Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2021-08583 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2021-0101 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
0 participants accrued
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study better understands the views on shared decision-making among Chinese adults who smoke or who have a spouse who smokes. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer among men and women in the United States and is the number one cause of cancer-related mortality among Asians and Pacific Islanders. Clinicians are recommended to initiate conversations about lung cancer screening with eligible patients, provide information about the benefits and harms, and engage in shared decision-making. However, a patient's cultural background can influence decision-making in many ways. Given this, there is a need to understand the perceptions of shared decision-making among different populations (in this case, Asian populations) in order to inform the design of culturally sensitive decision aids for cancer screening. This study evaluates how Chinese populations in the U.S. who currently smoke or who have partners who smoke perceive the process of shared decision-making, their preferences, the perceived barriers and facilitators, and their perspective on currently-available screening tools.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Understand how Chinese populations in the Unites States who currently smoke or who have partners who smoke perceive the process of shared health-related decision-making and their preferences in terms of role involvement, and the barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making.
II. Evaluate current publicly available lung cancer screening tools from the perspective of Chinese adults who smoke or who have partners who smoke.
OUTLINE:
Participants attend an interview over 45-60 minutes and/or a focus group over 1.5 to 2 hours.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observational (interview, discussion) | Participants attend an interview over 45-60 minutes and/or a focus group over 1.5 to 2 hours. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion | Procedure | Attend a focus group |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| How Chinese populations who smoke or have partners who smoke perceive the process of shared health-related decision-making | Data analysis and data collection occurs simultaneously. Data is analyzed using a sequential approach to identify major and minor thematic areas. An initial codebook is developed based on the core questions within the interview guide, the literature, and initial coding of 3-4 transcripts. The internal validity of the codebook is established through detailed discussion between the coders and the research team. The reliability of the codebook is established in the first level of coding (descriptive codes) by double coding 25% of interviews and discussing any discrepancies to reach consensus on codes. Researchers analyze codes to identify the major and minor themes. Findings are summarized and illustrated using verbatim exemplars. | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Chinese populations' preferences in terms of role involvement, and the barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making | Data analysis and data collection occurs simultaneously. Data is analyzed using a sequential approach to identify major and minor thematic areas. An initial codebook is developed based on the core questions within the interview guide, the literature, and initial coding of 3-4 transcripts. The internal validity of the codebook is established through detailed discussion between the coders and the research team. The reliability of the codebook is established in the first level of coding (descriptive codes) by double coding 25% of interviews and discussing any discrepancies to reach consensus on codes. Researchers analyze codes to identify the major and minor themes. Findings are summarized and illustrated using verbatim exemplars. | through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Current publicly available lung cancer screening tools from the perspective of Chinese adults who smoke or who have partners who smoke | Data analysis and data collection occur simultaneously. Data is analyzed using thematic analysis. Based on the data from one focus group, an initial codebook is developed based on themes raised by participants. The data is grouped according to broad categories based on the aspects of the tool that the participants provided feedback on, such as: (1) visuals, (2) format of the tool, (3) information, (4) preferences in how risk is presented, (5) decision support, and (6) recommendations for improvement. The codebook is adjusted and refined to include codes that are identified from additional transcripts. Two coders code the transcripts after establishing the codebook's internal validity and reliability through consultation and assistance from other research team members. Findings are summarized and illustrated with verbatim quotes of participants. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are recruited through several sources, including: (1) MD Anderson Cancer Center's (MDACC) Shared Decision Making Core Facility's registry ("REACH" Registry) of patients and caregivers who are willing to participate in decision support development studies (2) community health clinics serving Asian populations in Houston (3) Chinese religious or community groups/centers or at commercial locations catering to the Chinese community (4) social media or virtual groups that cater to Chinese communities of all ages or (5) snowball sampling through referrals from other participants.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Robert J Volk | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | View source |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007407 | Interviews as Topic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Interview | Other | Attend interview |
|
| through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |