Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Healsea® chronic is CE marked medical device indicated in adults for the treatment of nasal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is an hypertonic seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.2%) isolated from marine bacteria. In vitro, Symbiofilm® inhibits at early stage biofilm formation from bacteria found to be more prevalent and abundant in CRS patients (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa). This exploratory study is designed with aim to determine if the antibiofilm properties of Symbiofilm® may modify sino-nasal microbiota, impacting α and/ or β diversities.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses and is characterized by two or more symptoms, one of which should be either nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior nasal drip), lasting for 12 weeks or longer. In addition, facial pain or pressure and a reduction in the sense of smell can occur. The condition can occur with or without nasal polyps.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a significant health problem and affects 5-12% of the general population.
The physiopathology of CRS is poorly understood with multiple environmental, host and microbial factors being implicated. Putative pathological factors include changes in the microbiota, imbalance of the local or systemic immune system, allergens, toxins and genetic predisposition.
A dysbiosis mechanism has been proposed as modulating inflammation in diseased sinuses. This hypothesis suggests that externally influenced changes in the nasal microbiome can result in dysbiosis, i.e. a shift from a "normal" or "healthy" microbial community structure and that this shift may be responsible for the initiation or maintenance of CRS. For example, the disruption of the commensal biofilm during a viral upper respiratory tract infection can create a niche for pathogenic species to grow. Despite many contradictory statements in the different studies some common trends emerge. Less diversity in the microbial community rather than an increased overall bacterial load seems to characterize CRS compared to the healthy state with no consensus about specific genera indicative of disease. However, anaerobes and S. aureus are found to be significantly more prevalent and abundant in CRS versus healthy controls. Bacterial biofilm is detected on the sinus mucosa in up to 80% of CRS patients and its presence does not imply that it is causing mucosal inflammation. However, in the context of CRS, there are several possible mechanisms by which biofilms may be pro-inflammatory including the release of planktonic organisms and the release of superantigens, which can cause ciliary dysfunction and inhibition of ciliary clearance. Bacterial biofilms are likely a key modulator of the refractory nature of CRS.
Although clinical evidence from well-designed trials is scarce, European Guidelines for chronic rhinosinusitis recommend daily nasal saline irrigation for reduction of the severity of symptoms of CRS. A recent Cochrane analysis has concluded that daily nasal irrigation with hypertonic saline solution is more effective than placebo to improve patient symptoms. The exact mechanisms by which nasal irrigation works are not known. However, most of the experts agree that it is primarily a mechanical intervention leading to direct cleansing of the nasal mucosa. Nevertheless, the efficacy of such solution remains moderate.
Healsea® Chronic is a CE marked medical device indicated in adults for the treatment of nasal symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is a seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with a natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.02%) isolated from marine bacteria. The nasal solution is hypertonic (NaCl 2.2%). Symbiofilm® is a marine postbiotic comprising active exopolysaccharides with emulsifying properties and in vitro antibiofilm activity. Antibiofilm properties have been demonstrated with the colorimetric microtiter plate assay. In this model, a significant inhibition of biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae are observed. Detachment properties from human nasal epithelial cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa has also been demonstrated in vitro, suggesting an inhibition of biofilm formation at early stage in this model. Symbiofilm® has no bacteriostatic nor bactericidal activities.
To date, properly designed studies to evaluate the effect of topical therapies on microbiome are scarce so no definite conclusion can be made. In one study, use of saline irrigation with or without budesonideDCI used was not associated with significantly distinct microbiota composition among either controls or post-operative CRS patients with polyp.
This exploratory study is designed with aim to determine if the antibiofilm properties of Symbiofilm® may modify sino-nasal microbiota, impacting α and/ or β diversities. To this end middle meatus swab specimen will be taken from CRS patients before and after treatment with Healsea® Chronic. Bacteria colonization will be assessed using quantitative PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Improvement of nasal symptoms and quality of life will be assessed with the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score-22 (SNOT-22). Post-market vigilance of Healsea® Chronic and vigilance of study procedures will be assessed throughout the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test Medical Device | Healsea Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice daily (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healsea® Chronic, hypertonic seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with natural Symbiofilm® extract | Device | Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice daily (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2) | Comparaison of the values of alpha diversity of bacterial species assessed by the Shannon index at baseline and after the treatment period | At baseline (V1) and at end of the 30-day treatment period (V2) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22 | Change of SNOT-22 total score at the end of the 30-day treatment period versus baseline . A change >-9 is deemed clinically meaningful. | End of treatment (Visit 2(V2)-Day 30) versus screening/inclusion (Visit 1(V1)-Day 1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting of Adverse Events, Incidents and Expected Side Effects | Assessment of materiovigilance from the medical device (incidents, expected side effects) and reporting of adverse reactions related to the additional invasive procedure (swab of the nasal meatus) | During the intervention, up to 30 days |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The subjects will be recruited by the site among outpatients coming for routine consultation because of CRS.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pr Guillaume de Bonnecaze, MD, PhD | Department of Otorhinolaryngology , University Hospital of Toulouse (Larrey), France | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larrey Hospital | Toulouse | 31400 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32077450 | Background | Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, Toppila-Salmi S, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Mullol J, Alobid I, Terezinha Anselmo-Lima W, Bachert C, Baroody F, von Buchwald C, Cervin A, Cohen N, Constantinidis J, De Gabory L, Desrosiers M, Diamant Z, Douglas RG, Gevaert PH, Hafner A, Harvey RJ, Joos GF, Kalogjera L, Knill A, Kocks JH, Landis BN, Limpens J, Lebeer S, Lourenco O, Meco C, Matricardi PM, O'Mahony L, Philpott CM, Ryan D, Schlosser R, Senior B, Smith TL, Teeling T, Tomazic PV, Wang DY, Wang D, Zhang L, Agius AM, Ahlstrom-Emanuelsson C, Alabri R, Albu S, Alhabash S, Aleksic A, Aloulah M, Al-Qudah M, Alsaleh S, Baban MA, Baudoin T, Balvers T, Battaglia P, Bedoya JD, Beule A, Bofares KM, Braverman I, Brozek-Madry E, Richard B, Callejas C, Carrie S, Caulley L, Chussi D, de Corso E, Coste A, El Hadi U, Elfarouk A, Eloy PH, Farrokhi S, Felisati G, Ferrari MD, Fishchuk R, Grayson W, Goncalves PM, Grdinic B, Grgic V, Hamizan AW, Heinichen JV, Husain S, Ping TI, Ivaska J, Jakimovska F, Jovancevic L, Kakande E, Kamel R, Karpischenko S, Kariyawasam HH, Kawauchi H, Kjeldsen A, Klimek L, Krzeski A, Kopacheva Barsova G, Kim SW, Lal D, Letort JJ, Lopatin A, Mahdjoubi A, Mesbahi A, Netkovski J, Nyenbue Tshipukane D, Obando-Valverde A, Okano M, Onerci M, Ong YK, Orlandi R, Otori N, Ouennoughy K, Ozkan M, Peric A, Plzak J, Prokopakis E, Prepageran N, Psaltis A, Pugin B, Raftopulos M, Rombaux P, Riechelmann H, Sahtout S, Sarafoleanu CC, Searyoh K, Rhee CS, Shi J, Shkoukani M, Shukuryan AK, Sicak M, Smyth D, Sindvongs K, Soklic Kosak T, Stjarne P, Sutikno B, Steinsvag S, Tantilipikorn P, Thanaviratananich S, Tran T, Urbancic J, Valiulius A, Vasquez de Aparicio C, Vicheva D, Virkkula PM, Vicente G, Voegels R, Wagenmann MM, Wardani RS, Welge-Lussen A, Witterick I, Wright E, Zabolotniy D, Zsolt B, Zwetsloot CP. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.600. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The subjects will be recruited by the site among outpatients coming for routine consultation because of CRS. The first patient was screened and enrolled on 12th December 2022, the last patient was screened and enrolled on 25th April 2023.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Healsea® Chronic: Hypertonic Seawater-Based Nasal Spray With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract | Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice a day (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Healsea® Chronic: Hypertonic Seawater-Based Nasal Spray With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract | Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice a day (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Comparaison of Alpha-diversity of Sino-nasal Microbiota Before and After Treatment (Visit 1 and Visit 2) | Comparaison of the values of alpha diversity of bacterial species assessed by the Shannon index at baseline and after the treatment period | Full Analysis Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Shannon Index | At baseline (V1) and at end of the 30-day treatment period (V2) |
|
Adverse events/incidents were collected during the intervention and up to 30 days
In this investigation with a medical device, 3 types of adverse events were to be reported: non-related/related adverse events and serious adverse events related to the invasive procedure. No SAE has been reported.
Also, materiovigilance from the medical device (incidents, expected side effects) was to be reported. One incident was reported: Headache (Nervous system disorders).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Healsea® Chronic: Hypertonic Seawater-Based Nasal Spray With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract | Healsea® Chronic nasal spray will be administered twice a day (1 puff, 1-2 sec) in each nostril during 30 days. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Small number of subjects (12 VS 20 expected)
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Bernard Gout | BG ClinicalS | +33 (0)561 531 944 | b.gout@bgclinicals.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 14, 2021 | Dec 20, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 4, 2023 | Dec 21, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Middle meatus swabs dedicated to nasal DNA extraction from microbiota
| Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability) |
To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the medical device usability |
| Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
| Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste) | To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the sensory perception (residual taste after spraying) | Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
| Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy) | To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding product efficacy for chronic Rhinosinusitis (Cleansing and Moistening of nasal mucosa) | Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
| 30506054 | Background | Sivasubramaniam R, Douglas R. The microbiome and chronic rhinosinusitis. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct 31;4(3):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.08.004. eCollection 2018 Sep. |
| 23656607 | Background | Boase S, Foreman A, Cleland E, Tan L, Melton-Kreft R, Pant H, Hu FZ, Ehrlich GD, Wormald PJ. The microbiome of chronic rhinosinusitis: culture, molecular diagnostics and biofilm detection. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 8;13:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-210. |
| 26575518 | Background | Ramakrishnan VR, Hauser LJ, Frank DN. The sinonasal bacterial microbiome in health and disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb;24(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000221. |
| 27903594 | Background | Hoggard M, Wagner Mackenzie B, Jain R, Taylor MW, Biswas K, Douglas RG. Chronic Rhinosinusitis and the Evolving Understanding of Microbial Ecology in Chronic Inflammatory Mucosal Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Jan;30(1):321-348. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00060-16. |
| 29755418 | Background | Koeller K, Herlemann DPR, Schuldt T, Ovari A, Guder E, Podbielski A, Kreikemeyer B, Olzowy B. Microbiome and Culture Based Analysis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Compared to Healthy Sinus Mucosa. Front Microbiol. 2018 Apr 17;9:643. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00643. eCollection 2018. |
| 29204570 | Background | Fastenberg JH, Hsueh WD, Mustafa A, Akbar NA, Abuzeid WM. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 May 5;2(4):219-229. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.03.002. eCollection 2016 Dec. |
| 27115216 | Background | Chong LY, Head K, Hopkins C, Philpott C, Glew S, Scadding G, Burton MJ, Schilder AG. Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011995. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011995.pub2. |
| 21307833 | Background | O'Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp. 2011 Jan 30;(47):2437. doi: 10.3791/2437. |
| 25556553 | Background | Liu CM, Kohanski MA, Mendiola M, Soldanova K, Dwan MG, Lester R, Nordstrom L, Price LB, Lane AP. Impact of saline irrigation and topical corticosteroids on the postsurgical sinonasal microbiota. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Mar;5(3):185-90. doi: 10.1002/alr.21467. Epub 2014 Dec 29. |
| 19793277 | Background | Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x. |
| Participants |
| No |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Baseline SNOT-22 (total) | The SNOT-22 is a validated patient-reported outcome measure that captures the physical, functional,and emotional consequences of rhinosinusitis. Patients should rate sino-nasal symptoms and their impact from 0 to 5 where 0 means that there is no complaint and 5 means that there are serious complaints. The SNOT-22 score is calculated as the sum of scores provided for each question and ranges from 0 (no complaint at all) to 110. | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale |
|
| α diversity | The alpha diversity is a quantitative index measure that reflects the diversity of bacterial species in a sample. The diversity of microbiota present in the given sample was measured using the Shannon index. The greater Shannon index value, the more diverse nasal microbiota. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Shannon Index |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Impact of Healsea® Chronic on Quality of Life Assessed by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test Score-22 | Change of SNOT-22 total score at the end of the 30-day treatment period versus baseline . A change >-9 is deemed clinically meaningful. | Full Analysis Population | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | End of treatment (Visit 2(V2)-Day 30) versus screening/inclusion (Visit 1(V1)-Day 1) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Usability) | To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the medical device usability | Full Analysis Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Taste) | To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding the sensory perception (residual taste after spraying) | Full Analysis Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (Efficacy) | To assess patient 's satisfaction regarding product efficacy for chronic Rhinosinusitis (Cleansing and Moistening of nasal mucosa) | Full Analysis Population | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Visit 2(V2)-Day 30 (end of treatment) |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Reporting of Adverse Events, Incidents and Expected Side Effects | Assessment of materiovigilance from the medical device (incidents, expected side effects) and reporting of adverse reactions related to the additional invasive procedure (swab of the nasal meatus) | Not Posted | During the intervention, up to 30 days | Participants |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 2 |
| 12 |
| Mouth ulceration | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palatal disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 25.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Easy |
|
| Very easy |
|
| Pleasant |
|
| Very pleasant |
|
| Moderate improvement |
|
| Very clear improvement |
|