Minimal Invasive Volar Plating Versus Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Stable Non-displaced Distal Radial Fractures.
Minimal Invasive Volar Plating Versus Cast Immobilization for Treatment of Stable Non-displaced Distal Radial Fractures.
Nondisplaced distal radial fractures are nowadays treated by plaster cast immobilization. In this study, the investigators challenge this classical standard treatment with a surgical solution: minimal invasive volar plating with pronatus quadratus sparing approach. Potential benefits of this surgical treatment are higher cost effectiveness, economical benefit, earlier recuperation of professional and recreational activities, earlier functional recuperation by faster clinical recovery (range of motion, grip strength) and decreased risk of secondary fracture displacement. Potential drawbacks are surgical risks and complications.
Randomized controlled trial Number still to be determined by power analysis on economical outcome measurement Similar study number = 90 Randomization by computer.
RZ Tienen, Dr Goorens Level 4 hand surgeon
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Treatment
Followup 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
Primary PROM:
Cost effectiveness: QALY SF-36
Direct costs: surgery, hospitalisation, follow-up consultations, imaging, medication, wound care, nurse cost, physiotherapy cost
Indirect costs: loss of productivity (SF-HLQ)
Health insurances costs
Confounding factors
Work absence, professional recuperation
Recreational sport resumption
Secondary PROM
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
cgoorens@msn.com0032478907124