Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-004766-35 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nemolizumab compared to placebo at reducing the intensity of pruritus after a 12-week treatment period in adult hemodialysis participants with moderate to severe pruritus.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nemolizumab 30 mg | Experimental |
| |
| Nemolizumab 60 mg | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nemolizumab | Drug | Participants received a loading dose of 60 mg nemolizumab at Baseline followed by 2 Subcutaneous (SC) injections for a total dose of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI NRS) Greater Than and Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 4 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or Adverse event(AE)/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by responders to report intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during last 24 hours. Participants were asked following question: For worst itch intensity:"On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 3 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 3 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 3 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants aged >= 18 years at the screening visit.
Had end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and had been on hemodialysis three times per week for at least three months prior to the start of screening.
Note 1: Participants who required an occasional additional hemodialysis treatment to manage fluid overload might be enrolled as long as it was anticipated that no more than one such treatment would be required in any given week.
Note 2: Participants had received in-home hemodialysis might participated as long as they had switched to in-center hemodialysis at least two weeks prior to screening and plan to remain on in-center hemodialysis for the duration of the study.
Hemodialysis participants meeting the Kidney Outcome Quality Initiative Guidelines of hemodialysis adequacy within 60 days of screening, two:
•Single-poolsKt/V measurements of at least 1.2.
Pruritus for >= three months (documented pruritus with no etiology identified other than CKD by medical record, previous physician's letter/statement, or a written conversation of site investigators based on the medical history obtained from the participant).
WI NRS score >= 5.0 at the screening and baseline visit. Screening WI NRS score would be determined by a single WI NRS assessment (score ranging from 0 to 10) for the 24-hour period immediately preceding the screening visit. Baseline WI NRS score would be determined based on the weekly average of daily WI NRS scores (score ranging from 0 to 10) during the seven days immediately preceding baseline (rounding was not permitted). A minimum of four daily scores out of the seven days immediately preceding baseline was required for this calculation.
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) (i.e., fertile, following menarche and until becoming post-menopausal unless permanently sterile) must agreed either to commit to true abstinence throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study drug injection, when this was in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant, or to use an adequate and approved method of contraception throughout the study and for 12 weeks after the last study injection.
Adequate and approved methods of contraception applicable for the participant and/or her partner were defined below:
Women were considered to be of non-childbearing potential if they meet one of the following criteria:
Note: Bilateral tubal ligation was not accepted as reason for non-childbearing potential.
Participant was willing and able to comply with all time commitments and procedural requirements of the clinical study protocol.
Understands and signs an informed consent form (ICF) before any investigational procedure(s) were performed.
Exclusion Criteria:
Body weight less than (<) 30 kg.
Pruritus caused by a concomitant condition unrelated to ESKD (e.g., dermatologic or systemic disorders such as, but not limited to atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis, prurigo nodularis (PN), Chronic T- cell Lymphoma, Leukemia or cholestatic liver disease).
Localized itch of only the palms of the hands and/or soles of the feet.
Pruritus present only during hemodialysis session.
History of or anticipated non-compliance with hemodialysis (i.e, such that it would adversely affect the conduct of the study or significantly change dialysis adequacy during the study) in the opinion of the investigator.
New York Heart Association Class IV symptoms or myocardial infarction within three months prior to screening.
History of stroke or transient ischemic attack within six months prior to screening.
Participants meeting one or more of the following criteria at screening or baseline:
Cutaneous infection within one week before the baseline visit, any infection requiring treatment with oral or parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics or antifungals within two weeks before the baseline visit.
Any confirmed or suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection within two weeks before the screening or baseline visit. Participants might be rescreened after the infection had resolved. Resolution of COVID-19 infection could be confirmed by recovery assessment methods, as described in the protocol.
Positive serology results (hepatitis B surface antigen [HbsAg] or hepatitis B core antibody [HbcAb], hepatitis C [HCV] antibody with positive confirmatory test for hepatitis C virus [HCV] (e.g., HCV polymerase chain reaction [PRC]), or human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] antibody) at the screening visit.
Note: Participants with a positive HbcAb and a negative HbsAg could be included in this clinical study if hepatitis B surface antibody was positive (considered immune after a natural infection or vaccination). Participants who were positive for HCV antibody and negative for HCV RNA might be enrolled.
In the event of rescreening, the serology tests results (e.g., HBV, HCV, HIV) from the previous screening could be used by the investigator to assess the eligibility of rescreened participants if those tests were performed within six weeks prior to the baseline visit.
Known active or untreated latent tuberculosis (TB) infection or history of either untreated or inadequately treated active or latent TB according to the local applicable guidelines.
Note: Participants who had a documented history of completion of an appropriate TB treatment regimen for latent or active TB with no history of re-exposure to TB since their treatment was completed were eligible to participate in the study.
Known or suspected immunosuppression beyond that expected due to end-stage kidney disease and its comorbidities or unusually frequent, recurrent, severe, or prolonged infections as per investigator judgment.
History of lymphoproliferative disease or history of malignancy of any organ system within the last five years, except for (1) basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease), or carcinomas in situ of the cervix that had been treated and had no evidence of recurrence in the last 12 weeks before the baseline visit, or (2) actinic keratoses that had been treated.
Pregnant women (positive serum pregnancy test result at any visits), breastfeeding women, or women planning a pregnancy during the clinical study.
In the opinion of the investigator the participant had any medical or psychological condition that could pose undue risk to the participant, prevent study completion, or adversely affect the validity or interpretability of the study measurements or interfered with study assessments.
Any clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities, such as but not limited to elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (>3 * upper limit of normal [ULN]) in combination with elevated bilirubin (>2 * ULN), during the screening period that might put the participant at significant risk according to the investigator's judgment, if he/she participated in the clinical study.
Planned or expected major surgical procedure during the clinical study, including a scheduled kidney transplant during the study.
Had not adhered to the restrictions in the selected medications prior to screening or was not expected to be compliant with restrictions during the study.
Requiring rescue therapy for pruritus during the screening period or expected to require rescue therapy within 4 weeks following the Baseline visit.
Previous treatment with nemolizumab.
History of hypersensitivity (including anaphylaxis) to an immunoglobulin product (plasma-derived or recombinant, e.g. monoclonal antibody) or to any of the study drug excipients.
Currently participating or participated in any other study of an investigational drug or device, within the past four weeks (or five half-lives of the investigational medication, whichever was longer) before the screening visit.
History of alcohol or substance abuse within six months of the screening visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galderma Investigational Site 9989 | Bakersfield | California | 93309 | United States | ||
| Galderma Investigational Site 9991 |
A total of 258 participants were enrolled and treated in this study.
This study was conducted at 53 study sites in 4 countries from 18 March 2022 to 04 January 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Nemolizumab 30 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 60 milligrams (mg) nemolizumab at Baseline followed by 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections for a total dose of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| FG001 | Nemolizumab 60 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 25, 2023 | Jan 28, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This was a double-blind study. The randomization code remained blinded to all participants, study sites personnel and Sponsor/CRO study team members until completion of the study and after the study database had been locked.
|
| Nemolizumab | Drug | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
| Baseline, Week 12 |
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 4 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 4 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (SD NRS) >= 4 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are participants with an improvement >= 4 in SD NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. SD NRS is a scale used by participants to report degree of their sleep loss related to chronic kidney disease with associated pruritus (CKD-aP ). Participants were asked following question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of pruritus' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of pruritus', how would you rate your sleep last night?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of SD NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 3 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 3 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 3 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of SD NRS >= 4 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement >= 4 in SD NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The SD NRS is a scale used by participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to CKD-aP. Participants were asked the following question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of pruritus' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of pruritus', how would you rate your sleep last night?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of SD NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | Baseline, Week 4 |
| Glendale |
| California |
| 91205 |
| United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7018 | Glendale | California | 91206 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7015 | La Palma | California | 90623 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9996 | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9978 | Lynwood | California | 90262 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7017 | Riverside | California | 92505 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9973 | Tarzana | California | 91356 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7028 | Victorville | California | 92392 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9964 | Victorville | California | 92394-1868 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7003 | Whittier | California | 90603 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9971 | Denver | Colorado | 80230 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9988 | Bloomfield | Connecticut | 06002 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9980 | Middlebury | Connecticut | 06762 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9970 | Boca Raton | Florida | 33421 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7037 | Coral Gables | Florida | 33134 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7026 | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9965 | Miami | Florida | 33125 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site7016 | Miami | Florida | 33155 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7032 | Sanford | Florida | 32771 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7004 | Tampa | Florida | 33603 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7025 | Tampa | Florida | 33603 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7027 | Columbus | Georgia | 31904 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9983 | Overland Park | Kansas | 66210 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9972 | Wichita | Kansas | 67214 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9963 | Roseville | Michigan | 48066 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7020 | Edina | Minnesota | 55435 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9982 | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55404 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7035 | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9962 | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89128 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7038 | Fresh Meadows | New York | 11365 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9998 | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9995 | The Bronx | New York | 10461 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7007 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9992 | Roseburg | Oregon | 97471 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9999 | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29306 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9967 | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37404 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7039 | Arlington | Texas | 76015 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7040 | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9966 | El Paso | Texas | 79925 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9977 | Greenville | Texas | 75402 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7011 | Houston | Texas | 77054 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7022 | McKinney | Texas | 75069 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7010 | San Antonio | Texas | 78258 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 7019 | The Woodlands | Texas | 77384 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9968 | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 9969 | Wauwatosa | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6301 | Budapest | 1076 | Hungary |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6304 | Kecskemét | 6000 | Hungary |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6305 | Miskolc | 3526 | Hungary |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6310 | Szentes | 6600 | Hungary |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6298 | Szombathely | 9700 | Hungary |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6294 | Brodnica | 87-300 | Poland |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6296 | Lodz | 90-153 | Poland |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6293 | Olkusz | 32-300 | Poland |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6297 | Wroclaw | 50-556 | Poland |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6309 | Alcobendas | 28108 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6292 | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 5580 | L'Hospitalet de Llobregat | 08097 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 5171 | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6190 | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6278 | Manises | 46940 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6295 | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
| Galderma Investigational Site 6311 | Valencia | 46017 | Spain |
Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| FG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Nemolizumab 30 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 60 mg nemolizumab at Baseline followed by 2 SC injections for a total dose of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| BG001 | Nemolizumab 60 mg | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| BG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI NRS) Greater Than and Equal to (>=) 4 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 4 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or Adverse event(AE)/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by responders to report intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during last 24 hours. Participants were asked following question: For worst itch intensity:"On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 3 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 3 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 3 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 4 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 4 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (SD NRS) >= 4 From Baseline at Week 12 | Responders are participants with an improvement >= 4 in SD NRS from baseline at Week 12 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. SD NRS is a scale used by participants to report degree of their sleep loss related to chronic kidney disease with associated pruritus (CKD-aP ). Participants were asked following question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of pruritus' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of pruritus', how would you rate your sleep last night?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of SD NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 12 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from study prior to Week 12 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of WI NRS >= 3 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement of >= 3 in WI NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The WI NRS is a scale that is used by the responders to report the intensity of their worst pruritus (itch) during the last 24 hours. Participants were asked the following question: For worst itch intensity: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no itch' and 10 being the 'worst itch imaginable', how would you rate your itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of WI NRS >= 3 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders With an Improvement of SD NRS >= 4 From Baseline at Week 4 | Responders are defined as participants with an improvement >= 4 in SD NRS from baseline at Week 4 without use of rescue therapies and without treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or AE/death related to study drug. The SD NRS is a scale used by participants to report the degree of their sleep loss related to CKD-aP. Participants were asked the following question: "On a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being 'no sleep loss related to the symptoms of pruritus' and 10 being 'I did not sleep at all due to the symptoms of pruritus', how would you rate your sleep last night?". Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Percentage of responders with an improvement of SD NRS >= 4 from Baseline at Week 4 is reported here. Missing data due to discontinuation from the study prior to Week 4 or any other reason (e.g., insufficient eDiary completion) were imputed using multiple imputation under missing at random assumption (results were combined using Rubin's formulae). | ITT population consisted of all randomized participants. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 4 |
|
From baseline up to Week 20
Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of the study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Nemolizumab 30 mg | Participants received a loading dose of 60 mg nemolizumab at Baseline followed by 2 SC injections for a total dose of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. | 4 | 86 | 33 | 86 | 29 | 86 |
| EG001 | Nemolizumab 60 mg | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. | 4 | 84 | 22 | 84 | 25 | 84 |
| EG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. | 5 | 85 | 27 | 85 | 19 | 85 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous graft site infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacterial myositis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Candida pneumonia | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Catheter site infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis orbital | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest wall abscess | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device related infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetic foot infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endocarditis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gangrene | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis clostridial | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ophthalmic herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteomyelitis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteomyelitis acute | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary sepsis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis bacterial | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal sepsis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular device infection | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure acute | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute left ventricular failure | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrioventricular block | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure chronic | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery aneurysm | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery dissection | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Left ventricular failure | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous graft thrombosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula site haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula maturation failure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous graft site haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic intracranial haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular graft occlusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary alveolar haemorrhage | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypervolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematemesis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metabolic encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal transplant | Surgical and medical procedures | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular access placement | Surgical and medical procedures | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertensive crisis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertensive urgency | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Kidney transplant rejection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver transplant rejection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Benign renal neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Triple negative breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Normochromic normocytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperparathyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypothyroidism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myopathy | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic cirrhosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic enzyme increased | Investigations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enterococcal bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia influenzal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post cardiac arrest syndrome | Nervous system disorders | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypervolaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eosinophilia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polycythaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dialysis hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 25.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sponsor | Galderma Research & Development, LLC | 8179615000 | aestheticclinicaltrials@galderma.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 19, 2024 | Jan 28, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051436 | Renal Insufficiency, Chronic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D051437 | Renal Insufficiency |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000612881 | nemolizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Nemolizumab 60 mg versus Placebo | Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.0686 | Threshold of significance at 0.025. | Strata adjusted percentage difference | 14.5 | 2-Sided | 97.5 | -3.1 | 32.2 | Superiority | Analysis was performed using hierarchical testing procedure. Testing was then performed sequentially in order the outcome measures were reported and continued when previous outcome measure was statistically significant at two-sided 0.025. |
Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8.
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
|
Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8.
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
|
Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8.
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
|
Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8.
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 2 SC injections of 30 mg placebo-matched to nemolizumab once every 4 weeks i.e. at Week 4 and Week 8. |
|
|
|