Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary objective of this study is to compare fracture related infection (FRI) rates of ZNN Bactiguard Tibia to conventional uncoated titanium-alloy nails 12 months after tibia fracture fixation.
The secondary objectives are confirmation of safety, performance and clinical benefits of ZNN Bactiguard implant and related instrumentation12 months after fracture fixation.
This is a multicenter, prospective, Post-market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study with retrospective controls.
The study will enroll patients that will be implanted with the Zimmer Natural Nail Bactiguard Tibia device and retrospective controls implanted with standard titanium-alloy tibia nails.
500 tibias will be recruited at maximum 15 sites and allocated on a 1:1 ratio into an:
The primary endpoint is the Fracture Related Infection (FRI) rate in the study population 12 months after fracture fixation.
The secondary endpoint is the confirmation of safety, performance and clinical benefits of ZNN Bactiguard implant and related instrumentation through the following measure systems:
Data will be collected at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after fracture fixation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational group | Subjects that will be implanted with the ZNN Bactiguard tibia device. |
| |
| Control group | Subjects that have received an uncoated titanium-alloy tibia nail in the past (data collection is retrospective; patients will not have to undergo any study-related procedure). |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZNN Bactiguard tibia | Device | Tibia fracture fixation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture related infection (FRI) rate in investigational and control group | FRI diagnosed according to the updated diagnostic algorithm drafted by the Fracture-Related Infection Consensus Group (Definition and diagnosis of fracture-related infection, M McNally,G Govaert, M Dudareva, M Morgenstern, W J Metsemakers, EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:614-619.) | 12 months after fracture fixation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tibia fracture healing assessed radiologically through Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score | The RUST score assigns each tibial cortex (anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) a score from 1 to 3, based on the appearance on the X-ray. The scores of all cortices combined will give a minimum score of 4 (definitely not healed) up to a maximum of 12 (completely healed). | 12 months after fracture fixation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient must be 18 or older.
Patient has signed IRB/EC-approved informed consent (if applicable for retrospective controls, based on local requirements).
Patient suffered primary tibia fracture (monolateral or bilateral) at high risk of infection, eligible for fixation by intramedullary (IM) nailing (standard or suprapatellar approach) and meets at least one of the following conditions:
Patient:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient is unwilling or unable to give consent.
Patient is not expected to survive follow-up schedule.
Patient is anticipated to be non-compliant to the study protocol.
Patient has a mental or neurological condition or alcohol/drug addiction that will not allow for proper informed consent and/or participation in follow-up program.
Patient is a prisoner.
Patient is known to be pregnant and/or breastfeeding.
Patient suffered tibia fracture that meets any of the following conditions:
For control group:
patient doesn't have all the minimum required data available:
Tibia medullary canal is obliterated by a previous fracture or tumor*
Tibia bone shaft having excessive bow or a deformity*
Lack of bone substance or bone quality, which makes stable seating of the nail implant impossible*
All concomitant diseases that can impair the operation, functioning or the success of the nail implant*
Insufficient blood circulation*
Skeletally immature patients*
Infection*
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
18-year-old patients or older with tibia fractures at high risk for infection (as defined in the inclusion criteria) treated with a titanium-alloy intramedullary nail.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma de Ramon Francas | Contact | +41 79 377 11 96 | gemma.deramonfrancas@zimmerbiomet.com | |
| Lisa To | Contact | +32 2 456 12 70 | Lisa.To@zimmerbiomet.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Emilie Rohmer | Clin Ops Director | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tirolkliniken Innsbruck | Recruiting | Innsbruck | 6020 | Austria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tibia fracture healing assessed clinically through the Function IndeX for Trauma (FIX-IT) score | The FIX-IT score assesses the subject's pain and ability to bear weight on lower extremity fractures. It ranges from 0 to 12 points, with 12 points representing the highest level of limb function. | 12 months after fracture fixation |
| Limb functionality measured through the Oxford Knee Score | The Oxford Knee Score consists of twelve questions regarding knee functionality and pain. The score ranges from 12 to 60 points, with 12 points indicating the best outcome. | 12 months after fracture fixation |
| Quality of life of study participants assessed through the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | The EQ-5D is a self-reported descriptive questionnaire about the patient's quality of life composed of 5 questions referring to mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain and anxiety/depression. Each question has 3 possible answers, which define the level of perceived problems (none, moderate,extreme problem) | 12 months after fracture fixation |
| Incidence and frequency of adverse events | Frequency and incidence of recorded AEs will be calculated | 12 months after fracture fixation |
| Hôpital Ambroise-Paré | Recruiting | Boulogne-Billancourt | 92100 | France |
|
| Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille Nord | Recruiting | Marseille | 13915 | France |
|
| Universitätsklinikum Marburg | Recruiting | Marburg | Hesse | 35039 | Germany |
|
| Universitätsklinikum Leipzig | Recruiting | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
|
| Universitätsklinikum Regensburg | Recruiting | Regensburg | 93053 | Germany |
|
| AOU Policlinico di Bari | Recruiting | Bari | 70124 | Italy |
|
| Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi | Recruiting | Florence | 50134 | Italy |
|
| Tygerberg Hospital | Recruiting | Cape Town | 7505 | South Africa |
|
| Groote Schuur Hospital | Recruiting | Cape Town | 7935 | South Africa |
|
| Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebrón | Recruiting | Barcelona | Catalonia | 08035 | Spain |
|
| Kantonsspital Winterthur | Recruiting | Winterthur | Canton of Zurich | 8400 | Switzerland |
|
| Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh | Recruiting | Edinburgh | EH16 4SA | United Kingdom |
|
| Leeds General Infirmary | Recruiting | Leeds | LS1 3EX | United Kingdom |
|
| The Royal London Hospital | Recruiting | London | E1 1FR | United Kingdom |
|
| King's College Hospital NHS Trust | Recruiting | London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013978 | Tibial Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided