Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| German Federal Ministry of Education and Research | OTHER_GOV |
| Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Within the MobiStaR project the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients significantly, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation outcomes for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization.
The intervention study will assess the organizational feasibility of robot-assisted early mobilization (starting in the first 72 hours after admission to the ICU), the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals and the effects on patient outcomes in terms of ventilation time, muscle mass (sonographic examination) and physical activity (measured by established scores such as Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU) and Medical Research Council (MRC) classification).
Early mobilization means the mobilization of critically ill patients in the early course after admission to the intensive care unit. The positive influence of early mobilization of critically ill patients on various aspects of patient outcomes has already been demonstrated. However, the implementation of early mobilization in clinical practice is difficult. Especially the high personnel effort is a barrier.
The Munich-based company Reactive Robotics (RR) is currently developing the world's first adaptive robotic assistance system VEMO©, which has CE approval for the planned indication and is to be used in the medium term for mobilizing intensive care patients.
Within the MobiStaR project, the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to significantly increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation results for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization. In this project, the robotic system will be used in anesthesiology intensive care units of the Ludwigs-Maximilians-University hospital.
Within this study, the effects of robot-assisted early mobilization will now be evaluated. This study comprises three study arms, in which (1) the feasibility and practicability of robot-assisted early mobilization, (2) the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals, and (3) the effect on patient outcomes will be evaluated.
The study is monocentric, prospective, interventional, does not include invasive procedures or blood sampling and has multiple data collection time points.
The intervention is planned for a duration of five to six months starting in September 2021.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patients with robot-assisted early mobilization | Active Comparator | All patients will receive a physical examination at various time points to assess physical functionality and muscle strength, as well as a sonographic examination of leg muscles, diaphragm, and lungs. These examinations should be performed on day -1 (preoperatively), on postoperative days 1,2,3, then once a week if the patient remains in the ICU, on day 28, on the day of discharge from the ICU, and on a follow-up examination approximately 3 months after discharge from the ICU.The follow-up examination should only take place if the patients present themselves at the hospital anyway due to medically indicated follow-up examinations (not study-related). Alternatively, patients can be asked about their condition by telephone. |
|
| patients with conventional early mobilization (historic group) | No Intervention | All patients fulfill the same criteria like the intervention group and receive conventional early mobilization. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEMO (Reactive Robotics GmbH) | Device | The robot used for early mobilization is able to verticalize the patients in their bed without transfer and to generate a movement of the legs that measures and supports the patients' own movement. The device meets the requirements for mobilizing critically ill patients in an intensive care unit, maintaining hygiene standards and providing the best possible support for the patient's own movement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - Ventilation duration | changes in ventilation duration (in hours) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination Area of the M.rec.femoris | muscle mass (sonographic examination, in millimeters): Area of the M. rec. femoris in comparison to a historical patient group (in cm²) | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness M. quad. femoris | muscle mass: Thickness M. quad. Femoris (in cm²) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination- motility diaphragm breathing | muscle mass: motility of the diaphragm during breathing (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm inspiration | muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during inspiration (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm exhalation | muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during exhalation (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Delir | Delir incidence using the CAM ICU: number of days without Delir. 1 = pathological; 2 = normal; 3 = not performed in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Consciousness | level of consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale (3-15) in comparison to a historical patient group |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Zoller, PD Dr. | Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich | Principal Investigator |
| Inge Eberl, Prof. Dr. | Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt | Principal Investigator |
| Eduard Kraft, PD Dr. | Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich | Principal Investigator |
| Uli Fischer, Dr. | Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LudwigMaximilians | Munich | Bavaria | 81337 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38582934 | Derived | Huebner L, Warmbein A, Scharf C, Schroeder I, Manz K, Rathgeber I, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Mehler-Klamt A, Huber J, Eberl I, Kraft E, Fischer U, Zoller M. Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis. Crit Care. 2024 Apr 6;28(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04896-1. | |
| 38350342 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 27, 2021 | Aug 27, 2021 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010358 | Patient Participation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
The present study is a monocentric, prospective intervention study designed to evaluate the feasibility and
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity - FSS-ICU | physical activity measured using the score FSS-ICU (0 -35) in comparison to a historical patient group. A higher value means a better outcome. | 6 months |
| Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity | physical activity on upper and lower extremity measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) score in comparison to a historical patient group. (0=absent muscle contraction, 1=visible muscle contraction, 2=movement when gravity is eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against resistance, 5=normal strength.) | 6 months |
| Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative interviews | subjectively experienced emotions, motivating and challenging factors - evaluated with a semi-structured interview guideline | 6 months |
| Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative observations | behavior and body posture during the mobilization - evaluated with a standardized observation sheet | 6 months |
| Feasibility in organizational processes - eligible patients | Frequency of eligible patients (count per week: included patients in the study/ new eligible patients in the ICUs) | 6 months |
| Feasibility in organizational processes - mobilizations | frequency of robot-assisted mobilizations (per patient per day) | 6 months |
| Feasibility in organizational processes - adverse events | adverse events (count of patient-related, user-related or technology-related adverse events) | 6 months |
| 6 months |
| Sedation level | Sedation level using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (-5 - +5) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Pain (VAS) | Pain - with the use of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (before and after mobilization) (0-10) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| health related quality of life | Health-related quality of life after 3 months using the the SF-36 (Short form questionnaire) (0-100) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| Blood pressure | hemodynamics - Blood pressure (in mmHg) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| catecholamine demand | hemodynamics - catecholamine demand (cumulative over 24 hours) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| heart rate | hemodynamics - heart rate (1/min) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| cardiac output | hemodynamics - Cardiac output (in l/min) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| oxygen consumption | hemodynamics - Oxygen consumption (in l) in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| respiration | respiration- Maximum respiratory rate for 24h in comparison to a historical patient group | 6 months |
| ICU Score - SOFA | ICU Scores like Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score (SOFA) (0-24) in comparison to a historical patient group. A higher value means a worse outcome. | 6 months |
| ICU Scores - APACHE II | ICU Scores like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) (0-71) in comparison to a historical patient group. A higher value means a worse outcome. | 6 months |
| ICU Scores - SAPS II | ICU Scores like Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (0-163) in comparison to a historical patient group. A higher value means a worse outcome. | 6 months |
| Derived |
| Warmbein A, Hubner L, Rathgeber I, Mehler-Klamt AC, Huber J, Schroeder I, Scharf C, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Manz K, Kraft E, Eberl I, Zoller M, Fischer U. Robot-assisted early mobilization for intensive care unit patients: Feasibility and first-time clinical use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Apr;152:104702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104702. Epub 2024 Jan 26. |
| 36333746 | Derived | Warmbein A, Schroeder I, Mehler-Klamt A, Rathgeber I, Huber J, Scharf C, Hubner L, Gutmann M, Biebl J, Lorenz A, Kraft E, Zoller M, Eberl I, Fischer U. Robot-assisted early mobilization of intensive care patients: a feasibility study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Nov 5;8(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01191-0. |