Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
this trial is to test the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
To evaluate the clinical performance of a novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) compared to the conventional universal adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive) in geriatric patients with Non-carious Cervical lesions (NCLLs)
P: Population: Geriatric patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) I: Intervention: Novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) C: Comparator : 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive O: Outcome:Clinical Performance using FDI criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yamakin TMR-Aquabond0 | Experimental | Novel Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) |
|
| 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive | Active Comparator | Conventional Universal Adhesive |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonding in NCCLs | Other | bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of fractured restorations | First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure there is no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria ( first visually for total loss followed by tactile inspection using FDI probe for any fracture /rocking or loss of retention. | 12 months |
| Number of restorations with retention loss | First, visual inspection to ensure that there is no complete loss of retention of the restoration then tactile evaluation will be done using probe tip that will be held gently at right angle to the labial surface and move from restoration to tooth and vice versa to insure no rocking /fracture /ditching in the restoration following FDI criteria | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of restoration with change in colour or texture | Evaluation will be done visually following FDI criteria to ensure no change in colour or texture of the restoration | 12 months |
| Number of restoration caused biological harm |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry , Cairo University | Cairo | 02022 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29935766 | Result | Li Y, Hu X, Xia Y, Ji Y, Ruan J, Weir MD, Lin X, Nie Z, Gu N, Masri R, Chang X, Xu HHK. Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1310-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 21. | |
| 32486393 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Aug 28, 2023 | |
| Reset | Mar 14, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation will be done following FDI criteria using FDI probe to ensure there is no change in restoration that caused any harm to the health of biological structure
| 12 months |
| Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Majsterek I. The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950. |
| 27778115 | Result | Santis LR, Silva TM, Haddad BA, Goncalves LL, Goncalves SE. Influence of dentin thickness on intrapulpal temperature under simulated pulpal pressure during Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2098-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24. |
| 32031090 | Result | Akarsu S, Karademir SA, Ertas E, Atasoy S. The effect of diode laser application on restoration of non carious cervical lesion: Clinical follow up. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-171. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_399_19. |
| 31994534 | Result | Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16-42. |
| 24814138 | Result | Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 6. |
| 33551590 | Result | Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, Vijayalakshmi L, Murthy CS. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):227-232. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4. |
| 20847997 | Result | Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262. |
| 28962842 | Result | Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27. |
| 22632386 | Result | Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5542-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307491. |
| 26774320 | Result | Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Lemons JE, Kinderknecht KE, Givan DA, Ramp L. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 May;115(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021. Epub 2016 Jan 7. |
| 32933775 | Result | de Paris Matos T, Perdigao J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020 Nov;36(11):1474-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12. |
| 25139815 | Result | Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 16. |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2023 | Mar 14, 2024 |