergency department (ED) patients. Traditionally, intravenous (IV) fluids are used to optimise the circulation, and the use of higher volumes is recommended by international guidelines, but there are no recommendations for sepsis without hypotension or shock. Studies in septic shock seem to favour fluid restriction. Whether this is true in sepsis without hypotension/shock is unknown.
OBJECTIVES:
The aim of the REFACED Sepsis trial is to test if an IV fluid restrictive protocol in ED patients with sepsis is feasible, i.e., if the protocol decreases the IV fluid volumes administered.
DESIGN:
REFACED Sepsis is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-labeled, feasibility trial
POPULATION:
ED patients with sepsis expected to be admitted for ≥ 24 hours
EXPERIMENTAL INTERVENTION:
In the IV fluid restriction group no IV fluids should be given unless one of the below mentioned occurs;
A fluid bolus of 250 ml isotonic crystalloid may be given within 15 minutes if one of the following occurs (hypoperfusion criteria):
All patients will be ensured min. 1 L of oral/intravenous fluids in 24 hours and electrolytes can be corrected.
CONTROL INTERVENTION:
In the usual care group there will be no upper limit for the use of IV fluids.
OUTCOMES:
The primary outcome is 24-hour intravenous crystalloid fluid administration. Key secondary outcomes are: Feasibility measures: Number of patients with major protocol violations, Number of patients screened vs included, Time from admission to inclusion, Number of patients lost to follow up in terms of 24-hour fluids, Accumulated serious adverse reactions and events (SAEs + Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs)) within 48 hours in-hospital, Total fluids (oral and intravenous) at 24 hours,
TRIAL-SIZE:
124 patients will be randomized to restrictive fluid administration or usual care within 24 hours of randomization
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restrictive fluid administration | Experimental | No IV fluids unless one of the extenuating circumstances occur;
|
|
| Usual care (standard care) | Active Comparator | There will be no upper limit for the use of either IV or oral/enteral fluids
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isotonic crystalloids | Drug | Types of fluids in both intervention groups:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 24-hour crystalloid iv. fluids | total amount of all administered intravenous, crystalloid fluids within 24 hours of randomization | 24 hours from randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol violations | Feasibility measure: Number of patients with major protocol violations | 24 hours from randomization |
| Screened-vs.-randomized-ratio | Feasibility measure: Number of patients screened vs included |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: All of the below must be fulfilled:
Unplanned emergency department admission
Age ≥ 18 years
Sepsis defined as
Expected hospital stay > 24 hours as deemed by treating clinician
Further more the patient must fulfill criteria for enrollment in an acute study according to Danish law
Exclusion Criteria: We will exclude patients fulfilling any of following exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marie K Jessen, MD | Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital | Aarhus | Central Jutland | 8200 | Denmark | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35652491 | Derived | Jessen MK, Andersen LW, Thomsen MH, Kristensen P, Hayeri W, Hassel RE, Messerschmidt TG, Solling CG, Perner A, Petersen JAK, Kirkegaard H. Restrictive fluids versus standard care in adults with sepsis in the emergency department (REFACED): A multicenter, randomized feasibility trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;29(10):1172-1184. doi: 10.1111/acem.14546. Epub 2022 Aug 5. | |
| 35351214 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018805 | Sepsis |
| D007022 | Hypotension |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D018746 | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome |
| D007249 | Inflammation |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Time to inclusion | Feasibility measure: Time from admission to inclusion/randomization (hours) | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Lost-to-follow-up-rate | Feasibility measure: Number of patients lost to follow up in terms of 24-hour fluids | 24 hours from randomization |
| Accumulated serious adverse reactions (SARs + SUSARs) | Feasibility measure: Accumulated serious adverse reactions and events (SAEs + SARs+ SUSARs) within 7 days in-hospital | 7 days from randomization |
| Total 24-hour fluids | Total fluids (oral and intravenous) at 24 hours | 24 hours from randomization |
| Mortality | In-hospital, 30- and 90-days mortality | Total of 90-days |
| Department of Emergency Medicine, Regional Hospital Randers |
| Randers |
| Central Jutland |
| 8930 |
| Denmark |
| Department of Emergency Medicine, Regional Hospital Viborg | Viborg | Central Jutland | 8800 | Denmark |
| Jessen MK, Andersen LW, Thomsen MH, Kristensen P, Hayeri W, Hassel RE, Perner A, Petersen JAK, Kirkegaard H. Restrictive Fluid Administration vs. Standard of Care in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients (REFACED Sepsis)-protocol for a multicenter, randomized, clinical, proof-of-concept trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Mar 29;8(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01034-y. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |