Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| R. P. Chiacchierini Consulting, LLC | INDUSTRY |
| Analytic Solutions Group | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The CochlearTM Osia®2 System was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration November 15, 2019 (K191921) for individuals aged 12 years and older who present with conductive or mixed hearing loss (up to 55 dB HL) or single-sided-deafness (SSD).Published and unpublished data suggest significant pre to postoperative benefit and minimal risk in both children and adults who have received the Osia system. Thus the objective of this study is to examine the safety and effectiveness of the Cochlear Osia 2 system in a group of pediatric subjects aged 5 to 11 years who suffer from conductive or mixed hearing loss (up to 55 dB HL), or single-sided-deafness (SSD) with the intent of expanding the indications for use.
The CochlearTM Osia®2 System was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration November 15, 2019 (K191921) for individuals aged 12 years and older who present with conductive or mixed hearing loss (up to 55 dB HL) or single-sided-deafness (SSD). Published and unpublished data suggest significant pre to postoperative benefit and minimal risk in both children and adults who have received the Osia system. Due to the success of the Osia 2 system in the United States within the currently indicated patient population, clinical providers have since requested the ability to use the Osia 2 system in children aged 11 years and younger who meet the audiometric requirements. As the Osia 2 system is based on existing bone conduction and cochlear implant technologies which each possess a younger age of implantation requirement (5 years for bone conduction and 9 months for cochlear implantation), the current proposal is to align the age at implantation requirement with existing surgical bone conduction technology such as the Baha Connect and Baha Attract Systems to 5 years of age. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the safety and effectiveness of the Cochlear Osia 2 system in a group of pediatric subjects aged 5 to 11 years who suffer from conductive or mixed hearing loss (up to 55 dB HL), or single-sided-deafness (SSD) with the intent of expanding the indications for use.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| To demonstrate the safety of the Osia 2 System in a pediatric population aged 5 - 11 years. | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osia 2 System | Device | Osia 2 System in a pediatric population aged 5 - 11 years by quantifying the type, frequency and severity of adverse events. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Adverse Events Quantified by Type and Severity Between Implantation and 6-months Post-surgery. | Adverse events were reported from the time of implantation through 6-months. | From implantation to 6 months post-surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to 6-months Post-surgery in SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) Parent Questionnaire | Measuring change of speech, spatial, quality and conversational uses of hearing (27 items in 4 sections). Each item is scored by the parent on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 corresponds to "not at all" and 10 to "perfectly" when rating their child's ability to hear and listen in everyday situations. The score of a participant is determined as the mean of the scores for the 4 different sections. Higher scores indicate less hearing disability. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects aged 5 to 11 years of age with the following audiometric criterion:
Prior experience with amplified sound through properly fitted amplification device such as a hearing aid, a CROS device, or a bone conduction device on a softband or sound arc.
Parent or legal guardian who is willing and able to provide written informed consent for the study participant.
Note: Subjects may include individuals seeking new implantation unilaterally (in one ear) or individuals already implanted with a bone-anchored device seeking a second-side implant (sequential bilateral)
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lori O'Neill | Cochlear | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barrow Neurological Institute | Phoenix | Arizona | 85013 | United States | ||
| Stanford University |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40214186 | Derived | Stevens SM, Meyer A, Rivas A, Mowry S, Carvalho D, Chang KW, Germiller J, Liu YC, Tejani V. Outcomes Following Cochlear Osia 2 Implantation in Patients Ages 5-11 Years: A Multi-Center Trial. Laryngoscope. 2025 Aug;135(8):2958-2966. doi: 10.1002/lary.32159. Epub 2025 Apr 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Cochlear do not have an approved platform for public sharing of IPD collected in this study. Data may be provided to individual researchers on request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants were recruited at seven US-based sites. The first participant was enrolled on 26 January 2022 and the last participant completed the study on 14 March 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Implanted With the Osia 2 System | Osia 2 System in a pediatric population aged 5 - 11 years. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Implanted With the Osia 2 System | Osia 2 System in a pediatric population aged 5 - 11 years. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Adverse Events Quantified by Type and Severity Between Implantation and 6-months Post-surgery. | Adverse events were reported from the time of implantation through 6-months. | 1 participant withdrew after the 4-week follow-up visit. | Posted | Number | Number of events | From implantation to 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
12 months
Adverse events were reported from the time of implantation through 12-months post-op.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Implanted With the Osia 2 System | Osia 2 System in a pediatric population aged 5 - 11 years. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ear Infection | Ear and labyrinth disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implant Pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRS Specialist, Clinical Affairs | Cochlear | +61 2 9428 6555 | cltd-prs-admin@cochlear.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 6, 2023 | Apr 17, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 9, 2021 | Apr 17, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D046089 | Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural |
| D006314 | Hearing Loss, Conductive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
| Change From Baseline to 4-weeks Post-surgery in Unaided Bone Conduction Thresholds. | The Pure Tone Average (PTA) is calculated as an average of the bone conduction thresholds collected at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. This measure was collected unaided both pre- and post-operatively to ensure no shift in bone conduction hearing as a result of the surgery. | Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks post-surgery |
| Change in Word Recognition Using Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) Words Presented in Quiet From Unaided Baseline to Aided 6-months Post-surgery. | The CNC Words test consists of 10 recorded lists of 50 monosyllabic words. For this study, one list is administered per test condition at 60 dBA in sound field and scored as the number of phonemes and words correct, which will be expressed as a percentage correct when analyzed. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores. | Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
| Change in Sentence Recognition in Noise Using the Bramford Kowal Bench Speech-In-Noise (BKB-SIN) From Unaided Baseline to Aided 6-months Post-surgery. | The Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence in Noise test (BKB-SIN) consists of 36 paired lists. List of sentences are presented at 65 dBA with the level of noise varied stepwise at fixed signal to noise ratio to obtain a Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) where participants are able to repeat key words 50% of the time. Score range is not specified as metric is adaptive; lower scores indicate better performance. | Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
| Palo Alto |
| California |
| 94304 |
| United States |
| Rady Children's Hospital | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| Children's Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55404 | United States |
| University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Texas Children's Hospital | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to 6-months Post-surgery in SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) Parent Questionnaire | Measuring change of speech, spatial, quality and conversational uses of hearing (27 items in 4 sections). Each item is scored by the parent on a scale of 0 to 10 where 0 corresponds to "not at all" and 10 to "perfectly" when rating their child's ability to hear and listen in everyday situations. The score of a participant is determined as the mean of the scores for the 4 different sections. Higher scores indicate less hearing disability. | One participant withdrew prior to the 6-month visit. One participant was unable to complete the questionnaire during the 6-month visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to 4-weeks Post-surgery in Unaided Bone Conduction Thresholds. | The Pure Tone Average (PTA) is calculated as an average of the bone conduction thresholds collected at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. This measure was collected unaided both pre- and post-operatively to ensure no shift in bone conduction hearing as a result of the surgery. | 3 participants were unable to be included due to improper testing pre- and post-operatively. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | dB HL (decibel Hearing Level) | Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Word Recognition Using Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) Words Presented in Quiet From Unaided Baseline to Aided 6-months Post-surgery. | The CNC Words test consists of 10 recorded lists of 50 monosyllabic words. For this study, one list is administered per test condition at 60 dBA in sound field and scored as the number of phonemes and words correct, which will be expressed as a percentage correct when analyzed. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores. | One participant withdrew prior to the 6-month visit. One participant was unable to complete the CNC word test during the baseline visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of correct words | Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Sentence Recognition in Noise Using the Bramford Kowal Bench Speech-In-Noise (BKB-SIN) From Unaided Baseline to Aided 6-months Post-surgery. | The Bamford-Kowal-Bench Sentence in Noise test (BKB-SIN) consists of 36 paired lists. List of sentences are presented at 65 dBA with the level of noise varied stepwise at fixed signal to noise ratio to obtain a Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) where participants are able to repeat key words 50% of the time. Score range is not specified as metric is adaptive; lower scores indicate better performance. | One participant withdrew prior to the 6-month visit. One participant was unable to complete the BKB-SIN testing during the baseline visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | db SNR (decibel Speech to Noise Ratio) | Baseline before surgery, 6 months post-surgery |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 49 |
| 7 |
| 49 |
| 23 |
| 49 |
| Wound dehiscence | General disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tissue Breakdown | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Congenital Defect/Deformity | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin Inflammation/Irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hematoma | Vascular disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear Infection | Ear and labyrinth disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral Infection | Infections and infestations | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory Tract Infection | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | IMDRF Annex E | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Sponsor has first rights to publish the multi-site data. During the study and the 12-months following the conclusion of the study, the PI may not publish or present on its own data obtained under the study. The PI may publish on their own study data (without permission from the Sponsor) or the consolidated data (with written consent from the Sponsor) by providing notice and a copy of the publication to the Sponsor at least 30 days prior to submission and allowing the Sponsor 30 days to review.
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |