Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5U01HL088942 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial comparing mitral valve (MV) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) to surgical repair (1:1 ratio) in patients with primary, degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). The trial will be conducted in the U.S., Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, and is designed as a strategy trial. Thus, all devices legally marketed for TEER of primary degenerative MR in a particular country are eligible to be used in this trial.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of MV TEER compared with surgical repair in patients with primary, degenerative MR. The secondary aim is to analyze the relationship between the adequacy of MR correction at one-year post intervention and longer-term clinical outcomes (death, heart failure hospitalizations/urgent care visits, valve re-interventions, and quality of life). The tertiary aim of this trial is to evaluate a range of patient-centered outcomes (quality of life, functional status, and discharge location) of transcatheter edge-to-edge MV repair compared with MV surgical repair in patients with primary, degenerative mitral regurgitation. This study is closely integrated with the PRIMARY Ancillary Substudy (NCT07103733)
The patient population for this trial consists of adult patients with severe, primary degenerative MR for whom the local heart team has verified that an indication for MV intervention is present and for whom both transcatheter edge-to-edge and surgical repair strategies are anatomically feasible.
Because the use of the commercial edge-to-edge mitral repair device in the U.S. is approved only in patients considered to be at prohibitive risk of MV surgery by a heart team, use of such devices in this trial is considered investigational by the FDA. As such, this trial will be conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE).
Outcomes will be measured from randomization over a period of 5 years post intervention. The estimated enrollment period is 36 months, and all patients will be followed from randomization for up to 10 years post intervention for particular endpoints. Long-term follow-up will include leveraging administrative datasets linked to clinical trial data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical mitral valve repair | Active Comparator | Patients who are randomized to the surgical arm will undergo mitral surgery. |
|
| Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair | Active Comparator | In the transcatheter edge-to-edge repair arm, patients will be treated with a commercially-approved edge-to-edge mitral repair device. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitral valve repair | Procedure | Patients who are randomized to the surgical arm will undergo mitral surgery. Mitral surgery will be conducted using general anesthesia and cardiopulmonary bypass. Mitral surgery may be performed via a sternotomy or a right thoracotomy approach with or without robotic assistance. Standard techniques commonly include a ring or band annuloplasty to correct and prevent annular dilatation; leaflet prolapse and redundancy may be corrected by leaflet resection techniques and / or chordal reconstruction. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality, valve re-intervention, hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure, or onset of ≥ 2+ MR (by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)) composite score. | All-cause mortality, valve re-intervention, hospitalizations/urgent visits for heart failure (without a blanking period), or onset of ≥ 2+ MR (by transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE)) from randomization to a minimum of 3 years post intervention. Composite score will be expressed as a Z-score - The Z-Score is a statistical measurement of a score's relationship to the mean in a group of scores. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the mean, with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher than the mean. | 3 years post intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adequacy of MR correction | Adequacy of MR correction at one year post intervention, defined as < 2+ MR as assessed by TTE | one year post intervention |
| Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) |
Not provided
The patient population for this trial consists of adults with severe, primary degenerative MR for whom the local heart team has verified that an indication for MV intervention is present and for whom both transcatheter edge-to-edge and surgical repair strategies are anatomically feasible. Specific inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed below. All patients who meet eligibility criteria will be included in the study regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joanna Chikwe, MD | Cedars Sinai | Study Director |
| Martin Leon, MD | Columbia University | Study Director |
| Patrick O'Gara, MD | Brigham and Women's Hospital | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States | ||
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| PRIMARY Ancillary Substudy | View source |
Not provided
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
De-identified study data sets must be submitted to the designated NHLBI Program Official no later than 3 years after the end of the clinical activity (final patient follow-up, etc.) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first. Data are prepared by the study coordinating center and sent to the designated PO for review prior to release.
Anyone who wishes to access the data. Any purpose. Data are available indefinitely at link included in the URL field below.
Not provided
Eligible and consented patients will be randomized 1:1 to a TEER versus surgical repair. Patient randomization will be stratified by clinical site and by surgical risk profile, namely low, intermediate, and high surgical risk. Primary effectiveness will be analyzed by intention-to-treat; that is, the patients will be grouped by their assignment at randomization whether or not they actually received the treatment to which they were assigned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair | Device | Patients will be treated with a commercially-approved edge-to-edge mitral repair device. The steerable guide catheter (guide) is inserted into the femoral vein and advanced across the inter-atrial septum using image guided puncture. Fluoroscopic and echocardiographic guidance will be used to visualize the devices and assess the repair. The guide is positioned over the MV and the clip/clasp delivery system is inserted into the guide and positioned over the MV in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The delivery catheter is advanced until the clip/clasp emerges from the tip of the guide into the left atrium. The catheter is manipulated using the control handle until the clip/clasp is correctly oriented with respect to the line of coaptation of the mitral valve. The clip/clasp is opened, and advanced across the mitral valve into the left ventricle then pulled back to grasp the leaflets. |
|
|
Disease-specific quality of life as measured by the KCCQ at 6-month time intervals up to 5 years. KCCQ has 23 items that map to 7 domains: symptom frequency; symptom burden; symptom stability; physical limitations; social limitations; quality of life; and self-efficacy. The symptom frequency and symptom burden domains are merged into a total symptom score, which can be combined with the physical limitation domain to create a clinical summary score. All scores are scaled 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health outcome.
| up to 10 years post intervention |
| Procedure failure | Procedure failure defined as residual moderately severe or severe (3+ or 4+/4+) MR at the end of the procedure, or conversion of a TEER to an open surgical repair or replacement, or conversion of a surgical mitral valve repair to a mitral valve replacement procedure. | End of procedure |
| Procedure failure | Procedure failure defined as residual moderately severe or severe (3+ or 4+/4+) MR at the end of the procedure, or conversion of a TEER to an open surgical repair or replacement, or conversion of a surgical mitral valve repair to a mitral valve replacement procedure. | 10 years post randomization |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality through 5 years post randomization | 5 years post randomization |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality from randomization through 10 years post intervention | 10 years post intervention |
| Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality | Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality from randomization through 5 years post intervention | 5 years post intervention |
| Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality | Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality from randomization through 10 years post intervention | 10 years post intervention |
| Valve re-interventions | Valve re-interventions through 5 years post intervention | 5 years post intervention |
| Valve re-interventions | Valve re-interventions through 10 years post intervention | 10 years post intervention |
| Serious or protocol-defined adverse events | Serious or protocol-defined adverse events, including stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and renal failure, through 5 years | 5 years post intervention |
| MR grade | Mitral Regurgitation (MR) grade as mild, moderate, or severe. (grade I-IV, with higher grade indicating poorer health outcomes.) | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of how much blood is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD) | Left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD) is the diameter across the left ventricle of the heart at the end of diastole, that is, when the heart muscle is maximally relaxed, and usually corresponds to its largest diameter. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) | Left ventricular end systolic dimension (LVESD) is the diameter across the left ventricle of the heart at the end of systole, that is, when the heart muscle is maximally contracted, and usually corresponds to its smallest diameter. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV) | Left Ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of the diastole or ventricular filling. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV) | Left Ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of the systolic ejection phase immediately before the beginning of diastole or ventricular filling. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Mitral valve gradient | The valve gradient is the difference in pressure on each side of the valve. When a valve is narrowed (a condition called stenosis), the pressure on the front of the valve builds up as blood is forced through the narrow opening. This causes a larger pressure difference between the front and back of the valve. The valve gradient can be used to determine the severity of the valve disorder. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| Forward stroke volume | The forward stroke volume is the volume entering the aorta. | up to 6 years post intervention |
| 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) | Functional status as measured by the 6MWT at yearly time intervals over 5 years. 6MT - The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes | up to 5 years post intervention |
| EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) | Generic QoL as measured by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The EQ-5D descriptive system is a preference-based HRQL measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers given to ED-5D permit to find 243 unique health states or can be converted into EQ- 5D index an utility scores anchored at 0 for death and 1 for perfect health. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), by which respondents can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status). | through 10 years post intervention |
| Length of stay (LOS) | Length of stay as measured by number of days hospitalized. | through 10 years post intervention |
| ICU days of index hospitalization | Number of ICU days of index hospitalization | through 10 years post intervention |
| Number and reasons for readmissions | Number and reasons for readmissions, including for valve re-intervention and readmissions/urgent visits for heart failure | through 10 years post intervention |
| Cost | Costs associated with the index hospitalization as well as follow-up readmissions will be measured. | through 10 years post intervention |
| Cost-effectiveness | A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing cumulative costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair vs surgical repair will be performed from U.S., Canadian, German and United Kingdom health care sector perspectives according to national guidelines. | through 10 years post intervention |
| Number of participants with stroke with disability | Stroke with disability is defined as a modified Rankin score of ≥ 2 and/or major bleeding (BARC Type 3b, 3c and 5) by 30 days post-intervention | 30 days post-intervention |
| Cedars Sinai Medical Center |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90048 |
| United States |
| University of California San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| Stanford University | Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Piedmont Heart Institute | Atlanta | Georgia | 30309 | United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Ochsner Clinic | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| Maine Medical Center | Portland | Maine | 04102 | United States |
| The Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Brigham and Women's | Boston | Massachusetts | 02115 | United States |
| University of Michigan Hospital | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City/MidAmerica Heart and Lung Surgeons | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| Weill Cornell Medicine/ New York-Presbyterian Hospital | New York | New York | 10065 | United States |
| Northwell Health | New York | New York | 21287 | United States |
| Duke University Hospital | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Baylor, Scott and White | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| University of Virginia Medical Center | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22903 | United States |
| West Virginia University Hospital | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| University of British Columbia, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital | Vancouver | British Columbia | BC V6E 1M7 | Canada |
| London Health Sciences | London | Ontario | ON N6A 5W9 | Canada |
| University of Ottawa Heart Institute | Ottawa | Ontario | K1Y 4W7 | Canada |
| Unity Health Toronto (St. Michael's Hospital) | Toronto | Ontario | M5B 1W8St | Canada |
| Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (Laval University) | Québec | Quebec | QC G1V 4G5 | Canada |
| Universitätsklinikum Köln | Cologne | Berlin-kölnische Allee | 50969 | Germany |
| Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW | Bad Oeynhausen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 32545 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Köln | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50937 | Germany |
| Kerckhoff Klinik Bad Nauheim | Bad Nauheim | 61231 | Germany |
| Schüchtermann-Klinik Bad Rothenfelde | Bad Rothenfelde | 49214 | Germany |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité | Berlin | 13353 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt | Frankfurt | 60590 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Freiburg | Freiburg im Breisgau | 79106 | Germany |
| Asklepios Klinik St. Georg Hamburg | Hamburg | 20099 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf | Hamburg | 20246 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | Heidelberg | 69120 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Jena | Jena | 07747 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Leipzig | Leipzig | 04289 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck | Lübeck | 23538 | Germany |
| Deutsches Herzzentrum München | München | 80636 | Germany |
| Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro | Vigo | Galacia | 36204 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinic De Barcelona | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínico San Carlos | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital Central de Asturias | Oviedo | 33011 | Spain |
| Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | Cambridge | England | CB2 0AY | United Kingdom |
| The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust | Leeds | England | LS1 3EX | United Kingdom |
| St. Thomas Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London | England | SE1 7EH | United Kingdom |
| King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | London | England | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
| Royal Brompton and Harefield Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust | London | England | SW3 6NP | United Kingdom |
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | Manchester | England | M23 9LT | United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust | Worthing | West Sussex | BN2 5BE | United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust | Birmingham | B15 2TH | United Kingdom |
| Golden Jubilee University National Hospital | Clydebank | G81 4DY | United Kingdom |
| Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Headington | OX3 9DU | United Kingdom |
| Barts Health NHS Trust | London | E1 8PR | United Kingdom |
| South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Middlesbrough | TS4 3BW | United Kingdom |
| South Tees Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | Middlesbrough | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008944 | Mitral Valve Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058386 | Mitral Valve Annuloplasty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058385 | Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty |
| D006348 | Cardiac Surgical Procedures |
| D013504 | Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019616 | Thoracic Surgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided