Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Slow enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study it is aimed to determine the diagnostic value of physiological measurements in the presence of aortic stenosis, and whether these are more accurate than angiographic assessment. Post-TAVR FFR will be taken as the reference for predicting ischemic lesions, and angiography and physiology - FFR and diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) - will be performed immediately before and after TAVR, in an all-comer multicentric observational study.
This is a post-marketing, prospective, observational, single arm, multi-center, single country study in Subjects who have severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with a formal indication for TAVR, and one or more intermediate coronary lesions in a relevant coronary artery (>2mm). This study aims to assess if OpSens non-hyperemic dPR (based on a proprietary algorithm) and/or OpSens FFR are suitable methods for the physiological assessment and prediction of ischemic coronary lesions in Subjects with aortic stenosis who are considered for TAVR. This will be done by comparing pre-TAVR measurements of angiography, dPR and FFR and placing them against the post-TAVR FFR, which is considered as the gold standard. Also the post TAVR dPR will be compared with post-TAVR FFR.
A maximum of 137 subjects will be enrolled in 5 to 10 sites in Spain to obtain the required minimum of 137 lesions (see section 11.2 Sample Size Determination) The main hypothesis is that the specificity to predict ischemic lesions in TAVR candidates based on a pre-TAVR dPR ≤ 0.89 is superior compared to the specificity based on angiography alone (both QCA and visual assessment of the stenosis >50%), taking the post-TAVR FFR value of ≤ 0.80 as a reference for positive lesions.
The pressure guidewire used to measure dPR and FFR during diagnostic angiography is the commercially available (CE-marketed) OptoWire family of pressure guidewires from OpSens Inc.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| dPR and FFR | Subjects with aortic stenosis who are considered for TAVR will undergo a physiological assessment and prediction of ischemic coronary lesions pre- and post-TAVR by using Opsens non-hyperemic dPR and/or Opsens FFR |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| dPR and FFR | Device | OpSens non-hyperemic dPR and/or OpSens FFR |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference between preTAVR dPR specificity and angiography specificity for ischemia | The difference between PreTAVR dPR specificity (%) - angiography specificity (%), taking post-TAVR FFR as the reference measure. | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Diagnostic accuracy | Establish sufficiently precise estimates (+/- 6.5% around estimate) for the diagnostic accuracy of pre-TAVR dPR expressed in terms of sensitivity and specificity, taking as the reference for ischemia the post-TAVR FFR | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in accuracy between dPR and angiography | The difference between the percentage of lesions correctly classified by preTAVR dPR and the percentage of lesions correctly classified by angiography, always taking postTAVR FFR as the reference measure. | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | The success rate of the dPR & FFR procedure, defined as the percentage of cases in which dPR and FFR could be measured, and no procedural complications occurred | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Freedom from adenosine administration |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects who have severe symptomatic aortic stenosis with a formal indication for TAVR, and one or more intermediate coronary lesions in a relevant coronary artery (>2mm) are considered for this study.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Enrique Gutierrez Ibanes, MD | Hospital Gregoio Maranon | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol | Badalona | 08916 | Spain | |||
| Hospital Gregorio Maranon |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Difference in sensitivity between dPR and angiography |
The difference between the sensitivity of preTAVR dPR and the sensitivity of angiography, where:
taking post-TAVR FFR as the reference measure. |
| Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Predicting post-TAVR FFR by pre-TAVR FFR | Overall diagnostic accuracy of preTAVR FFR, defined as the percentage of lesions correctly classified by pre-TAVR FFR, taking postTAVR FFR as the reference measure. | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Difference in accuracy between preTAVR dPR and preTAVR FFR | The difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy of pre-TAVR dPR and pre-TAVR FFR to predict a post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.80 | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Predicting post-TAVR FFR by pre-TAVR hybrid dPR-FFR | Overall diagnostic accuracyof a pre-TAVR hybrid dPR-FFR based approach to predict a post-TAVR FFR ≤ 0.80 | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
The percentage of Subjects who can be spared the administration of adenosine by a hybrid dPR-FFR strategy, while maintaining an overall diagnostic accuracy ≥ 90% |
| Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Percentage of concordance and mean difference between pre- and post-TAVR dPR | Percentage of concordance and mean difference between pre- and post-TAVR dPR | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Percentage of concordance and mean difference between pre- and post-TAVR FFR | Percentage of concordance and mean difference between pre- and post-TAVR FFR | Immediately upon completion of the TAVR procedure |
| Madrid |
| 28007 |
| Spain |
| Hospital Virgen de la Victoria | Málaga | 29110 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico de Santiago | Santiago de Compostela | 15706 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid | Valladolid | 47011 | Spain |
| D014694 |
| Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |