Effectiveness of Recruitment Maneuvers and Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS
Effectiveness of Recruitment Maneuvers and Lung Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS
The study was designed to comparison the effectiveness of recruitment maneuvers(RM) and lung protective ventilation strategy(LPVS) for patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
ARDS patients were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group (LPVS+RM group) and the control group (LPVS group). The method of RM refers to that under FiO2=100% oxygen concentration and fixed inspiratory pressure (15cmH2O), the PEEP starts from 10 cmH2O and increases at a pressure of 5 cmH2O every minute until the Peak inspiratory Pressure(PIP) reaches 55cmH2O, and the arterial blood oxygen is monitored at the same time. The pressure point when the partial pressure of arterial oxygen PaO2+PaCO2≧400mmHg is the best PEEP. The primary endpoint indicators were oxygenation index(OI) and lung ultrasound score(LUS) from day 1 to day 7. The secondary outcome indicators were the ventilator days, length of stay in the ICU (days), and ICU mortality.
ARDS patients were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group (LPVS+RM group) and the control group (LPVS group). The method of RM refers to that under FiO2=100% oxygen concentration and fixed inspiratory pressure (15cmH2O), the PEEP starts from 10 cmH2O and increases at a pressure of 5 cmH2O every minute until the Peak inspiratory Pressure(PIP) reaches 55cmH2O, and the arterial blood oxygen is monitored at the same time. The pressure point when the partial pressure of arterial oxygen PaO2+PaCO2≧400mmHg is the best PEEP. The primary endpoint indicators were oxygenation index(OI) and lung ultrasound score(LUS) from day 1 to day 7. The secondary outcome indicators were the ventilator days, length of stay in the ICU (days), and ICU mortality.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
kuan.zitin@gmail.com886-966083885