Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-A00613-38 | Other Identifier | French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (ANSM) |
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment long and complicated
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new SVR care product and to evaluate the reduction of the topical corticosteroids' consumption with this emollient care.
Atopic dermatitis is a vicious circle that must be broken, but certain aggravating factors are added to this circle. There is a lot of talk about pollution but, more recently, studies have been carried out on the worsening role of dust mites on atopic skin.
The SVR product is therefore based on it:
TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière is a care product that is lipid-replenishing, repairing and protective: a triple reinforced action for 48 hours: anti-scratching, anti-irritation, and anti-external aggression.
1. RATIONALE
The mainstay of treatment for Atopic dermatitis (AD) is use of emollient and topical medications. Topical corticosteroids are the gold standard of anti-inflammatory therapy in AD especially AD flare-ups, in order to reduce inflammation and pruritus. Their long-term use is associated with the risk of local and systemic adverse effects.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière and to evaluate the reduction of the topical corticosteroids' consumption with this emollient care.
2 STUDY OBJECTIVES
2.1 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the cosmetic product SVR TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière on the reduction of topical corticosteroid consumption in children from 3 months to 17 years old presenting mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (5 < SCORAD < 40), after 28 days of use.
2.2 SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: 2.2.1. To evaluate the efficacy of the study product after 28 and 56 days of use on children of 3 months to 17 years with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis by the following criteria:
Number of flare-up
SCORAD
Amount of topical corticosteroid consumption
Mean PO-SCORAD
Quality of life
Skin condition and functional skin signs
2.2.2 Evaluate the tolerance of the study product after 28 and 56 days of use on children 3 months to 17 years old with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis
2.2.3. To evaluate the persistent effect of the cosmetic product SVR TOPIALYSE Barrier Balm after 24 and 48 hours of stopping use on children from 3 months to 17 years old with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis
3 STUDY METHODOLOGY This is a multicentric, randomized and open-label study. It is an interventional study with minimal risks (Category 2).
3.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA (see outcomes part)
3.2 EVALUATION METHODS
3.2.1 Topical corticosteroid consumption Consumption of class 2 or 3 topical corticosteroids will be assessed throughout the study by the number of days of use and the weight of the topical corticosteroid tube per month.
3.2.2 SCORAD At D -37, D -7, D0, D28 and D56, the dermatologist calculates the objective SCORAD over the entire body.
A. First, the investigator assesses the distribution of atopic dermatitis by calculating the extent. For each zone, the investigator evaluates the proportion of the zone considered affected by atopic dermatitis compared to the suggested maximum score.
B. Second, the investigator scores the intensity of the following parameters: erythema, oedema/papules, oozing/crust, excoriation, lichenification and xerosis
C. Finally, the investigator questions the subjects about their subjective symptoms: pruritus abd insomnia
The total score of the objective SCORAD is obtained according to the following formula:
SCORAD = A/5 + 7 B/2 + C
3.2.3 Skin condition assessment 3.2.4 IDQOL questionnaire 3.2.5 Local tolerance assessment 3.2.6 Cutaneous functional signs assessment 3.2.7 Study product questionnaire 3.2.8 Standardized photographs
4 SELECTION OF STUDY POPULATION Sixty-two children (62) will be enrolled in the study. The subjects will be recruited via the Necker Volunteer Database or from those who spontaneously come to the Necker Children's Hospital or the Pr. Tennstedt' medical office or if needed, via press advertising after approval by the Ethics Committee.
5. DURATION OF TREATMENT, DOSING AND ADMINISTRATION 5.1 Duration of treatment Depending on the group, the tested products will be applied for fifty-six days either consecutively (Group 1) or with one application every two days (Group 2).
6 INVESTIGATIONAL PLAN 6.1 STUDY DESIGN This is a multicentric, randomized and open-label study. It is an interventional study with minimal risks (Category 2).
The study will be performed in 62 children with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. The screening of the subjects will be performed at the Necker-Enfants malades hospital and at the Pr Tennstedt medical office within three weeks (D -58) prior to the enrollment visit at D -37 and to allow verification of the subject compatibility with the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
6.1.1 Study location The study will be performed in two Investigation centers, the Necker-Enfant malades hospital, authorized by the Regional Agency of Health (ARS) to perform biomedical research and the Pr. Tennstedt medical office.
6.1.2 Study duration The study participation for each subject will last up to 3 months (21 days for screening and 95 days of clinical participation).
6.2 STUDY PROCEDURES
6.2.1 Screening visit (visit 1): D -58 to D -37 The screening visit will be performed within three weeks of the day before D -37. The following procedures may be carried on several days if needed.
The subject will have to come to the investigator site for:
Between this visit and the next:
6.2.3 Follow-up visit 1 (visit 3), end of phase 1: D -7
6.2.4 Wash-out period: D-7 to D0 After this visit, the patients have to stop using the usual emollient and the usual topical corticosteroid, weekly filling of the PO-SCORAD application and filling out the patient diary every day.
6.2.5 Follow up visit 2 (visit 4), starting phase 2: D0
Between this visit and the next:
6.2.6 Follow-up visit 3 (Visit 5), phase 2: D28
- Checking the patient diary,
Between this visit and the next:
- Use of the TOPIALYSE emollient once a day or once every 2 days depending on randomization,
6.2.7 Follow-up visit 4 (visit 6), phase 2: D56
- Checking the patient diary,
After this visit, the patients have to stop using the TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière emollient and the topical corticosteroid.
6.2.8 Follow-up visit 5, phase 2: D57 - Assessment questionnaire for skin condition,
6.2.9 Follow-up visit 6/ End of Study: D58 - Assessment questionnaire for skin condition,
- Questionnaire for assessment of tolerance and signs of skin intolerance,
- Filling the PO-SCORAD,
- Delivery of documents to the investigator centre. This part will only be done by the subject' parent and send to the study center.
7 STATISTICAL METHODS 7.1 BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS Continuous demographic variables (e.g. age, weight, and height) will be summarized, using mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum and number of available observations.
Qualitative demographic characteristics will be summarized by counts and percent. Other subject characteristics (anomalies in physical examination, prior medication, inclusion / exclusion checklist) will be listed only.
7.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSES Descriptive statistics (N, mean, standard error, min, max,) will be calculated by test product for each parameter.
Prior to any statistical analysis, the normality of each variable will be tested using the Shapiro Wilks test of normality.
Statistical Tests:
For each normal variable, comparisons will be performed using a t-test for paired data.
For each non normal variable, comparison will be performed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
7.3 NUMBER OF SUBJECTS CALCULATION In the treatment of atopic dermatitis, the use of a simple emollient makes it possible to reduce by about 10% the amount of topical corticosteroid used [33]. In the present study, it is expected that TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière applied 1 application/day will reduce the consumption of topical corticosteroid by at least 35% after 28 days of application based on the results of the study of GIORDANO-LABADIE et al, 2006. Calculation of the number of patients by the Arcsinus method shows that 31 patients would allow to detect a significant difference between TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière applied 1 application/day and the reference value 10% with a power of 95% at risk α =0.05 (bilateral test). It is also expected that TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière applied 1 application/2 days will lead to a comparable decrease, therefore 31 patients will also be included in this group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | One application of Topialyse Baume Barrière per day |
|
| Group 2 | Experimental | Two applications of Topialyse Baume Barrière per day |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topialyse Baume Barrière | Other | Evaluation of the efficacy of the cosmetic product SVR TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière on the reduction of topical corticosteroid consumption in children from 3 months to 17 years old presenting mild to moderate atopic dermatitis after 28 and 56 days of use, at one or two apllications /day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the topical corticosteroid consumption with the use of Topialyse Baume Barrière (1month) | Evaluation of the reduce of amount of topical corticosteroid by comparing the number of days of use and the weight of class 2 or 3 topical corticosteroid per month before and after the use of the cosmetic product (TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière) | DAY 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the topical corticosteroid consumption with the use of Topialyse Baume Barrière (1month) | Evaluation of the effectiveness of the cosmetic product (TOPIALYSE Baume Barrière) on the reduction of the quantity of topical corticosteroid by comparing the number of days of use and the weight of class 2 or 3 topical corticosteroid per month at D56 versus D -7. | DAY 56 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Evaluation of the efficacy of the product by reducing the number of atopic dermatitis flare-ups | Evaluation of the efficacy of the product by reducing the number of atopic dermatitis flare-ups per month at D28 and D56 versus D0. | DAY 28 and DAY 56 |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of the product by reducing the SCORAD (Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) | Evaluation of the efficacy of the product by reducing the SCORAD (Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) (Appendix n°1) at D28 and D56 versus D0 and versus D -7 and D -37. | DAY 28 and DAY 56 |
| Evaluation of the product's effectiveness by reduction of the mean PO-SCORAD (Patient Oriented Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) per month | Evaluation of the product's effectiveness by reduction of the mean PO-SCORAD (Patient Oriented Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis) (Appendix n°2) per month at D28, D56, D57 and D58 versus D0. | DAY 28, DAY 56, DAY 57 and DAY 58 |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of the product on the skin condition by a dermatologist on a 5-point scale. | Evaluation of the efficacy of the product on the skin condition (Appendix n°3) by a dermatologist on a 5-point scale (0 to 4) at D28 and D56 versus D0. | DAY 28 and DAY 56 |
| Evaluation of the efficacy of the product on the cutaneous condition. | Evaluation of the efficacy of the product on the cutaneous condition (nourished and moisturized aspect of the skin) by a self-evaluation or carried out by the volunteer's parent on a 5-point scale (0 to 4) at D28, D56, D57 and D58 versus D0. | DAY 28, DAY 56, DAY 57 and DAY 58 |
| Evaluation of the effect of the product on the improvement of the quality of life of children | Evaluation of the effect of the product on the improvement of the quality of life of children using the IDQOL (Infant's Dermatitis Quality Of Life index) questionnaire (Appendix n°4) at D28 and D56 versus D0. | DAY 28 and DAY 56 |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |