Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| FRAXA Research Foundation | OTHER |
| Purposeful IKE | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Ergoloid mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and the combination (EM + 5-HTP) compared to placebo in males aged 18-45 years old with Fragile X Syndrome.
This single-center, Phase 2, single-blind, 4-period sequential study will enroll 15 males Fragile X Syndrome, ages 18-45 years old.
The study will begin with a Screening period of up to 28 days. During screening, participants and their parent/legal authorized guardian, if indicated, will review and sign an Informed Consent/Assent form prior to any study procedures being performed. Following confirmation of a prior diagnosis for Fragile X, information will be collected to further assess their eligibility.
Participants who meet entry criteria and agree to participate will proceed to a Baseline visit. At the Baseline visit (Period 1/Day 1), cognitive, behavioral, ERP and eye tracking assessments will be performed to assess current functioning.
The Baseline visit will be followed by four 4-week single-blind treatment periods. During treatment periods, participants will be placed on a different treatment regimen every 4 weeks (listed below). Throughout all 4 periods, participants will take two identical capsules three times a day. If only taking one study drug, they will take one placebo pill with the drug at each dose, and in period 4, they will take two placebo pills at each dose.
Participants will return to the clinic at the end of each treatment period at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 and cognitive and behavioral evaluations will be repeated at these clinic visits. Safety and tolerability assessments will include adverse event monitoring, vital signs, blood chemistry and hematology, and urinalysis. Additionally, participants will be monitored for adverse events via a telephone call at the end of Week 1 of each Period, and one week following completion of Period 4 or following early discontinuation. Total study participation will last up to 21 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ergoloid mesylates (EM) | Experimental | During treatment period 1, subjects will receive EM 1 mg (Medisca) and matching placebo for 5-HTP 100mg (ascorbic acid powder). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
|
| Ergoloid mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) | Experimental | During treatment period 2, subjects will receive EM 1 mg (Medisca) and 5-HTP 100 mg (5-HTP, Basic Vitamins). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
|
| 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) | Experimental | During treatment period 3, subjects will receive 5-HTP 100 mg (5-HTP, Basic Vitamins) and matching placebo for EM 1 mg (ascorbic acid powder). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | During treatment period 4, subjects will receive matching placebo for EM 1mg (ascorbic acid powder) and matching placebo for 5-Hydroxytryptophan 100mg (ascorbic acid powder). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Hydroxytryptophan | Drug | 5-HTP will be over-encapsulated in identical size 00 capsules. During the 5-HTP Treatment Period (Period 3) and 5-HTP/EM Treatment Period (Period 2), subjects will take 1 capsule of 5-HTP 3 times per day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be recorded from the time of the subject's first dose of study drug to the end of the study (Week 17) or longer if needed. Adverse events will be assessed at each visit as well as during each phone call and will be tabulated for each treatment period. | Baseline through Week 17 |
| Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be tabulated for each treatment period. The Investigator is responsible for assessing the severity (intensity) of each adverse event as mild, moderate, or severe according to the following definitions: Mild - An event that is easily tolerated and generally not interfering with normal daily activities. Moderate - An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal daily activities. Severe - An event that is incapacitating with inability to work or perform normal daily activities. | Baseline through Week 17 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in KiTAP Executive Battery - Alertness Subscore (Reaction Time) | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The alertness subtest requires subjects to tap a button every time a stimulus appears on the screen. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean reaction time was measured over 90 seconds and change from baseline was calculated. A lower reaction time (net decrease in reaction time) indicates better performance. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
History of, or current cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, respiratory, gastrointestinal, psychiatric, neurologic, cerebrovascular, or other systemic disease that would place the participant at risk or potentially interfere with the interpretation of the safety, tolerability, or efficacy of the study medication.
Common diseases such as mild hypertension, well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1C [Hgb A1C] <6.5%), etc. are allowed per the investigator's judgment as long as they are stable and controlled by medical therapy that is constant for at least 4 weeks before randomization.
Clinically significant abnormalities, in the investigator's judgment, in safety laboratory tests, vital signs, as measured during Screening.
History of substance abuse within the past year, according to investigator assessment.
Use of CYP3A4 inhibitors, beta-blockers, MAO inhibitors or triptans at any time during participation in the study.
Significant hearing or visual impairment that may affect the participant's ability to complete the test procedures.
Concurrent major psychiatric condition (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder) as diagnosed by the investigator. Participants with additional diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder or Anxiety Disorder will be allowed as these are characteristics of FXS.
Participant has active diseases that would interfere with participation, such as acquired immunodeficiency disorder, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, or tuberculosis.
Participant is planning to commence psychotherapy or cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) during the period of the study or had begun psychotherapy or CBT within 4 weeks prior to Screening.
Participant has participated in another clinical trial within the 30 days preceding Screening.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, MD, PhD | Rush University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rush University Medical Center | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Adult Males With Fragile X Syndrome | Fifteen participants with Fragile X syndrome ages 18-45 years old will be enrolled in this single-blind study. Eligible participants will be started on EM for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 1, then will take EM and 5-HTP for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 2, then, 5-HTP for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 3, then placebo for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 4. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening Period |
| |||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 1: EM & Placebo |
| |||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 2: EM & 5-HTP |
| |||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 3: 5-HTP & Placebo |
| |||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 4: Placebo |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Adult Males With Fragile X Syndrome | Fifteen participants with Fragile X syndrome ages 18-45 years old will be enrolled in this single-blind study. Eligible participants will be started on EM for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 1, then will take EM and 5-HTP for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 2, then, 5-HTP for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 3, then placebo for 4 weeks in Treatment Period 4. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability - Number of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be recorded from the time of the subject's first dose of study drug to the end of the study (Week 17) or longer if needed. Adverse events will be assessed at each visit as well as during each phone call and will be tabulated for each treatment period. | The Safety population will include all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. | Posted | Number | Number of Adverse Events | Baseline through Week 17 |
|
Adverse events, which include abnormal and clinically significant clinical laboratory test variables, will be monitored and documented from the time Informed Consent until study participation is complete, 1 week after the final study visit (~21 weeks total).
Participants who experience AEs will be monitored with relevant clinical assessments and laboratory tests, as determined by the Investigator. Per good medical practice, all AEs must be followed to satisfactory resolution or stabilization of the event(s), or, if a chronic condition, until fully characterized. Participants who have non-serious AEs that are ongoing at study completion or study withdrawal must be followed until resolution of the AEs or for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ergoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) | Ergoloid mesylates (EM) 1 mg three times daily and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) 100 mg three times daily for 4 weeks 5-Hydroxytryptophan / Vitamin B6: 5-hydroxytryptophan, also known as 5-HTP has a nutraceutical status and has never been approved as a drug for any indication, but as a dietary supplement has been used extensively for several disorders for many years such as in the therapy of depression, fibromyalgia, obesity, insomnia and chronic headache Ergoloid Mesylate: Ergoloid Mesylates, trade name Hydergine, is a mixture of the methanesulfonate salts of three dihydrogenated ergot alkaloids, dihydroergocristine, dihydroergocornine, and alpha- and beta-dihydroergocryptine. Ergot alkaloids are dopamine agonists which activate dopamine receptors (in the basal ganglia and other parts of the brain involved in motor function) and a prolactin inhibitor. Ergot is a strong vasoconstrictor and thus helps to reduce bleeding by narrowing of the blood vessels. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased Irritability | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, MD PhD | Rush University Medical Center | 312-942-4036 | Elizabeth_Berry-Kravis@rush.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 23, 2022 | Mar 23, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005600 | Fragile X Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D038901 | X-Linked Intellectual Disability |
| D008607 | Intellectual Disability |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006916 | 5-Hydroxytryptophan |
| D004877 | Ergoloid Mesylates |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014364 | Tryptophan |
| D024322 | Amino Acids, Aromatic |
| D000598 | Amino Acids, Cyclic |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
Not provided
Not provided
This study will use a single-blind, 4-period sequential design. Fifteen participants with Fragile X Syndrome ages 18-45 years will enter a Screening period of up to 28 days followed by four 4 week single-blind treatment periods (summarized below).
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-blind study, meaning the participant and his family/caregivers will not know what drug or combination the participant is receiving during each time period. The investigator and study coordinator will know what drug the participant is taking. The remainder of the study team performing assessments such as the Vineland, eye tracking, ERP, Toolbox, and the KiTAP will not know the type of treatment the patient is on when testing is done.
|
| Ergoloid Mesylates | Drug | Ergoloid mesylates 1 mg will be mixed with methyl cellulose and placed in a size 00 capsule. During the EM Treatment Period (Period 1) and 5-HTP/EM Treatment Period (Period 2), subjects will take 1 capsule of EM 3 times per day. |
|
|
| Matching placebo for Ergoloid mesylates | Drug | Matching placebo for Ergoloid mesylates will be ascorbic acid powder in identical size 00 capsules. During the 5-HTP Treatment Period (Period 3) and Placebo Treatment Period (Period 4), subjects will take 1 capsule of matching placebo for EM 3 times per day. |
|
| Matching placebo for 5-Hydroxytryptophan | Drug | Matching placebo for 5-Hydroxytryptophan will be ascorbic acid powder in identical size 00 capsules. During the EM Treatment Period (Period 2) and Placebo Treatment Period (Period 4), subjects will take 1 capsule of matching placebo for 5-HTP 3 times per day. |
|
| Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale Overall Score | The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is a global measure to provide a clinical judgment of a participant's overall condition based on a trained clinician's assessment of cognition, behavior and activities of daily living. The clinician compares the subject with individuals of the same age and sex. The assessment of severity is with a 7-point scale: 1, not ill; 2, very mild; 3, mild; 4, moderate; 5, marked; 6, severe; 7, extremely severe. A net decrease in severity score over time indicates a positive outcome. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Subscores | This assessment is a parent/caregiver-rated scale with six subscales to assess irritability, stereotypes, lethargy, hyperactivity, inappropriate speech, and social avoidance, using ABC-FX factoring system. The ABC was was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean score for each subscale was measured and change from baseline was calculated. Lower mean scores on each subscale indicate fewer aberrant behaviors (better functioning).The range of possible scores on each subscale are irritability (0-54), lethargy (0-39), stereotypes (0-18), hyperactivity (0-30), inappropriate speech (0-12), and social avoidance (0-12). | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS) Subscores | The ADAMS is a parent/caregiver rated scale with five subscores to assess manic/hyperactive behavior, depressed mood, social avoidance, general anxiety, and obsessive/compulsive behavior. The ADAMs was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean score for each subscale was recorded, and change from baseline was calculated for each subscore. The range of possible scores for each subscale is 0-21. Lower mean scores on each subscale indicate better functioning. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline on Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Scale - Subdomain Growth Scale Values | VABS-3 is a clinician-administered standardized interview. For this study, we collected data in domains of communication (receptive & written language), daily living skills (domestic & community skills), & socialization (interpersonal relationships, play & leisure time, & coping abilities). This assessment was administered at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Mean growth scale value (GSV) for each subdomain was recorded at each time point and change from baseline was calculated. The possible GSVs for each subdomain are receptive (10-162), written (10-163), domestic (10-110), community (10-136), interpersonal (10-152), play and leisure (10-164), & coping skills (10-120). Higher GSVs for each subdomain indicate better functioning. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery for Intellectual Disabilities (NIH-TCB) Total Cognition Score | The NIH-TCB is a battery of extensively validated computer-administered cognitive tests. The NIH-TCB includes 7 evaluations measuring cognitive flexibility, inhibition & visual attention, episodic memory, immediate recall & sequencing of different visually & orally presented stimuli, processing speed, recognition of letters and words, & receptive vocabulary. This assessment was administered at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). This battery produces fluid and crystallized cognition composite scores. The Total Cognition Composite Score is found by converting raw fluid and crystallized scores to standard scores, averaging these two scores, then deriving standard scores based on this new distribution. Scores range from 0-140. The normative mean of the uncorrected standard score is 100 and the standard deviation is 15. A higher mean total cognition composite score indicates better performance. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Assessment Domain Scores | IIn an attempt to measure the level of behavioral difficulty experienced by the parent/caregiver with respect to the child with FXS, the VAS allows parents to mark on a visual line measuring 10 cm with one side marked "worst behavior" and the other side marked "best behavior." The caregiver rated the participant's behavior with respect to three domains: daily functioning, anxiety/irritability and language. Distances closer to 10 cm are considered worse behavior and distances closer to 0 cm are considered better behavior. Average distance of the mark was recorded for each domain at Baseline then again at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Change from baseline was calculated for each domain. Lower scores indicate a better outcome (closer distance to best behavior side). | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Event-Related Potentials (ERP) - Gamma Band Absolute Power at Resting State (Frontal) | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Gamma 1 and gamma 2 waves were measured for various parts of the brain at a resting state. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (at the end of each treatment period). Mean power of gamma 1 and gamma 2 bands, measured by frontal EEG leads, was recorded for each time point and change from baseline was calculated. FXS patients have typically been found to exhibit greater gamma frequency band power than typically developing controls, which may be related to social and sensory processing difficulties. Therefore, lower gamma band power would indicate better functioning. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Event-Related Potentials (ERP) Components in Response to Standard Tones | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Auditory stimuli are presented and EEG events are assessed in relation to timing of the stimuli. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at week Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (end of each treatment period). The area under the curve was measured for different components of the ERP including P1 and P2 (positive components) and N1 and N2 (negative components). The average area under the curve was recorded for each component at each time point and change from baseline was calculated. Individuals with FXS are thought to have excessive ERP response, so a decrease in area under each curve compared to baseline would indicate a favorable outcome. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| Event-Related Potentials - Frontal Alpha Asymmetry at Resting State | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. EEG data was collected when the subject was in a resting state. Frontal alpha asymmetry measures differences in alpha activity level of the right and left hemisphere of the frontal lobe of the brain. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Mean alpha asymmetry at resting state was recorded and change from baseline was calculated for each time point. Higher alpha asymmetry scores indicate greater alpha power in the right hemisphere, which corresponds to increased neural activity of the left hemisphere. High activity of the left frontal lobe is hypothesized to correspond with approach behaviors, and high activity of the right frontal lobe is thought to correspond to withdrawal behaviors. In this study, higher alpha asymmetry scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| KiTAP Executive Battery - Alertness Subscore (Reaction Time) | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The alertness subtest requires subjects to tap a button every time a stimulus appears on the screen. Mean reaction time was measured over 90 seconds. A lower reaction time indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | milliseconds |
|
| KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest - Total Number of Correct Responses | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. A high mean number of correct responses and low mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Correct Responses |
|
| KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest - Total Number of Errors | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. A high mean number of correct responses and low mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Errors |
|
| KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest - Total Number of Correct Responses | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. A high mean number of correct responses and low mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Correct Responses |
|
| KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest - Total Number of Errors | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. A high mean number of correct responses and low mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Errors |
|
| KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest - Total Number of Correct Responses | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. A high mean number of correct responses and a low mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Correct Responses |
|
| KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest - Total Number of Errors | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. A high mean number of correct responses and a low mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | Errors |
|
| Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Overall Score | The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is a global measure to provide a clinical judgment of a participant's overall condition based on a trained clinician's assessment of cognition, behavior and activities of daily living. The clinician compares the subject with individuals of the same age and sex. The assessment of severity is with a 7-point scale: 1, not ill; 2, very mild; 3, mild; 4, moderate; 5, marked; 6, severe; 7, extremely severe. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Subscores | This assessment is a parent/caregiver-rated scale with six subscales to assess irritability, stereotypes, lethargy, hyperactivity, inappropriate speech, and social avoidance, using ABC-FX factoring system. The range of possible scores are irritability (0-54), lethargy (0-39), stereotypes (0-18), hyperactivity (0-30), inappropriate speech (0-12), and social avoidance (0-12). Mean score for each subscale was calculated. Lower scores on each subscale indicate fewer aberrant behaviors (better functioning). | Mean | Full Range | scores on a scale |
|
| Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS) Subscores | The ADAMS is a parent/caregiver rated scale with five sub-scores to assess manic/hyperactive behavior, depressed mood, social avoidance, general anxiety, and obsessive/compulsive behavior. The range of possible scores for each subscale is 0-21. Lower mean scores on each subscale indicate better functioning. | Mean | Full Range | scores on a scale |
|
| Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS-3) - Subdomain Growth Scale Values | VABS-3 is a clinician-administered standardized interview. For this study, we collected data in domains of communication (receptive & written language), daily living skills (domestic & community skills), & socialization (interpersonal relationships, play & leisure time, & coping abilities). Mean growth scale value (GSV) for each subdomain is reported. The possible GSVs for each subdomain are receptive (10-162), written (10-163), domestic (10-110), community (10-136), interpersonal (10-152), play and leisure (10-164), & coping skills (10-120). Higher GSVs indicate better functioning. | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale |
|
| NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery for Intellectual Disabilities (NIH-TCB) Total Cognition Score | The NIH-TCB is a battery of extensively validated computer-administered cognitive tests. The battery produces fluid and crystallized composite scores. The Total Cognition Composite Score is found by converting raw fluid and crystallized cognition scores to standard scores, averaging the these two scaled scores, then deriving standard scores based on this new distribution. Scores range from 0-140. The normative mean of the uncorrected score is 100 and the standard deviation is 15. A higher mean total cognition uncorrected composite score indicates better performance. | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale |
|
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Assessment Domain Scores | In an attempt to measure the level of behavioral difficulty experienced by the parent/caregiver with respect to the child with FXS, the VAS allows parents to mark on a visual line measuring 10 cm with one side marked "worst behavior" and the other side marked "best behavior." The caregiver rates the participant's behavior with respect to three domains: daily functioning, anxiety/irritability and language. Distances closer to 10 cm are considered worse behavior and distances closer to 0 cm are considered better behavior. | Mean | Full Range | score on a scale |
|
| Event-Related Potentials (ERP) - Gamma Band Absolute Power at Resting State (Frontal) | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Gamma 1 and gamma 2 waves were measured for various parts of the brain at a resting state. FXS patients have typically been found to exhibit greater gamma frequency band power than typically developing controls, which may be related to social and sensory processing difficulties. Therefore, lower gamma band power would indicate better functioning. | Mean | Standard Deviation | V^2/Hz |
|
| Event-Related Potential (ERP) Components in Response to Standard Tones | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Auditory stimuli are presented and EEG events are assessed in relation to timing of the stimuli. The area under the curve was measured for different components of the ERP including P1 and P2 (positive components) and N1 and N2 (negative components) and the average area was reported. | Mean | Standard Deviation | μV*seconds |
|
| Event-Related Potentials - Frontal Alpha Asymmetry at Resting State | ERP data was collected while the subject was in a resting state. Frontal alpha asymmetry measures differences in alpha activity level of the right and left hemisphere of the frontal lobe of the brain. Higher alpha asymmetry scores indicate greater alpha power in the right hemisphere, which corresponds to increased neural activity in the left hemisphere. High activity of the left frontal lobe is hypothesized to correspond with approach behaviors, and high activity of the right frontal lobe is thought to correspond to withdrawal behaviors. | Mean | Standard Deviation | unitless |
|
| OG001 | Ergoloid Mesylates (EM) and 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) | During treatment period 2, subjects will receive EM 1 mg (Medisca) and 5-HTP 100 mg (5-HTP, Basic Vitamins). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
| OG002 | 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) | During treatment period 3, subjects will receive 5-HTP 100 mg (5-HTP, Basic Vitamins) and matching placebo for EM 1 mg (ascorbic acid powder). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
| OG003 | Placebo | During treatment period 4, subjects will receive matching placebo for EM 1mg (ascorbic acid powder) and matching placebo for 5-Hydroxytryptophan 100mg (ascorbic acid powder). One of each capsule (both size 00) will be taken three times per day for four weeks. |
|
|
| Primary | Safety and Tolerability - Severity of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Adverse Events (AEs), including clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities and significant behavioral changes will be tabulated for each treatment period. The Investigator is responsible for assessing the severity (intensity) of each adverse event as mild, moderate, or severe according to the following definitions: Mild - An event that is easily tolerated and generally not interfering with normal daily activities. Moderate - An event that is sufficiently discomforting to interfere with normal daily activities. Severe - An event that is incapacitating with inability to work or perform normal daily activities. | The Safety population will include all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. | Posted | Number | Number of Adverse Events | Baseline through Week 17 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in KiTAP Executive Battery - Alertness Subscore (Reaction Time) | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The alertness subtest requires subjects to tap a button every time a stimulus appears on the screen. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean reaction time was measured over 90 seconds and change from baseline was calculated. A lower reaction time (net decrease in reaction time) indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | milliseconds | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which includes all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Correct Responses | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Distractibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The distractibility subtest measures how easily the subject is distracted by extraneous stimuli. This subtest requires subjects to tap a button when a target stimulus appears on the screen while ignoring distracters that appear shortly before the stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the distractability subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors over the 3 minutes indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which includes all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Errors | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Correct Responses | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Executive Battery Flexibility Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The flexibility subtest measures the subject's ability to be flexible about shifting from one response type to another. This subtest is 2 minutes long and requires subjects to alternate between identifying blue and green dragons which seem on random sides of the screen by tapping one of two buttons. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded and change from baseline was calculated. For the flexibility subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Errors | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Correct Responses on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | The primary efficacy population will be the intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Correct Responses | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Total Number of Errors on KiTAP Test of Attentional Performance Go-NoGo Subtest | The KiTAP is a computerized executive function battery that consists of eight nonverbal subtests measuring different basal as well as higher-order components of attention and executive functioning. The Go-NoGo subtest measures a subject's impulsivity by requiring subjects to tap a button when the target stimulus is presented, while refraining from hitting the button for the non-target stimulus. KiTAP was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). This subtest takes place over 2 minutes 30 seconds. Mean number of correct responses and errors were recorded, and change from baseline was calculated. For the Go-NoGo subtest, a higher mean number of correct responses and a lower mean number of errors indicates better performance. | The primary efficacy population will be the intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Errors | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale Overall Score | The Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) is a global measure to provide a clinical judgment of a participant's overall condition based on a trained clinician's assessment of cognition, behavior and activities of daily living. The clinician compares the subject with individuals of the same age and sex. The assessment of severity is with a 7-point scale: 1, not ill; 2, very mild; 3, mild; 4, moderate; 5, marked; 6, severe; 7, extremely severe. A net decrease in severity score over time indicates a positive outcome. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Subscores | This assessment is a parent/caregiver-rated scale with six subscales to assess irritability, stereotypes, lethargy, hyperactivity, inappropriate speech, and social avoidance, using ABC-FX factoring system. The ABC was was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean score for each subscale was measured and change from baseline was calculated. Lower mean scores on each subscale indicate fewer aberrant behaviors (better functioning).The range of possible scores on each subscale are irritability (0-54), lethargy (0-39), stereotypes (0-18), hyperactivity (0-30), inappropriate speech (0-12), and social avoidance (0-12). | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Anxiety, Depression, and Mood Scale (ADAMS) Subscores | The ADAMS is a parent/caregiver rated scale with five subscores to assess manic/hyperactive behavior, depressed mood, social avoidance, general anxiety, and obsessive/compulsive behavior. The ADAMs was completed at Baseline as well as Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (the end of each treatment period). Mean score for each subscale was recorded, and change from baseline was calculated for each subscore. The range of possible scores for each subscale is 0-21. Lower mean scores on each subscale indicate better functioning. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Scale - Subdomain Growth Scale Values | VABS-3 is a clinician-administered standardized interview. For this study, we collected data in domains of communication (receptive & written language), daily living skills (domestic & community skills), & socialization (interpersonal relationships, play & leisure time, & coping abilities). This assessment was administered at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Mean growth scale value (GSV) for each subdomain was recorded at each time point and change from baseline was calculated. The possible GSVs for each subdomain are receptive (10-162), written (10-163), domestic (10-110), community (10-136), interpersonal (10-152), play and leisure (10-164), & coping skills (10-120). Higher GSVs for each subdomain indicate better functioning. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery for Intellectual Disabilities (NIH-TCB) Total Cognition Score | The NIH-TCB is a battery of extensively validated computer-administered cognitive tests. The NIH-TCB includes 7 evaluations measuring cognitive flexibility, inhibition & visual attention, episodic memory, immediate recall & sequencing of different visually & orally presented stimuli, processing speed, recognition of letters and words, & receptive vocabulary. This assessment was administered at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). This battery produces fluid and crystallized cognition composite scores. The Total Cognition Composite Score is found by converting raw fluid and crystallized scores to standard scores, averaging these two scores, then deriving standard scores based on this new distribution. Scores range from 0-140. The normative mean of the uncorrected standard score is 100 and the standard deviation is 15. A higher mean total cognition composite score indicates better performance. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which includes all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Assessment Domain Scores | IIn an attempt to measure the level of behavioral difficulty experienced by the parent/caregiver with respect to the child with FXS, the VAS allows parents to mark on a visual line measuring 10 cm with one side marked "worst behavior" and the other side marked "best behavior." The caregiver rated the participant's behavior with respect to three domains: daily functioning, anxiety/irritability and language. Distances closer to 10 cm are considered worse behavior and distances closer to 0 cm are considered better behavior. Average distance of the mark was recorded for each domain at Baseline then again at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Change from baseline was calculated for each domain. Lower scores indicate a better outcome (closer distance to best behavior side). | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Event-Related Potentials (ERP) - Gamma Band Absolute Power at Resting State (Frontal) | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Gamma 1 and gamma 2 waves were measured for various parts of the brain at a resting state. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (at the end of each treatment period). Mean power of gamma 1 and gamma 2 bands, measured by frontal EEG leads, was recorded for each time point and change from baseline was calculated. FXS patients have typically been found to exhibit greater gamma frequency band power than typically developing controls, which may be related to social and sensory processing difficulties. Therefore, lower gamma band power would indicate better functioning. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | V^2/Hz | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Event-Related Potentials (ERP) Components in Response to Standard Tones | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. Auditory stimuli are presented and EEG events are assessed in relation to timing of the stimuli. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at week Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (end of each treatment period). The area under the curve was measured for different components of the ERP including P1 and P2 (positive components) and N1 and N2 (negative components). The average area under the curve was recorded for each component at each time point and change from baseline was calculated. Individuals with FXS are thought to have excessive ERP response, so a decrease in area under each curve compared to baseline would indicate a favorable outcome. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | μV*seconds | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Event-Related Potentials - Frontal Alpha Asymmetry at Resting State | Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) enable extraction of neural responses associated with specific sensory, cognitive, or motor events from an overall EEG. EEG data was collected when the subject was in a resting state. Frontal alpha asymmetry measures differences in alpha activity level of the right and left hemisphere of the frontal lobe of the brain. ERP was performed at Baseline as well as at Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16 (end of each treatment period). Mean alpha asymmetry at resting state was recorded and change from baseline was calculated for each time point. Higher alpha asymmetry scores indicate greater alpha power in the right hemisphere, which corresponds to increased neural activity of the left hemisphere. High activity of the left frontal lobe is hypothesized to correspond with approach behaviors, and high activity of the right frontal lobe is thought to correspond to withdrawal behaviors. In this study, higher alpha asymmetry scores indicate a better outcome. | Intent to treat (ITT) efficacy population, which will include all participants who received at least one dose of treatment and returned for at least one follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | unitless | Baseline, Week 4 (EM Treatment), Week 8 (EM+5-HTP Treatment), Week 12 (5-HTP Treatment), Week 16 (Placebo Treatment) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 1 |
| 15 |
| EG001 | Placebo | 2 placebo capsules three times daily for 4 weeks Placebo: Placebo capsules | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 15 |
| EG002 | Ergoloid Mesylates (EM) and Placebo | Ergoloid mesylates (EM) 1 mg three times daily and 1 placebo capsule three times daily for 4 weeks. Ergoloid Mesylate: Ergoloid Mesylates, trade name Hydergine, is a mixture of the methanesulfonate salts of three dihydrogenated ergot alkaloids, dihydroergocristine, dihydroergocornine, and alpha- and beta-dihydroergocryptine. Ergot alkaloids are dopamine agonists which activate dopamine receptors (in the basal ganglia and other parts of the brain involved in motor function) and a prolactin inhibitor. Ergot is a strong vasoconstrictor and thus helps to reduce bleeding by narrowing of the blood vessels. Placebo: Placebo capsules | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 15 |
| EG003 | 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and Placebo | 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) 100 mg three times daily and 1 placebo capsule three times daily for 4 weeks. 5-Hydroxytryptophan / Vitamin B6: 5-hydroxytryptophan, also known as 5-HTP has a nutraceutical status and has never been approved as a drug for any indication, but as a dietary supplement has been used extensively for several disorders for many years such as in the therapy of depression, fibromyalgia, obesity, insomnia and chronic headache Placebo: Placebo capsules | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper Respiratory Infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D025064 | Sex Chromosome Disorders |
| D025063 | Chromosome Disorders |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D040181 | Genetic Diseases, X-Linked |
| D020271 | Heredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System |
| D000602 |
| Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D004088 | Dihydroergotoxine |
| D004879 | Ergotamines |
| D004876 | Ergot Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D006576 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| Moderate |
|
| Severe |
|
| Lethargy Subscale |
|
| Stereotypes Subscale |
|
| Hyperactivity Subscale |
|
| Inappropriate Speech Subscale |
|
| Social Avoidance Subscale |
|
| Depressed Mood Total Score |
|
| Social Avoidance Total Score |
|
| General Anxiety Total Score |
|
| Obsessive/Compulsive Behavior Total Score |
|
| Written Communication Subdomain |
|
| Daily Living Skills - Community Subdomain |
|
| Daily Living Skills - Domestic Subdomain |
|
| Social - Interpersonal Relationships Subdomain |
|
| Social - Play and Leisure Subdomain |
|
| Social - Coping Skills Subdomain |
|
| Daily Function Issues |
|
| Anxiety or Irritability Issues |
|
| Gamma 2 (65-80 Hz) Absolute Power |
|
| P2 Component |
|
| N1 Component |
|
| N2 Component |
|