Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Center of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purposes of this study include:
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disabilities in the U.S., which can markedly impact the function of the upper extremity (UE). One of the major UE motor impairments is abnormal intermuscular coordination, which leads to impaired post-stroke function and life participation. Also, relatively little is understood about how stroke affects the corticospinal innervation of multiple UE muscles, visualized as multi-muscle motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1), and its association with intermuscular coordination and impaired UE motor function in stroke. Some studies have shown that improvement in corticospinal excitability for the affected limb may be able to improve intermuscular coordination and enhance motor function recovery after stroke. Operant conditioning is a method that can be used to produce not only targeted plasticity but also wider beneficial plasticity in multiple spinal/supraspinal pathways. Recent studies have shown that MEP operant up-conditioning can increase the corticospinal excitability for the targeted muscle in people with SCI in the UE and lower extremity (LE) and in the LE of multiple sclerosis.
For the aim 1 of the project, MEPs elicited by TMS will be applied at the hot spot for the wrist ECR. EMG signal from 15 UE muscle will be collected simultaneously during isometric force generation tasks. This aim will enroll 10 age-matched (age of 40-75 yo) healthy adult and 10 adult (age of 40-75 yo) stroke survivors. Each participant will have a single measurement session.
For the aim 2 of the project, 4 randomized out of 10 stroke survivors will perform operant conditioning method of the wrist ECR; also, assessment of the intermuscular coordination, UE Fugl-Meyer (FM), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) will be performed. Participants will have three visits per week for 10 weeks for training session. Finally, to test retention of the intervention effect, they will perform two assessment sessions one and three months after finishing the training.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ECR MEP conditioning - Stroke | Experimental | MEP operant conditioning of ECR in stroke survivors |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operant conditioning of motor evoked potentials | Other | MEPs elicited by TMS will be applied at the hot spot for the wrist extensor carpi radialis. During training trials, participants will be asked to increase the size of their MEP response. During assessment trials, a physical therapist or occupational therapist will rate the functional level of arm impairment using FMA and ARAT. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in intermuscular coordination patterns (ICoPs) | EMGs will be recorded from 15 muscles. To assess whether wrist extensor MEP OC induces changes in the composition of intermuscular coordination patterns, non-negative matrix factorization will be applied to EMGs to identify and compare ICoPs. | before any training, after the 12th and 24th conditioning sessions, respectively, and 1 and 3 months after the 24th conditioning, respectively |
| Change in motor evoked potential (MEP) | To measure the amount of the corticospinal excitability of the target muscle (extensor carpi radialis) and its antagonist (flexor carpi radialis), MEPs will be elicited while the participant provides ~30% maximum voluntary contraction level of each muscle background electromyographic (EMG) signals. For all trials, transcranial magnetic stimulation at ~10% above active motor threshold at the optimum location of the cortex will be used to elicit the MEP. | before any training, after the 12th and 24th conditioning sessions, respectively, and 1 and 3 months after the 24th conditioning, respectively |
| Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score | To measure severity of motor impairment after stroke, FMA will be performed in the human upper extremity. FMA is commonly used to assess severity of motor impairment and motor recovery. The maximum FMA upper extremity motor score is 66 (i.e., 0: complete motor impairment; 66: normal motor performance). Each item is scored on a 3-point scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, 2 = performs fully). | Time Frame: before any training, after the 12th and 24th conditioning sessions, respectively, and 1 and 3 months after the 24th conditioning, respectively |
| Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score | To measure motor function after stroke, ARAT will be performed in the human upper extremity. 19 Items comprising the ARAT are categorized into four subscales (grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement) and arranged in order of decreasing difficulty, with the most difficult task examined first, followed by the least difficult task. Task performance is rated on a 4-point scale, ranging from 0 (no movement) to 3 (movement performed normally). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in force errors that occur during isometric wrist force tracking tasks | As a mechanistic outcome, force errors that occur during isometric wrist force tracking tasks (ramp up-hold-ramp down) will be recorded to assess wrist motor control function that can change as corticospinal excitability increases through MEP up-conditioning. | before any training, after the 12th and 24th conditioning sessions, respectively, and 1 and 3 months after the 24th conditioning, respectively |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria for aged matched healthy group
Exclusion criteria for aged matched healthy group
Inclusion criteria for stroke group
Exclusion criteria for stroke group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jinsook Roh, PhD | Contact | 7137432578 | jroh@Central.UH.EDU | |
| Manuel A Portilla-Jiménez, MS, BME | Contact | 3467194921 | maporti4@cougarnet.uh.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jinsook Roh, Ph.D. | University of Houston | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Houston | Recruiting | Houston | Texas | 77204 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25856485 | Background | Ting LH, Chiel HJ, Trumbower RD, Allen JL, McKay JL, Hackney ME, Kesar TM. Neuromechanical principles underlying movement modularity and their implications for rehabilitation. Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(1):38-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.042. | |
| 25762917 | Background | McMorland AJ, Runnalls KD, Byblow WD. A neuroanatomical framework for upper limb synergies after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 16;9:82. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00082. eCollection 2015. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| before any training, after the 12th and 24th conditioning sessions, respectively, and 1 and 3 months after the 24th conditioning, respectively |
| 19828310 | Background | Tresch MC, Jarc A. The case for and against muscle synergies. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Dec;19(6):601-7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 12. |
| 23155178 | Background | Roh J, Rymer WZ, Perreault EJ, Yoo SB, Beer RF. Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(3):768-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.00670.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 14. |
| 25717296 | Background | Roh J, Rymer WZ, Beer RF. Evidence for altered upper extremity muscle synergies in chronic stroke survivors with mild and moderate impairment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 11;9:6. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00006. eCollection 2015. |
| 30625010 | Background | Thompson AK, Fiorenza G, Smyth L, Favale B, Brangaccio J, Sniffen J. Operant conditioning of the motor-evoked potential and locomotion in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Mar 1;121(3):853-866. doi: 10.1152/jn.00557.2018. Epub 2019 Jan 9. |
| 30207863 | Background | Thompson AK, Cote RH, Sniffen JM, Brangaccio JA. Operant conditioning of the tibialis anterior motor evoked potential in people with and without chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec 1;120(6):2745-2760. doi: 10.1152/jn.00362.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 12. |
| 30123249 | Background | Thompson AK, Favale BM, Velez J, Falivena P. Operant Up-Conditioning of the Tibialis Anterior Motor-Evoked Potential in Multiple Sclerosis: Feasibility Case Studies. Neural Plast. 2018 Jul 15;2018:4725393. doi: 10.1155/2018/4725393. eCollection 2018. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |