| Primary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed Per RECIST v1.1 | Evaluation of the antitumor effects of RMC-4630 and sotorasib in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with KRASG12C mutation with and without co-existing genetic aberrations in specific genes such as STK11/LKB1, KEAP1, and PIK3CA after failure of prior standard therapy. Objective Response Rate (%) is defined as the proportion of patients with Best Overall Response of confirmed CR, or PR. Response was confirmed by a repeat assessment no less than 28 days. | Objective Response Rate (%) is defined as the proportion of patients with Best Overall Response of confirmed CR, or PR. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | |
| |
| Secondary | Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Characterization of the safety, tolerability of RMC-4630 in combination with sotorasib for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | No | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg BIW D1D2 and Sotorasib 960 mg QD Safety-Run in, Optimization, Expansion | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
|
| Secondary | Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Tests | Characterization of the safety, tolerability of RMC-4630 in combination with sotorasib for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | No | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
|
| Secondary | Clinically Significant Changes in ECGs | Characterization of the safety, tolerability of RMC-4630 in combination with sotorasib for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
|
| Secondary | Trough and Approximate Peak Concentrations of RMC-4630 | Characterization of PK of RMC-4630 in combination with sotorasib for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC. | Summary of PK of RMC-4630 concentration for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC (All Treated Subjects). Timepoints beyond Cycle 4 do not any value for the PK profile per sponsor. The decreasing number in participants analyzed is due to various factors such as missed samples or patient drop out as timepoints progressed. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng/ml | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
|
| Secondary | Trough and Approximate Peak Concentrations of Sotorasib | Characterization of PK of RMC-4630 in combination with Sotorasib for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC | Summary of PK of Sotorasib concentration for subjects with KRASG12C mutant NSCLC (All Treated Subjects). Timepoints beyond Cycle 4 do not any value for the PK profile per sponsor. The decreasing number in participants analyzed is due to various factors such as missed samples or patient drop out as timepoints progressed. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng/mL | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. |
|
| Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed Per RECIST v1.1 | Characterization of efficacy or RMC-4630 in combination with Sotorasib as assessed by DOR, DCR, PFS, and OS in patients with KRAS G12C-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | Duration of Response (DOR) Based on Investigator Assessments (Subjects with Confirmed CR or PR Responders only). | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Assessed Per RECIST v.1.1 | Characterization of efficacy or RMC-4630 in combination with Sotorasib as assessed by DOR, DCR, PFS, and OS in patients with KRAS G12C-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | Disease Control Rate (%) is defined as the proportion of subjects with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed Per RECIST v1.1 | Characterization of efficacy or RMC-4630 in combination with Sotorasib as assessed by DOR, DCR, PFS, and OS in patients with KRAS G12C-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | Summary of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessments (All Treated Subjects). | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | Characterization of efficacy or RMC-4630 in combination with Sotorasib as assessed by DOR, DCR, PFS, and OS in patients with KRAS G12C-mutant locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy | Summary of Overall Survival (OS) (All Treated Subjects). | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD |
|
| Secondary | Incidence, Nature and Severity of TEAEs, SAEs | Characterization of the safety, tolerability of RMC-4630 in combination with sotorasib for patients with KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC after failure of prior standard therapy. The specifics of the incidence, nature and severity data can be found under the Adverse Events section. | | Posted | | Number | | participants | | 31 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | RMC-4630 140 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | The two arms have been broken down per dose level rather than by phase or cohort per the CSR, which is provided to FDA and not uploaded to ct.gov. Participants were administered 140 or 200 mg of RMC-4630 twice weekly (BIW) on D1D2 of each week in a 21-day cycle and Sotorasib 960 mg once daily (QD) in a 21-day cycle. The 140mg and 200mg dose levels were explored at the safety run-in stage, and after completion of the safety run-in (DLT clearance) of both dose levels, additional patients were enrolled at both dose levels for the purpose of dose optimization before selecting the final expansion dose. Therefore, both the 140mg and 200mg dose levels included patients in the safety-run in and dose optimization. After that, 200mg was identified as the RP2D dose, which moved to the expansion phase. Statistical analysis for all sections in the results was performed for all treated patients by dose level, i.e., 140mg vs 200mg. For patients enrolled at the RP2D dose level of 200mg, analysis was further performed based on mutation status, i.e., cohorts 1 vs 2. | | OG001 | RMC-4630 200 mg BIW D1D2 + Sotorasib 960 mg QD | |
|