Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The BIPLONG (The Bipolar Disorder in the Longitudinal Course ) study is a longitudinal study on the course of bipolar disorders and comprises two sub-studies: On the one hand, BIPLONG examines the genetic foundation and change in bipolar disorder, on the other hand, metabolic changes, clinical symptoms and cognition in bipolar disorders is evaluated. A current subproject of BIPLONG is the analysis of the psychological response of the COVID-19 (Corona virus disease) pandemic. With the parameters examined in BIPLONG, it is hoped to gain better understanding of the bipolar disorder in the longitudinal course.
Study Procedure:
In addition to the bipolar patients, healthy controls will also be included. The same inventories will be used for the control subjects and the same examinations or visits will be performed; bipolar-specific disease questions will not be asked in controls.
Intervention: Longitudinal study
Method:
All patients and controls undergo several assessments every six months:
Blood samples are collected with the following main parameters of interest being examined:
Additionally, socio-demographic data and psychological data are collected by administering self-assessment questionnaires. Further, neurocognitive tests are administered.
The current psychological and psychiatric state of all subjects is examined by external ratings done by experts.
Anthropomethric measures are examined (waist-to-hip ratio, blood pressure, weight, height).
Additionally, MRI is conducted on all subjects (for patients every 6 months, for controls every 12 months).
Primary hypothesis:
Statistical analysis and anticipated sample size:
Baseline data analysis will be investigated using a multi-factorial between subject design, with the variables of group (bipolar patients versus healthy controls), gender (males versus females), weight (normal weight versus overweight), etc. as independent factors, depending on the research question. As dependent variables, in addition to sociodemographic and clinical variables (number of episodes, etc.), physiological parameters (blood parameters, anthropometry and lipometer data, EEG, ECG, MRI) and psychological variables (psychological questionnaires) will be investigated. Likewise, covariates such as age or body mass index will be included as needed.
Correlation analyses (bivariate, partial) should show possible correlations between the variables. Discriminant analyses should find out which variable best separates the investigated groups (e.g. patients vs. controls). Furthermore, regression analyses (linear, multiple) will be performed to obtain additional information about the predictive value of the variables under investigation. All analyses will be computed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.
For the "a priori analysis" of the follow-up study (T1-T5), a repeated measures design (repeated measures within factors) was adopted. The case number calculation (effect size d between .30 and .80; Cohen, 1988) for the F-test thus results in a sample size of 47 patients with a target effect size of .40 (power 95%; alpha .05; calculated with GPower 3.1). The correlation analyses at the first measurement time point (power .95, alpha .05, effect size: .35) yields 79 subjects per group (Pat. vs. controls) at all time-points.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Patients with the Diagnosis of a Bipolar Disorder | ||
| Healthy Controls | Individuals with no diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CVLT- california verbal learning test | The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) provides a brief and individualized assessment of verbal learning strategies and processes. The higher the score, the better the outcome | at six months |
| STROOP Farbe-Wort-Interferenz-Test (FWIT) | As an objective and reliable multidimensional performance test, the Color-Word. The Interference Test measures elementary information processing skills (selection, encoding, and decoding) in the visual-verbal functional domain. The lower the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| D2-R | To measure the subject's ability to concentrate and the speed and accuracy in distinguishing similar visual stimuli. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| "Reading the eyes of the mind" =Theory of mind | measurement of the ability to detect social cues. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Trail Making Test A/B, TMT-A | Measurement of cognitive processing speed, as well as linguistic, executive, and attentional components. The lower the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Mehrfachwahl Wortschatz Test (MWT-B) | Measurement of the general intelligence level. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Number Symbol Test |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria healthy controls:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls within the age frame of 18-75 are included.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Reininghaus, MD, PhD, MBA | Contact | +43 316 385 80968 | eva.reininghaus@medunigraz.at | |
| Nina Dalkner, PhD, MSc | Contact | +43 316 385 30081 | nina.dalkner@medunigraz.at |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University Graz | Recruiting | Graz | Styria | 8036 | Austria |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Measurement of processing speed. The higher the score, the better the outcome. |
| at six months |
| Number Repeat | Measurement of working memory. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Beck Depressions Inventar II (BDI-II) | Measurement of depression severity; 21 items on a scale of 0-3 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Manie-Selbstbeurteilungsskala (MSS) (self-rating scale) | Measurement of manic symptoms; 48 items (dichotomous). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Questionnaire of religiosity | socio-demographic assesment of religiosity; 2 items. | at six months |
| Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10) | Measurement of personality variables; 10 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending). | at six months |
| World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL Bref) | Measurement of life-quality and health; 26 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending). | at six months |
| Life Event Questionnaire (LEQ) | Measurement of life events and their influence; 79 items on a scale of 0-3 (ascending) | at six months |
| Temperament and affective disorders (TEMPS-A)-Scale | 35 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Brief symptom inventory (BSI) | Measurement of psychological symptoms; 53 items on a scale of 0-4 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Anhedonia scale (AS) | Measurement of Anhedonia; 14 items on a scale of 1-4 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI-GS-D) | Measurement of burnout symptoms; 16 items on a scale of 1-6 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Resources in Sexuality and Partnership (RSP) | Measurement of relationship emotions; 25 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending).The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Satisfaction in the couple relationship (ZIP) | Measurement of relationship satisfaction; 7 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending), 3 items open questioned. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Demographic Data | Measurement of demographic data | at six months |
| Questionnaire of current life situation | Measurement of demographic and diagnostic data; | at six months |
| Anthropometric Data - weight | Measurement of weight | at six months |
| Anthropometric Data- height | Measurement of height | at six months |
| Anthropometric Data - waist-to-hip ratio | Measurement of waist-to-hip ratio | at six months |
| Anthropometric Data - blood pressure | Measurement of blood pressure | at six months |
| Clinical Global Impression (CGI) | External rating of a symptom severity; 2 items on a scale of 0-7 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Global Assessment Scale of Functioning (GAF) | External rating of level of functioning; 1 item on a scale of 1-100 (ascending). The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) | External rating of depression symptoms; 21 items on a scale of 0-4 (ascending).The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) | External rating of manic symptoms; 11 items on a scale of 0-4/0-8 (ascending). The higher the score, the worse the outcome. | at six months |
| Specific Level of Functioning Assessment and Physical health Inventory (SLOF) | External rating of functioning; 43 items on a scale of 1-5 (ascending), 2 items open questioned. The higher the score, the better the outcome. | at six months |
| Supplementary Data for External Rating | External rating of bipolar symptoms; 7 items. | at six months |