Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Twente | OTHER |
| Abbott | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale: Peripheral arterial disease is a severe clinical problem with an increasing prevalence, due to an ageing population. Endovascular treatment, usually using stents, is recommended for most lesions in the femoropopliteal tract. The patency of these stents is influenced by several factors, including stent sizing and stent positioning.
Current procedural planning of femoropopliteal disease is primarily based on single-plane digital subtraction angiographies (DSA). This modality provides a 2-dimensional image of the vessel lumen, which may be suboptimal for stent sizing. It can therefore be difficult to choose the optimal stent position as minor lesions may be missed. Suboptimal treatment could result in unfavourable levels of wall shear stress causing the vessel wall to be more susceptible to neo-intimal hyperplasia ultimately causing restenosis and stent failure. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) is able to visualize the arterial wall with a micrometer resolution, which could result in better stent sizing. Furthermore, OCT is able to visualize different layers in the vessel wall and identify unhealthy areas, which may lead to a more optimal stent placement as unhealthy areas can be covered completely. Moreover, OCT provides detailed patient-specific geometries necessary to develop reliable computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models that simulate blood flow in stented arteries and calculate wall shear stresses, which could predict stent patency.
Objective: To investigate in a clinical study how often the use of intravascular optical coherence tomography for femoropopliteal stenotic lesions leads to alterations in treatment planning before and after stent placement, in comparison to traditional digital subtraction angiography-based treatment planning.
Study design: Exploratory observational study. Study population: 25 patients with femoropopliteal stenotic lesions who are treated with a Supera interwoven nitinol stent or Absolute nitinol stent.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The percentage of procedures in which OCT changed the DSA-based treatment planning before and after stent placement to investigate the impact of OCT imaging on treatment planning.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete cohort | In all patients included in the study subsequent optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements will be performed pre and post stent placement. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optical coherence tomography measurements | Device | Optical coherence tomography measurements in femoropopliteal tract |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changed treatment planning based on OCT | The percentage of procedures in which the OCT changed the DSA-based treatment planning before and after stent placement to investigate the impact of OCT imaging on treatment planning. | Immediately following the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Presence of artefacts in CTA scan | The presence of artefacts will be used to determine the image quality of the CTA scan | 6-8 weeks after the procedure |
| Presence of artefacts in OCT scan | The presence of artefacts will be used to determine the image quality of the OCT scan |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients diagnosed with one or more stenotic lesions in the femoropopliteal tract that are scheduled for endovascular treatment with a Supera interwoven nitonol stent or Absolute nitinol stent.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michel Reijnen, MD, prof | Rijnstate Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rijnstate | Arnhem | Gelderland | 6815 AD | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Immediately following the procedure |
| Segmented vessel lumen based on CTA scan | The vessel lumen in the CTA scan will be segmented to obtain a patient-specific geometry. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Segmented vessel lumen based on OCT scan | The vessel lumen in the OCT scan will be segmented to obtain a patient-specific geometry. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Correlation CTA-based and OCT-based vessel lumen segmentations | The obtained CTA-based segmentation will be compared to the OCT-based segmentation. The vessel radius along the blood vessel for both the CTA-based and OCT-based segmentation will be compared point-by-point after which the correlation beteen both segmentations will be obtained | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Velocity streamlines obtained from CTA-based CFD simulation | Velocity streamlines are calculated using a computational fluid dynamics model based on the CTA-based vessel lumen segmentation. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Time averaged wall shear stress obtained from CTA-based CFD simulation | The second parameter calculated using the CTA-based CFD simulation is the time averaged wall shear stress. This is the wall shear stress averagerd over one heartbeat. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Velocity streamlines obtained from OCT-based CFD simulation | Velocity streamlines are calculated using a computational fluid dynamics model based on the OCT-based vessel lumen segmentation. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Time averaged wall shear stress obtained from OCT-based CFD simulation | The second parameter calculated using the OCT-based CFD simulation is the time averaged wall shear stress. This is the wall shear stress averagerd over one heartbeat. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Late luminal loss | Defined as the vessel diameter right after procedure minus the vessel diameter during follow-up | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Correlation between late luminal loss and CTA-based CFD | The regions with late luminal loss will be compared to regions with disturbed velocity streamlines and low time averaged wall shear stress (<0.4 Pa) calculated with the CTA-based CFD. This correlation shows how well the CTA-based CFD model can predict late luminal loss. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |
| Correlation between late luminal loss and OCT-based CFD | The regions with late luminal loss will be compared to regions with disturbed velocity streamlines and low time averaged wall shear stress (<0.4 Pa) calculated with the OCT-based CFD. This correlation shows how well the OCT-based CFD model can predict late luminal loss. | Up to 2 years after the procedure |