Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5R03DK129626-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study addresses the need to rigorously advance the science and understanding of the development, feasibility, acceptability and adoption of novel culturally-sensitive motivational strategies to improve dialysis treatment adherence among African Americans with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study specifically aims to:
Hemodialysis treatment non-adherence is a public health issue because of its association with excessive hospitalizations, high morbidity, mortality, and increased financial costs. Compared to whites, African Americans have a four-fold higher prevalence of end stage kidney disease (EKSD), higher non-adherence rates to hemodialysis, and higher odds of hospitalizations. Motivational interviewing, an evidence-based intervention that creates a bond between patients and providers, targets improvement in motivation-related psychosocial factors associated with adherence behaviors. Interventions for such factors are typically developed based on the dominant culture and may not be valid and generalizable to minority groups. Culturally tailored interventions lead to more durable change in African Americans yet there is a lack of studies testing the efficacy of such approaches to improve hemodialysis treatment adherence in African Americans. Use of culturally tailored motivational interviewing in African Americans with ESKD will promote health equity by improving dialysis treatment adherence, reducing hospitalizations, and enhancing other critical outcomes.
Our long-term goal is to establish culturally sensitive strategies and multi-level interactions to improve outcomes in kidney disease. The overall objective of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of a culturally tailored motivational interviewing intervention developed using a rigorous theoretical framework on improving hemodialysis treatment adherence in African Americans with ESKD. The central hypothesis is that culturally tailored motivational interviewing will lead to improved hemodialysis treatment adherence. We will test this hypothesis in the following Specific Aims in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in African American patients with ESKD. Compared to usual dialysis care, we aim to: Evaluate the efficacy of 8 weeks of culturally tailored motivational interviewing (MoVE) on improving hemodialysis adherence at (1) 3 months, and (2) 6 months post-randomization. At the successful completion of the proposed research, the expected outcomes will include evidence of the efficacy of culturally tailored motivational interviewing on improving hemodialysis treatment adherence in African American patients with ESKD. The proposed research is innovative because of the novel application of a culturally tailored, evidence-based behavioral intervention developed using a rigorous theoretical network (PEN-3); the use of specifically-trained health coaches to optimize the intervention delivery; and the focus on understanding and overrepresented African American patients with ESKD to address the public health issue of hemodialysis treatment of non-adherence. Study results will provide a strong basis for conducting an effectiveness and implementation trial, which is expected to have a significant impact on hemodialysis adherence, hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality. This research strongly aligns with NIDDK's mission to promote health equity by addressing health disparities in kidney disease.
Hemodialysis treatment non-adherence is an important modifiable contributor to end stage kidney disease (ESKD), with critical public health relevance to patients, providers, and health systems due to its association with excessive hospitalizations, exorbitant financial burden, and increase morbidity and mortality. Compared to Whites, African Americans ESKD patients have a four-fold higher ESKD prevalence, persistently higher hospitalization and rehospitalization risk, and higher rates of dialysis treatment non-adherence. The goals of this proposal are to: (1) evaluate the efficacy of culturally tailored motivational interviewing on improving hemodialysis treatment adherence in African Americans; (2) provide a strong basis for conducting a future effectiveness and implementation trial using evidence-based, culturally tailored motivational interviewing intervention to improve hemodialysis adherence, and reduce hospitalizations, morbidity, mortality, and exorbitant financial burden associated with dialysis treatment non-adherence; and (3) promote health equity by reducing existing health disparities and optimizing outcomes in ESKD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care | No Intervention | Standard of Care | |
| Intervention | Experimental | Motivational interviewing intervention |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motivational interviewing | Behavioral | In this trial, motivational interviewing (MI) is the intervention. The MI sessions will embody the spirit of MI (PACE - Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion and Evocation) and the use of MI strategies (OARS - Open-ended questions, Affirmations, Reflections and Summaries) and MI communication processes (engagement, focusing, evoking and planning). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Dialysis Treatment Adherence | Abstraction of dialysis treatment adherence data from the dialysis units' records which includes data on every treatment that occurred or should have occurred within the time frame. Records will reflect dialysis treatments which were completed, shortened, missed or did not occur due to hospitalizations, ER visits or travel. | Week 8, i.e. the maintenance phase, days 31 through 60 post-randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Autonomous Regulation | Change in autonomous regulation will be measured by the 6-item Autonomous Regulation (AR) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous regulation, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous regulation | Week 8 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ebele M Umeukeje, MD, MPH | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanderbilt Dialysis Clinic | Nashville | Tennessee | 37204 | United States | ||
| Vanderbilt Dialysis Clinic East |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Control | Standard Care |
| FG001 | Intervention | Motivational interviewing intervention Motivational interviewing: In this trial, motivational interviewing (MI) is the intervention. The MI sessions will embody the spirit of MI (PACE - Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion and Evocation) and the use of MI strategies (OARS - Open-ended questions, Affirmations, Reflections and Summaries) and MI communication processes (engagement, focusing, evoking and planning). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Control | Standard Care |
| BG001 | Intervention | Motivational interviewing intervention Motivational interviewing: In this trial, motivational interviewing (MI) is the intervention. The MI sessions will embody the spirit of MI (PACE - Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion and Evocation) and the use of MI strategies (OARS - Open-ended questions, Affirmations, Reflections and Summaries) and MI communication processes (engagement, focusing, evoking and planning). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Dialysis Treatment Adherence | Abstraction of dialysis treatment adherence data from the dialysis units' records which includes data on every treatment that occurred or should have occurred within the time frame. Records will reflect dialysis treatments which were completed, shortened, missed or did not occur due to hospitalizations, ER visits or travel. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of minutes completed | Week 8, i.e. the maintenance phase, days 31 through 60 post-randomization |
|
6 months
If a patient experienced an adverse event during the study, then the health coach or research assistant would notify the PI immediately , who would follow-up with the patient directly.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Control | Standard Care | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Ebele Umeukeje | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | 615-322-3221 | ebele.m.umeukeje@vumc.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 10, 2022 | Jan 9, 2024 | Prot_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 22, 2024 | Feb 23, 2024 | SAP_002.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | May 20, 2022 | Mar 29, 2024 | ICF_003.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D062405 | Motivational Interviewing |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D037001 | Directive Counseling |
| D003376 | Counseling |
| D008605 | Mental Health Services |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Change in Autonomy Support | Change in autonomy support will be measured by the 6-item Health Care Climate (HCC) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous support, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous support. | Week 8 |
| Change in Perceived Competence | Change in perceived competence will be measured by the 8-item Perceived Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale (PKDSMS) questionnaire.Each question ranges in score from 1 to 5. Four of the items (#s 1, 2, 6, 7) are reversed-scored. The score is the sum of the 8 individual items. The total PKDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's (dialysis). | Week 8 |
| Change in Apathy | Change in apathy will be measured by the 7-item Apathy Evaluation Scale survey (AES-S) which measures three domains of apathy: deficits in goal-directed behavior; a decrement in goal-related thought content; and emotional indifference with flat affect. Each question ranges in score from 1 to 4. Item 3 is reverse-scored and then the sum of the 7 item scores is calculated. Range of scores is 7-28, with higher scores indicating more apathy. | Week 8 |
| Change in Optimism | Change in optimism will be measured by the 10-item Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) questionnaire which assesses individual differences in generalized optimism versus pessimism. Only 6 of the 10 items on the revised LOT are used to derive an optimism score. Four of the items are filler items and are not used in scoring. Of the 6 survey questions utilized, each question ranges in score from 1 to 5. Thus, scores in principle can range from 6 to 30. There are no 'cut-offs' for optimism or pessimism; the scale is a continuous dimension of variability between the two with higher scores indicating high optimism (low pessimism) and lower scores indicating high pessimism (low optimism). | Week 8 |
| Perceived Expectancies Index | The Dispositional Optimism items are #s 1, 3, 5, & 7; The Perceived Competence items are #s 2, 4, 6, & 8. Items # 2, 5, 6, & 7 need to be reverse scored. The overall score is calculated by summating the scores after reverse scoring 2,5,6, and 7. The score ranges from 8-48 with 48 being the highest perceived expectancies. The score can also be broken down into the above scales. | 8 Weeks |
| Nashville |
| Tennessee |
| 37214 |
| United States |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Adherence | Percentage of prescribed minutes attended in dialysis sessions not canceled for travel or hospitalization | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of minutes completed |
|
| Perceived Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale | The Perceived Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale (PKDSMS), is a measure to assess how dialysis patients view their self-efficacy in regard to dialysis treatment adherence. Four of the items (#s 1, 2, 6, 7) are reversed-scored. The score is the sum of the 8 individual items. The total PKDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's (dialysis). | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
| Perceived Expectancies Index | The Dispositional Optimism items are #s 1, 3, 5, & 7; The Perceived Competence items are #s 2, 4, 6, & 8. Items # 2, 5, 6, & 7 need to be reverse scored. The overall score is calculated by summating the scores after reverse scoring 2,5,6, and 7. The score ranges from 8-48 with 48 being the highest perceived expectancies. The score can also be broken down into the above scales. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
| Life Orientation Test - Revised | Change in optimism will be measured by the 10-item Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) questionnaire which assesses individual differences in generalized optimism versus pessimism. Only 6 of the 10 items on the revised LOT are used to derive an optimism score. Of the 6 survey questions utilized, each question ranges in score from 1 to 5. Thus, scores in principle can range from 6 to 30. The scale is a continuous dimension of variability between optimism and pessimism with higher scores indicating high optimism (low pessimism) and lower scores indicating high pessimism (low optimism). | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
| Healthcare Climate Questionnaire | Change in autonomy support will be measured by the 6-item Health Care Climate (HCC) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous support, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous support. | Only 14 control participants were captured for this survey. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
| Autonomous Regulation | Change in autonomous regulation will be measured by the 6-item Autonomous Regulation (AR) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous regulation, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous regulation | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
| Apathy Evaluation Scale | Change in apathy will be measured by the 7-item Apathy Evaluation Scale survey (AES-S) which measures three domains of apathy: deficits in goal-directed behavior; a decrement in goal-related thought content; and emotional indifference with flat affect. Each question ranges in score from 1 to 4. Item 3 is reverse-scored and then the sum of the 7 item scores is calculated. Range of scores is 7-28, with higher scores indicating more apathy. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | units on a scale |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Autonomous Regulation | Change in autonomous regulation will be measured by the 6-item Autonomous Regulation (AR) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous regulation, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous regulation | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 of those completed the AR survey - the remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Autonomy Support | Change in autonomy support will be measured by the 6-item Health Care Climate (HCC) questionnaire. Questions range in score from 1 to 7, and overall score is a mean of all items (range 1 - 7). Lower scores reflect less autonomous support, and higher scores reflect greater autonomous support. | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 participants completed the (HCC) questionnaire. The remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perceived Competence | Change in perceived competence will be measured by the 8-item Perceived Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale (PKDSMS) questionnaire.Each question ranges in score from 1 to 5. Four of the items (#s 1, 2, 6, 7) are reversed-scored. The score is the sum of the 8 individual items. The total PKDSMS score can range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating more confidence in self-managing one's (dialysis). | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 participants completed the (PKDSMS) questionnaire. The remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Apathy | Change in apathy will be measured by the 7-item Apathy Evaluation Scale survey (AES-S) which measures three domains of apathy: deficits in goal-directed behavior; a decrement in goal-related thought content; and emotional indifference with flat affect. Each question ranges in score from 1 to 4. Item 3 is reverse-scored and then the sum of the 7 item scores is calculated. Range of scores is 7-28, with higher scores indicating more apathy. | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 participants completed the (AES-S) survey. The remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Optimism | Change in optimism will be measured by the 10-item Life Orientation Test - Revised (LOT-R) questionnaire which assesses individual differences in generalized optimism versus pessimism. Only 6 of the 10 items on the revised LOT are used to derive an optimism score. Four of the items are filler items and are not used in scoring. Of the 6 survey questions utilized, each question ranges in score from 1 to 5. Thus, scores in principle can range from 6 to 30. There are no 'cut-offs' for optimism or pessimism; the scale is a continuous dimension of variability between the two with higher scores indicating high optimism (low pessimism) and lower scores indicating high pessimism (low optimism). | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 participants completed the (LOT-R) questionnaire. The remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Perceived Expectancies Index | The Dispositional Optimism items are #s 1, 3, 5, & 7; The Perceived Competence items are #s 2, 4, 6, & 8. Items # 2, 5, 6, & 7 need to be reverse scored. The overall score is calculated by summating the scores after reverse scoring 2,5,6, and 7. The score ranges from 8-48 with 48 being the highest perceived expectancies. The score can also be broken down into the above scales. | 14 participants were reflected in the intervention arm of the participant flow module. Only 12 participants completed the survey. The remaining 2 dropped out of the study. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | score on a scale | 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| 0 |
| 15 |
| EG001 | Intervention | Motivational interviewing intervention Motivational interviewing: In this trial, motivational interviewing (MI) is the intervention. The MI sessions will embody the spirit of MI (PACE - Partnership, Acceptance, Compassion and Evocation) and the use of MI strategies (OARS - Open-ended questions, Affirmations, Reflections and Summaries) and MI communication processes (engagement, focusing, evoking and planning). | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|