Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main aim of this study is to compare thoracic paravertebral block and rhomboid block for postoperative analgesia and analgesic usage in thoracic surgeries.
Patients with scheduled thoracic surgery are going to be enrolled for this study. Patients will be randomized and separated in two groups. Group I will receive thoracic paravertebral block, group II will receive rhomboid block. Each group will receive patient controlled analgesia with intravenous fentanyl. Patients will be monitored at postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th hours and their VAS scores, adverse reactions like nausea and vomiting, total analgesic usage, additional analgesic need and time of the first report of pain will be filed. Then the two groups will be compared and evaluated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Active Comparator | Group I will consist of randomly assigned patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. These patients will recieve paravertebral block which is already proven to be effective in postoperative pain. After applying standart monitors to the patient and proper positioning in the operating room, paravertebral block will be performed at the planned surgical side using high frequency (8-18 MHz) linear probe of GE Logiq S7 (General Electric Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered into the paravertebral space at T5-T6 vertebra levels using a 50 mm 22 G block needle (BBraun, Melsungen, Germany). |
|
| Group II | Experimental | Group II will consist of randomly assigned patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. These patients will recieve rhomboid block which is being experimented for its efficacy in postoperative pain. After applying standart monitors to the patient and proper positioning in the operating room, rhomboid block will be performed at the planned surgical side using high frequency (8-18 MHz) linear probe of GE Logiq S7 (General Electric Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered into the plane between rhomboid muscle and intercostal muscles, medial to scapula at T5-T6 vertebra levels using a 50 mm 22 G block needle (BBraun, Melsungen, Germany). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thoracic Paravertebral Block | Procedure | Paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores between two groups | Statistically significant difference in VAS scores at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th hours between two groups. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst imaginable pain. | 24 hours |
| Difference in additional analgesic usage between two groups | Intravenous patient controlled analgesia usage and additional analgesic dosages will be filed as miligrams or micrograms at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th hours. | 24 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of nausea and vomiting | Incidence of symptoms like nausea and vomiting will be filed at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th hours. On a scale of 0 to 1, where 0 means no symptoms and 1 means nausea and vomiting. | 24 hours |
| Patient satisfaction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koç University | Istanbul | 34010 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33198430 | Background | Ciftci B, Ekinci M, Atalay YO. Ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block provides effective pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a brief report of three cases. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Aug;74(4):355-357. doi: 10.4097/kja.20538. Epub 2020 Nov 17. No abstract available. | |
| 32470838 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Data collected for the study, including de-identified individual participant data will be made available to other within 6 months after the publication of this trial, as will additional related documents (study protocol, statistical analysis plan and informed consent form), for academic purposes (e.g., meta-analyses), upon request to the corresponding author, and with a signed data access agreement.
6 months after the publication
Academic purposes
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Rhomboid Block | Procedure | Rhomboid block for postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery |
|
Patient will be reevaluated at 24th hour for analgesic satisfaction. On a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 means not satisfied and 3 means satisfied.
| 24 hours |
| Longo F, Piliego C, Martuscelli M, Tomaselli E, Crucitti P, Longo F, Agro FE. Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block for intubated uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Oct;65:109881. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109881. Epub 2020 May 26. No abstract available. |
| 31668692 | Background | Longo F, Piliego C. Rhomboid intercostal and subserratus plane block for non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109612. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Oct 24. No abstract available. |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |