Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils

Bare Platinum Coils Versus Second-generation Hydrocoils for the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: a Randomized Controlled Study

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between bare platinum coil group and second-generation hydrogel coils for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

The investigators aimed to analyze whether the use of second-generation hydrogel coils for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms improves clinical and angiographic outcomes compared with the use of bare platinum coils.

Inclusion Criteria:

• 19 year old or older
• untreated ruptured intracranial aneurysms with an anatomy such that endovascular treatment with either bare platinum or second-generation hydrogel coils was considered feasible.
• person who agreed to study

Exclusion Criteria:

• contrast allgery (+)
• combined other intracranial lesions (tumor, moyamoya disease, cerebral vascular diseases)
• ineligible for coil embolization