Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To study the effect of arthroscopy on the treatment of hip diseases and to evaluate the regularity and treatment of hip joint diseases.
To study the clinical effect of arthroscopic treatment in patients with hip disease, a retrospective study was conducted on 600 patients with hip disease from January 2011 to January 2016. All patients underwent preoperative examinations. These included preoperative supine anteroposterior hip radiographs, cross-lateral radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging.Preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including visual analogue scale (VAS), international hip prognostic instrument-12 (IHOT-12), and modified Harris hip score (MHHS), were evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| patients accepted hip arthroscopy | patients with hip diseases and accepted hip arthroscopy in Peking University Third Hospital |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hip arthroscopy | Procedure | Use epidural anesthesia or general anesthesia. The patient lies on the orthopedic traction bed to protect the perineum and perform traction of the lower limbs on the surgical side. Under arthroscopy, check the labrum, acetabular articular surface and femoral head cartilage, and round ligament in turn. The acetabular labrum with tear degeneration was treated with labrum suture or labrum revision surgery according to the injury. Perform femoral head and neck plastic or acetabular plastic surgery, osteoid osteoma debridement, etc. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain. | 1 year after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain. | 2 years after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | Visual Analog Scale (VAS), The highest score was 10, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the more obvious the pain. | 5 years after operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). | The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. | 1 year after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
We evaluated consecutive patients who were diagnosed with hip diseases (i.e. FAI, Acetabulum labrum tear) and who underwent hip arthroscopy at our hospital between January 2011 and January 2016.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| yan xu | Peking University Third Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peking University Third Hospital | Beijing | 100083 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057925 | Femoracetabular Impingement |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. |
| 2 years after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). | The International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12).The highest score was 120, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. | 5 years after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 1 year after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). | Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. | 1 year after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 2 years after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). | Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. | 2 years after operation |
| The patient was followed up at 5 years after surgery to evaluate modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). | Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS).The highest score was 44, and the lowest was 0. The higher the score, the better the postoperative recovery. | 5 years after operation |