Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Washington University School of Medicine | OTHER |
| Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell | UNKNOWN |
| Rush University Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators' goal is to conduct a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the yield and outcomes of screening of pancreas cancer in individuals who are at-risk for pancreatic cancer. We plan to use International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS3) Consortium recommendations to standardize study population, screening methodology, and study outcomes.
Methods The investigators' goal is to conduct a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the yield and outcomes of pancreas cancer screening in high-risk individuals. High-risk patients who are undergoing pancreatic cancer screening in accordance with national guidelines at participating study centers will be eligible for the study. Information regarding patient characteristics, findings at screening examination, and patient outcomes will be collected.
Primary Outcome (Primary Aim):
To identify the proportion of patients who meet International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium screening criteria 3rd update (CAPS Jan 2020), or more updated national guidelines, who are found at the screening to have high-risk pancreatic lesions amenable to treatment (definition of "high-risk lesions amenable to treatment" is provided under the section on study outcomes).
Secondary outcomes (Secondary Aims) will include (details are provided under the section on study outcomes):
Screening and patient follow-up will be performed at individual study centers per standard clinical practice. Patient characteristics, screening performed and screening results, clinical outcome data will be collected by individual study centers. This data will be stored and analyzed at central study REDCap located at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients who are at high-risk for pancreatic cancer | Patients that meet the eligibility criteria based on CAPS3 or updated national pancreatic cancer screening guidelines |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screening for pancreatic cancer | Other | Screening for pancreatic cancer using EUS or MRI |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of screening patients found to have high-risk pancreatic lesions amenable to treatment | Proportion of patients who meet CAPS 3 or updated national screening guidelines criteria who are found at screening to have high-risk pancreatic lesions amenable to treatment. These are defined as the following:
| From year 1 to year 12 (until the end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032), according to the standard of care designated by GI team. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of screening patients found to have high-risk pancreatic lesions | Proportion of patients who meet CAPS screening eligibility criteria, who are found at screening to have high-risk pancreatic lesions amenable to treatment | From year 1 screening to year 12 (end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032) screening (annually) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria 1-3 are indications for pancreatic cancer screening as defined by the CAPS3 guidelines or updated national pancreatic cancer screening guidelines. Patients who do not meet these guidelines but are undergoing pancreatic cancer screening at the discretion of their treating physician at participating study centers will also be included in the study. Based upon the indication for screening, patients will be categorized as either meeting CAPS3 screening criteria, or not meeting CAPS3 screening criteria.
Familial Pancreatic cancer kindred. This is defined as family history of pancreas cancer that meet the criteria listed below.
Patients with genetic susceptibility to pancreas cancer
Screening is usually initiated at age 45 years or 10 years younger than the youngest family member with pancreatic cancer.
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome: diagnosed using clinical criteria or deleterious Breast Cancer gene 1 (BRCA1), Breast Cancer gene 2 (BRCA2), Partner and Localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2). The usual indication for screening is:
Lynch syndrome or Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) mutations with at least one affected first-degree relative (FDR). Lynch syndrome could be diagnosed either by using clinical criteria or Mutator L homolog 1 (MLH1), Mutator S homolog 2 (MSH2), Mutator S homolog 6 (MSH6), Postmeiotic Segregation Increased, S. Cerevisiae, 2 (PMS2) or EPCAM mutation.
Screening to be initiated at age 45 or 10 years younger than the youngest family member with pancreatic cancer.
Patients with hereditary pancreatitis diagnosed using clinical criteria or deleterious Serine Protease 1 (PRSS1) mutation. Screening is usually initiated at age 40 years or 10 years younger than the youngest family member with pancreatic cancer 3. New-onset diabetes, age > 50 years with weight loss. 4. Patients who do not meet these CAPS screening criteria but are determined by the site principal investigator to be high-risk for pancreatic cancer based upon family history or other risk factors, and are undergoing pancreatic cancer screening will also be included in the study. Indication for pancreatic cancer screening and age at which screening was initiated will be recorded.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Any patient who meets the eligibility criteria exposed above based on CAPS3 or updated national pancreatic screening guidelines criteria at BIDMC and collaboration centers part of the study in the time frame of 2020 to 2027 (which is the end of enrollment)
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roya Dastjerdi, MPH | Contact | 617-667-4046 | rdastjer@bidmc.harvard.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mandeep Sawhney, MD,MS,FASGE | BIDMC-Harvard Medical School | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Recruiting | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Borgida, A., Holter, S., Thomas, C., Jhaveri, K., Haider, M. A., & Gallinger, S. Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer using biannual contrast MRI. Familial Cancer, 2017, 16 (1 Supplement 1), S108 | ||
| 29803839 | Background | Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD, Yeo CJ, Klein A, Blackford A, Shin EJ, Sanyal A, Yenokyan G, Lennon AM, Kamel IR, Fishman EK, Wolfgang C, Weiss M, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Risk of Neoplastic Progression in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Long-term Surveillance. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):740-751.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.035. Epub 2018 May 24. | |
| 29775792 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 13, 2024 | Apr 21, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C535836 | Pancreatic cancer, adult |
| C535837 | Pancreatic carcinoma, familial |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008403 | Mass Screening |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D006306 | Health Surveys |
| D011795 | Surveys and Questionnaires |
Not provided
Not provided
| Wake Forest University |
| OTHER |
| University of Arkansas | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Proportion of screening patients found to have low or moderate-risk pancreatic lesions by screening |
Proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic cancer screening who are found to have low or moderate-risk pancreatic lesions. Low or moderate-risk pancreatic lesions pancreatic lesions are defined as:
|
| From year 1 to year 12 (end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032) according to the standard of care designated by GI team. |
| Proportion of patients undergoing screening who undergo pancreatic surgery | Proportion of patients who undergo pancreatic surgery as a result of screening test results following the Fukuoka revised guidelines for the management for high-risk lesions or surgical treatment designated by interdisciplinary medical team | From year 1 to year 12, which is the end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032.(throughout the duration of the study) |
| Proportion of "low yield" pancreatic surgeries performed in screening patients | Proportion of patients who undergo "low-yield pancreatic surgery" as a result of screening test results. Low yield pancreatic surgery is defined surgery where surgical pathology does not yield high-risk pancreatic lesions. See primary outcome for definition of high-risk pancreatic lesions. | From year 1 to year 12, which is the end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032.(throughout the duration of the study) |
| Proportion of screening patients who undergo non-pancreatic surgery | Proportion of patients who undergo non- pancreatic surgery as a result of screening test results. | From year 1 to year 12 (the end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032), according to the standard of care designated by GI team |
| Proportion of screening patients who experience complications/adverse events of screen-related procedures | Proportion of patients who experienced any complications or adverse events due to screen-related procedures as Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS), Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or others that have been designated by attending in the GI department. Complications and adverse events will be aggregated to be reported as one value (complications/adverse events). Complications, defined as adverse events that emphasize direct causality between medical care and the adverse outcome or event. Adverse event, defined as an event that may or may not be preventable or result from a medical error | From year 1 to year 12 (the end of at least 5 years follow up in 2032), according to standard of care designated by GI team |
| Background |
| Corral JE, Mareth KF, Riegert-Johnson DL, Das A, Wallace MB. Diagnostic Yield From Screening Asymptomatic Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(1):41-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.065. Epub 2018 Jun 30. |
| 29683970 | Background | Gangi A, Malafa M, Klapman J. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Based Pancreatic Cancer Screening of High-Risk Individuals: A Prospective Observational Trial. Pancreas. 2018 May/Jun;47(5):586-591. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001038. |
| 31672839 | Background | Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R, Syngal S, Del Chiaro M, Bartsch DK, Bassi C, Carrato A, Farrell J, Fishman EK, Fockens P, Gress TM, van Hooft JE, Hruban RH, Kastrinos F, Klein A, Lennon AM, Lucas A, Park W, Rustgi A, Simeone D, Stoffel E, Vasen HFA, Cahen DL, Canto MI, Bruno M; International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) consortium. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut. 2020 Jan;69(1):7-17. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319352. Epub 2019 Oct 31. |
| 33077384 | Background | Kogekar N, Diaz KE, Weinberg AD, Lucas AL. Surveillance of high-risk individuals for pancreatic cancer with EUS and MRI: A meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2020 Dec;20(8):1739-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Oct 9. |
| Background | Kwon, R., Dust, H., McCarthy, S., Hosmer, A., Carulli, A., Scheiman, J., . . . Stoffel, E Outcomes of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high risk individuals. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, 114 (Supplement), S19. |
| 30309438 | Background | Lachter J, Rosenberg C, Hananiya T, Khamaysi I, Klein A, Yassin K, Half E. Screening to Detect Precursor Lesions of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in High-risk Individuals: A Single-center Experience. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Oct 4;9(4):e0029. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10353. |
| 24840647 | Background | Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. |
| 31912902 | Background | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8. |
| 28735806 | Background | Tanaka M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Kamisawa T, Jang JY, Levy P, Ohtsuka T, Salvia R, Shimizu Y, Tada M, Wolfgang CL. Revisions of international consensus Fukuoka guidelines for the management of IPMN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(5):738-753. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Jul 13. |
| 30285076 | Background | van Roessel S, Kasumova GG, Verheij J, Najarian RM, Maggino L, de Pastena M, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Ng SC, de Geus SW, Lof S, Giovinazzo F, van Dam JL, Kent TS, Busch OR, van Eijck CH, Koerkamp BG, Abu Hilal M, Bassi C, Tseng JF, Besselink MG. International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):e183617. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3617. Epub 2018 Dec 19. |
| 37141538 | Derived | Shah I, Silva-Santisteban A, Germansky KA, Trindade A, Raphael KL, Kushnir V, Pawa R, Mishra G, Anastasiou J, Inamdar S, Tharian B, Bilal M, Sawhney MS. Pancreatic Cancer Screening for At-Risk Individuals (Pancreas Scan Study): Yield, Harms, and Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 1;118(9):1664-1670. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002314. Epub 2023 May 4. |
| D003625 | Data Collection |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D003954 | Diagnostic Services |
| D011314 | Preventive Health Services |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
| D017531 | Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D017530 | Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
| D011634 | Public Health |
| D004778 | Environment and Public Health |
| D015980 | Public Health Practice |