Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Oral fluid based HIV Self-testing (HIVST) provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.
This study involves around 900 persons who are non-healthcare professionals and inexperienced in HIV self-testing (intended users) and are presenting at clinic sites across Canada for HIV testing. It will evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.
A final report of study results will be provided to the Test manufacturer for inclusion in the Health Canada license application process.
Background and Rationale:
Self-testing for HIV is an approach with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing for those who may not otherwise test and remain undiagnosed. There is increasing evidence showing the acceptability and usability of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in various key populations. In 2016 the World Health Organization recommended HIVST as an alternative option to complement existing HIV testing opportunities. Since then, HIVST use has been scaling up rapidly; for example, Canada's first blood-based (fingerstick) HIV self-test was licensed for use in November 2020.
Oral fluid based HIVST provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.
Having a licensed oral fluid HIV self-test in addition to the licensed blood-based HIV self-test will allow individuals to choose what is best for them and increase the potential to reach the undiagnosed living with HIV.
Objective:
This study will evaluate the accuracy, usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.
Hypothesis:
The OraQuick Self-test as performed by intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will meet or exceed the accuracy, usability and label comprehension requirements from Health Canada for license as a Class IV in vitro diagnostic device for Canadian market entry.
Study Design:
This study was designed around the requirements set out in the Health Canada Guidance Document: "Guidance for Manufacturers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT's) for Use at Point of Care or Self Testing, 2017". It is an investigational device trial designed as a cross-sectional study which employs observational and interview-based methods.
Sample population:
The study population requirements published by Health Canada stipulates that the prospective study include: 900 lay persons with unknown HIV status including 400 persons at risk for HIV infection (e.g. intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men, etc.). Self-reported practices or behaviour will be used to define those at high risk.
A minimum of 900 participants (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will read the instructions for use and conduct the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test. They will not be provided any training prior to use of the test. A trained healthcare provider or researcher (trained Observer) will watch, and document use of the test and independently read the participants self-test result. The participants will then complete a questionnaire to share their opinion on usability and label comprehension of this test.
A minimum of 400 (of the 900) participants will also be provided five mock devices with different results and asked to interpret those results i.e. strong positive; weak positive, negative, invalid with no control and no test line, and invalid with no control and a positive test line. This will evaluate readability of this test.
All participants will also have a venous blood sample collected for testing of plasma at a central laboratory with a 4th generation (Ag/Ab combo) HIV enzyme immunoassay that will serve as the comparator method (laboratory reference testing). All self-tests will be confirmed using a Canadian standard HIV testing algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-test result will be calculated relative to the "clinical truth" of the participants' HIV status determined by the confirmatory test process, where applicable. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit, two (2) weeks after self-testing to obtain their laboratory test results which will be their official result.
Study Intervention Details:
Participants will be recruited to the study when they come in for voluntary HIV testing (e.g. POC testing) at a minimum of 3 study sites (different geographic locations). If persons consent to participating, all those enrolled will voluntarily complete a questionnaire (collecting demographics and HIV medical history information) and then provide their venous whole blood sample (for standard of care, laboratory confirmatory testing and comparator method), complete the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test (read test instructions, sample collection, sample testing, result interpretation), complete mock result interpretation, and complete questionnaires - Visit 1 (day 1; about 60 minutes). All patients will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit two (2) weeks later to obtain their laboratory test results (Visit 2; about 15 - 60 minutes), post -test counselling, and to be linked to appropriate care depending on the test results..
Patients may also have a point-of-care (POC) test conducted on site as part of the clinic's standard of care testing, outside of the protocol and after all study procedures for Visit 1 are completed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investigational Device | Experimental | Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OraQuick® HIV Self-Test | Device | OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement | Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary. | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
| Observer Usability Assessment | Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
| Participant and Observer Interpretations | Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results. | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
| Label Comprehension | To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result. | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices) | The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results. | Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sean B Rourke, PhD | MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Micheal's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cool Aid Community Health Centre | Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada | |||
| Nine Circles Community Health Centre |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Investigational Device | Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test OraQuick® HIV Self-Test: OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Self-testing participants with unknown HIV status
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Investigational Device | Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test OraQuick® HIV Self-Test: OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement | Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary. | The invalids, inconclusive and not sure/do not know were not included in the calculations of Positive and Negative % Agreement. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
|
|
Adverse event data were collected over the two week time frame in which the participant completed visit 1 and visit 2.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Self-testing Participants | Unknown HIV status | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffer solution-soaked swab placed in mouth | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment | While conducting an HIV self-test in the OraQuick HIV Self-Test study, Participant placed the device swab into the test buffer solution before placing the buffer-soaked device into his/her mouth which is a procedure fault condition. |
This is a prospective study for which the prevalence of infection is low.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sean B. Rourke | Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital | (416) 878-2779 | sean.rourke@utoronto.ca |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 13, 2021 | Feb 14, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
Not provided
Not provided
Cross-sectional, prospective, field trial (untrained self-tester)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Winnipeg |
| Manitoba |
| Canada |
| ByWard Family Health Team | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada |
| Hassle Free Clinic | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Maple Leaf Research | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Women's Health in Women's Hands Community Health Centre | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Clinique médicale l'Actuel | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Education | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Employment | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| HIV Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Medical Condition | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Reading/Writing Impairment | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Self-Reported HIV Risk | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sexual Orientation | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Tested for HIV Before | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Visual Impairment | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Observer Usability Assessment | Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly | Totals for each category varied based on participant responses | Posted | Count of Units | Expected Responses | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. | Expected Responses | Expected Responses |
|
|
|
| Primary | Participant and Observer Interpretations | Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Label Comprehension | To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result. | The numbers are based on survey responses which varied across the different survey questions. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices) | The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results. | Posted | Count of Units | In Concordance | Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant. | In Concordance | In Concordance |
|
|
|
| 951 |
| 0 |
| 951 |
| 3 |
| 951 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| Unexpected response |
|
| Was the IFU referred to during the test process? |
|
| Did the study participant remove the contents of the test pack? |
|
| Was the study participant able to find the test tube packet? |
|
| Did the study participant remove the test tube from the packet? |
|
| Did the study participant remove the cap from the test tube? |
|
| Did the study participant place the test tube in the holder? |
|
| Did the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube? |
|
| Was the study participant able to find the test stick packet? |
|
| Did the study participant remove the test stick from the packet? |
|
| Did the study participant touch the flat pad? |
|
| Did the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)? |
|
| Did the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly? |
|
| Did the participant perform any steps out of the order? |
|
| Did the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step? |
|
| Did the participant quit the process at any point? |
|
| Did the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test? |
|
| Were the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow? |
|
|
| Were the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful? |
|
|
| Was the Self-Test easy to use? |
|
|
| Are you confident you could perform this test on your own? |
|
|
| Would you use this test again if it were available to you? |
|
|
| Would you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)? |
|
|
| Would you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend) |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Invalid, test line present |
|
| Invalid, no control line or test line |
|