Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-001923-42 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study consisted of 2 parts: Part 1 and 2. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety and tolerability of multiple doses of evobrutinib on single doses of digoxin, metformin and rosuvastatin in Part-1 and sumatriptan in Part-2 of the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Cocktail (Day 1) | Experimental | Participants received single oral dose of Cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 1 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Part 1: Evobrutinib (Days 4 to 12) | Experimental | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Part 1: Evobrutinib + Cocktail (Day 10) | Experimental | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Part 2: Sumatriptan (Day 1) | Experimental | Participants received single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 1 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
|
| Part 2: Evobrutinib (Days 2 to 8) | Experimental |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evobrutinib (45mg) | Drug | Participants received film-coated Evobrutinib tablet at a dose of 45 milligrams (mg), orally twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 and Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Metformin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Rosuvastatin |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAE: AE with onset after start of treatment or with onset date before the treatment start date but worsening after the treatment start date. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Responsible | Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuvisan GmbH | Neu-Ulm | 89231 | Germany |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Trial Awareness and Transparency website | View source |
| Medical Information Location Map - Med Info Contacts | View source |
Not provided
We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and the European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 40 healthy participants were enrolled in two parts single-sequences: Part 1 (Evobrutinib and Cocktail [digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin] as transporter substrates) and Part 2 (Evobrutinib and Sumatriptan as transporter substrate) with each part consists of 20 participants.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Part 1: All Participants | Participants received single oral dose of Cocktail (digoxin 0.25 milligrams [mg] tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Days 1 and 10; Evobrutinib film-coated tablets at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
| FG001 | Part 2: All Participants | Participants received single oral dose of Sumatriptan tablet 25 mg on Days 1 and 8; Evobrutinib film-coated tablets at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice daily on Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Part 1: All Participants | Participants received single oral dose of Cocktail (digoxin 0.25 milligrams [mg] tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Days 1 and 10; Evobrutinib film-coated tablets at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice daily on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Digoxin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Part 1: Cocktail | Participants received single oral dose of Cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 1 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocular hyperaemia | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication Center | Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany | +49-6151-72-5200 | service@emdgroup.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 24, 2021 | Oct 8, 2025 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 7, 2021 | Oct 8, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000632111 | evobrutinib |
| D004077 | Digoxin |
| D008687 | Metformin |
| D000068718 | Rosuvastatin Calcium |
| D018170 | Sumatriptan |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004071 | Digitalis Glycosides |
| D002298 | Cardenolides |
| D002301 | Cardiac Glycosides |
| D002297 | Cardanolides |
Not provided
Not provided
single-sequence study (each part)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
|
| Part 2: Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan (Day 8) | Experimental | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
|
|
| Digoxin (0.25mg) | Drug | Participants received single oral dose of digoxin tablet (0.25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Metformin (10mg) | Drug | Participants received single oral dose of metformin 10 mg solution on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Rosuvastatin (10mg) | Drug | Participants received single oral dose of rosuvastatin tablet (10 mg) on Day 1 and Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions. |
|
| Sumatriptan (25mg) | Drug | Participants received single dose of sumatriptan tablet (25 mg) on Day 1 and Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
|
The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. |
| Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Sumatriptan | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Digoxin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rosuvastatin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sumatriptan | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
| Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Severity of TEAEs were graded using Qualitative Toxicity Scale, as follows: Mild: Participant is aware of the event or symptom, but the event or symptom is easily tolerated; Moderate: Participant experiences sufficient discomfort to interfere with or reduce his or her usual level of activity; Severe: Significant impairment of functioning: the participant is unable to carry out his or her usual activities. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
| Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters | Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Clinical meaningful changes were determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
| Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs | Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
| Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings were reported. | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
| Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Digoxin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Metformin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Rosuvastatin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sumatriptan | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Digoxin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Metformin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Rosuvastatin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Sumatriptan | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Digoxin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Metformin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Rosuvastatin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Sumatriptan | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Digoxin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification; Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Metformin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Rosuvastatin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Sumatriptan | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Digoxin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Metformin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Rosuvastatin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Sumatriptan | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
| Part 1: Cumulative Amount Excreted (CAE) From Time Zero to the End of the Collection Interval After Dosing Dosing (Ae0-36) of Metformin | Ae0-36 was calculated as the cumulative amount excreted from time zero (= dosing time) to the end of the collection interval after dosing, for metformin only. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 1: Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin | CLr was calculated as Ae0-36 divided by AUC0-36, for metformin only. AUC0-36: AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to 36 hours post-dose (metformin only) calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
| Part 2: All Participants |
Participants received single oral dose of Sumatriptan tablet 25 mg on Days 1 and 8; Evobrutinib film-coated tablets at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice daily on Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Metformin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Rosuvastatin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Sumatriptan | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination: AUC0-inf= AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/lambda z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was defined as the predicted concentration at the last sampling time, calculated from the log-linear regression line for lambda z determination and Lambda z was the apparent terminal rate constant. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Digoxin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Rosuvastatin | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Part 2: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sumatriptan | Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether considered related to the study intervention or not. Serious AE: an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. TEAE: AE with onset after start of treatment or with onset date before the treatment start date but worsening after the treatment start date. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs. | The safety analysis set (SAF) included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity | Severity of TEAEs were graded using Qualitative Toxicity Scale, as follows: Mild: Participant is aware of the event or symptom, but the event or symptom is easily tolerated; Moderate: Participant experiences sufficient discomfort to interfere with or reduce his or her usual level of activity; Severe: Significant impairment of functioning: the participant is unable to carry out his or her usual activities. Number of participants with TEAEs by severity were reported. | The SAF included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameters | Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Clinical meaningful changes were determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in laboratory parameters were reported. | The SAF included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs | Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in vital signs were reported. | The SAF included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1 and Part 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes From Baseline in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | 12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration and QT interval. The corrected QT interval (QTcF) was calculated using Fridericia's formula. 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after the participants have rested for at least 10 minutes in semisupine position. Clinical relevance was determined by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically relevant changes from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings were reported. | The SAF included all participants, who were administered any dose of any study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Part 1: Cocktail Alone - Day 1 to Day 3; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 4 to Day 9; Evobrutinib + Cocktail - Day 10 to Day 12; Part 2: Sumatriptan Alone - Day 1; Evobrutinib Alone - Day 2 to Day 7; Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan - Day 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Digoxin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Metformin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Rosuvastatin | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 2: Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Sumatriptan | Tmax was the time to reach the maximum observed concentration collected during a dosing interval. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Digoxin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Metformin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Rosuvastatin | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 2: Apparent Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of Sumatriptan | T1/2 was defined as the time required for the concentration or amount of drug in the body to be reduced by one-half. T1/2 was calculated by natural log 2 divided by Lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression method. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Hours | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Digoxin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Metformin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Rosuvastatin | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-tlast) of Sumatriptan | The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification was calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | h*ng/mL | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Digoxin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification; Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liter per hour | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Metformin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liter per hour | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Rosuvastatin | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liter per hour | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 2: Apparent Total Body Clearance From Plasma (CL/F) of Sumatriptan | CL/f was calculated as Dose/AUC0-inf, where AUC0-inf was estimated by determining the total area under the curve of the concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity. AUC0-inf was calculated as AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z, where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clast pred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liter per hour | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Digoxin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on digoxin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liters | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Metformin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z was the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liters | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Rosuvastatin | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on rosuvastatin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liters | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 2: Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Phase (Vz/F) of Sumatriptan | Vz/f: the distribution of a study drug between plasma and the rest of the body after oral dosing. For single dose Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-inf*Lambda Z), where AUC0-inf = (AUC0-tlast + Clast pred/Lambda Z), where AUC0-tlast was the AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification. Calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down); Clastpred was the calculated plasma concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration was at or above the LLQ and Lambda Z = the apparent terminal rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on sumatriptan in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liters | Pre-dose, 0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Cumulative Amount Excreted (CAE) From Time Zero to the End of the Collection Interval After Dosing Dosing (Ae0-36) of Metformin | Ae0-36 was calculated as the cumulative amount excreted from time zero (= dosing time) to the end of the collection interval after dosing, for metformin only. The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | milligrams (mg) | Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Part 1: Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin | CLr was calculated as Ae0-36 divided by AUC0-36, for metformin only. AUC0-36: AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to 36 hours post-dose (metformin only) calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down). The transporter cocktail included digoxin, metformin, and rosuvastatin. As pre-specified in protocol, data was analyzed and reported to characterize the effect of evobrutinib on metformin in this outcome measure. | PK population included all participants who have completed the study without any relevant protocol deviations and factors likely to affect the comparability of PK results, with adequate study intervention compliance. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | liter per hour | Pre-dose, 0 to 4, 4 to 8, 8 to 12; 12 to 24 hours post-dose on Days 1 and 10 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 7 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Part 1: Evobrutinib | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 4 to 12 in Part 1 under fed conditions. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 9 | 20 |
| EG002 | Part 1: Evobrutinib + Cocktail | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and cocktail (digoxin 0.25 mg tablet, metformin 10 mg solution, rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet) on Day 10 in Part 1 under fed conditions. | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 6 | 19 |
| EG003 | Part 2: Sumatriptan | Participants received single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 1 in Part 2 under fed conditions. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 20 |
| EG004 | Part 2: Evobrutinib | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day on Days 2 to 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 20 |
| EG005 | Part 2: Evobrutinib + Sumatriptan | Participants received Evobrutinib film-coated tablets, at a dose of 45 mg, orally, twice a day and single oral dose of Sumatriptan 25 mg tablet on Day 8 in Part 2 under fed conditions. | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 8 | 20 |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abnormal faeces | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Faeces soft | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Periorbital haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lipase increased | Investigations | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Polymenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry throat | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear discomfort | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blepharospasm | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye irritation | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Mucosal dryness | General disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Burning sensation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vulvovaginal dryness | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | MedDRA Version 24.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D013256 |
| Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D001645 | Biguanides |
| D006146 | Guanidines |
| D000578 | Amidines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D013449 | Sulfonamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D005464 | Fluorobenzenes |
| D006845 | Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D013450 | Sulfones |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D014363 | Tryptamines |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| Participants with Serious TEAEs |
|
| Moderate TEAEs |
|
| Severe TEAEs |
|