Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study proposal is to deploy a wearable solution that predicts physiological perturbation comparable to invasive devices and to perform continuous remote patient monitoring; this will be connected to a structured, cascading, escalation pathway involving home health nurses, advanced practitioner providers, and heart failure specialists, and has the potential to transform heart failure management in the post-discharge period, where patients are the most vulnerable for readmission. This feasibility study will contribute to the understanding of post-discharge heart failure continuous remote patient monitoring, promote patient self-care, and has the potential of improving patient outcomes.
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital readmission. It results in significant mortality, morbidity, and health care utilization. Effective continuous remote patient monitoring (CRPM) can reduce readmissions, but it has only been realized via invasive monitoring. The study will focus on non-invasive heart failure CRPM through a structured cascading and escalating alert system. In this feasibility study, the study team will use a wearable biosensor and collect ambulatory physiological data that are analyzed by machine learning algorithms, potentially identifying physiological perturbation in heart failure patients. Alerts from this algorithm may be cascaded with other patient status data to inform management by the home health team via a structured protocol. The escalation pathway will engage home health, advanced practitioner providers, and heart failure specialists. In the first aim, the study team will perform a soft launch on five patients with an extensive evaluation to assess feasibility for the pilot trial. In aim 2, the study team will implement the feasibility pilot study. In aim 2a, the study team will conduct surveys and semi-structured interviews with both providers and patients. The surveys and interviews will be applied at three time points (initiation, maintenance, and post-study) to evaluate perceptions, acceptance, and experience of this CRPM solution. In aim 2b, the investigators will leverage temporal data mining, feature extraction, and patient clustering methods to identify valid patterns associated with the pathophysiological events of interest, using continuous physiological data, patient reports, and electronic health record data. The study team will also compare outcome and process measures from our pilot study to a retrospective cohort matched for key demographics and disease severity. This feasibility study will provide key learning for a larger efficacy clinical trial to evaluate if this non-invasive telemonitoring solution tied to structured patient management via cascading and escalating alert pathways can improve outcomes and reduce heart failure readmission.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot | Experimental | 39 eligible HF patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway | Other | Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment Rate | Enrollment rate for entire patient cohort | Through study completion, an average 1 year |
| Adherence Rate | Patient adherence to electronic patient reported outcomes | Through study completion, an average of one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Documented Diuretic Escalation | Number of patients on escalated diuretics dosage by the clinical care team during monitoring period | 30 days from patient discharge date |
| 30-day Readmission Rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nirav S Shah | Endeavor Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Hospital | Evanston | Illinois | 60201 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study approached a total of 61 potential participants that signed that consent forms. Out of which 39 completed the study, 16 were screen failed and 6 withdrew the consent.
15 providers participated in the study
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pilot | 39 eligible HF patients Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway: Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team Affective Analysis of Participant Response to Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring: Surveys and interviews with enrolled participants |
| FG001 | 15 HF Providers Were Included in the Study | HF providers who were part of advanced cardiology services were included in the study Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway: Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Baseline characteristics and/or adverse events were not collected from clinical team staff.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pilot | 39 eligible HF patients and 15 HF providers Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway: Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team Affective Analysis of Participant Response to Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring: Surveys and interviews with enrolled participants Baseline characteristics were not collected for HF proivders |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Enrollment Rate | Enrollment rate for entire patient cohort | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average 1 year |
|
|
Adverse event data was collected for 30 days after discharge for the enrolled HF patients. HF providers were not monitored/assessed for adverse events.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pilot - 39 Eligible HF Patients | 39 eligible HF patients Non-invasive continuous remote monitoring with structured escalation pathway: Continuous patient monitoring through non-invasive biosensors coupled with machine learning algorithms, with a structured escalation and communication pathway for home health providers and HF care team Affective Analysis of Participant Response to Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring: Surveys and interviews with enrolled participants |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Nirav Shah | NorthShore University HealthSystem | 847-657-5959 | nshah2@northshore.org |
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 12, 2022 | Nov 19, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Affective Analysis of Participant Response to Continuous Remote Patient Monitoring | Other | Surveys and interviews with enrolled participants |
|
30-day readmission rate from the day of discharge
| 30 days from patient discharge date |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Smoking | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Comorbidities | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Heart Failure Severity | Heart failure severity is described based on New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification and type of heart failure: Class I - No physical activity limitation. Ordinary activity doesn't cause fatigue, palpitations, or breathlessness. Class II - Slight limitation. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitations, breathlessness, or chest pain. Class III - Marked limitation. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity triggers symptoms. Class IV - Symptoms at rest. Any activity worsens discomfort. Higher class indicates greater severity. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ejection Fraction | Ejection fraction (EF) is a measurement, expressed as a percentage, of how much blood the left ventricle pumps out with each contraction. A normal heart's ejection fraction is between 55 and 70 percent. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Percentage |
|
| Ejection Fraction Type | Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): Patients with ejection fraction of greater than or equal to 50% Heart failure mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF): Patients with ejection fraction ejection fraction between 41% and 49% Heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): Patients with ejection fraction of less than or equal to 39% | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE) Readmission Risk Score | Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE) is a custom 30-day readmission risk prediction model that detects patient deterioration. The score is presented in percentage (0-100%). Higher percentage score represents higher risk of readmission. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Percentage |
|
| Insurance Type | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Discharge Medications | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Adherence Rate | Patient adherence to electronic patient reported outcomes | Number of patients completed at least 80% of the electronic patient reported outcomes survey | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Through study completion, an average of one year |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Documented Diuretic Escalation | Number of patients on escalated diuretics dosage by the clinical care team during monitoring period | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days from patient discharge date |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 30-day Readmission Rate | 30-day readmission rate from the day of discharge | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days from patient discharge date |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 39 |
| 0 |
| 39 |
| 0 |
| 39 |
Not provided
Not provided