Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of fenestration decompression combined with secondary curettage (FDSC) in the surgical treatment of jaw ameloblastoma.
Methods: Medical records of patients diagnosed as multicystic ameloblastoma (MA) or unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) by routine pathology were collected from January 2010 to December 2017 in Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University Medical College. Patients were divided into two groups based on the management regimen: FDSC group, and local curettage (LC) group. Patients were followed up for 3-8 years, using panoramic radiography to measure the change of the area of the cystic cavity involved in ameloblastoma and the recurrence or malignant transformation of the tumor in both groups. A total of 233 eligible patients were selected for provisional screening, including 145 patients with MA, and 88 patients with UA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenestration decompression combined with secondary curettage (FDSC) | Design of the opening window reasonablyï¼›Making cyst plugï¼›secondary curettage |
| |
| local curettage (LC) | The tumor was removed by local curettage only |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fenestration decompression combined with secondary curettage | Procedure | First,fenestration decompression was performed. then, patients return every 3 months for follow up. If the cystic cavity area was gradually reduced after one year of follow-up, patients should be considered for secondary curettage surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cystic cavity area reduction efficiency | (good effect case number + moderate effect case number)/total case number | 3 years after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor recurrence rate | the recurrence case number/total case number | 3 years after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| malignant transformation rate | malignant transformation case number/total case number | 3 years after surgery |
Inclusion Criteria:
-Medical records of patients who were diagnosed with multicystic ameloblastoma (MA) or unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) by routine pathology were collected from January 2010 to December 2017 in Ninth People's Hospital of Shanghai JiaoTong University Medical College.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Medical records of patients diagnosed as multicystic ameloblastoma (MA) or unicystic ameloblastoma (UA) by routine pathology were collected from January 2010 to December 2017 in Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University Medical College. Patients were divided into two groups based on the management regimen: fenestration decompression combined with secondary curettage (FDSC) group, and local curettage (LC) group. Patients were followed up for 3-8 years, using panoramic radiography to measure the change of the area of the cystic cavity involved in ameloblastoma and the recurrence or malignant transformation of the tumor in both groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|