The Impact of the Vasodilator, Sildenafil, on the Pulmonary Circulation During Exercise in Healthy Trained and Untrained Humans
The Impact of the Vasodilator, Sildenafil, on the Pulmonary Circulation During Exercise in Healthy Trained and Untrained Humans
There is emerging evidence suggesting that the pulmonary vasculature and right heart may play a role in the limitation of exercise capacity in healthy individuals. It is well established that aerobic training improves cardiovascular function. While the pulmonary system is integral to the function of the cardiopulmonary system, it has been traditionally accepted that lung function does not respond to exercise training. However, recent research suggests pulmonary vascular function adaptations may occur with aerobic training, and this may contribute to enhanced exercise tolerance. Research has highlighted that increased capillary blood volume (Vc) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are correlated with higher cardiorespiratory fitness at rest. Additionally, endurance trained participants have increased exercise DLCO concomitant to higher resting Vc when compared to untrained participants, and during exercise this difference seems to be driven by higher membrane diffusing capacity (Dm), independent of Vc or VA (alveolar volume). Of importance is also the evidence that highlights endurance trained participants having reduced pulmonary arterial pressures at rest and during exercise. Reduced pulmonary arterial pressure in endurance trained participants despite endurance trained participants consistently displaying increased diffusion capacity/pulmonary perfusion at rest and during exercise suggests a lower threshold pressure for pulmonary capillary recruitment. Together, this cross-sectional evidence suggests improvements in the pulmonary circulation due to exercise training in order to facilitate gas exchange. Whether this apparent improvement in pulmonary circulation is due to enhanced pulmonary vascular function via NO mediated vasodilation must be determined experimentally. If sildenafil administration improves DLCO, Vc, and Dm, this would provide evidence that the NO mediated vasodilatory pathway plays a role in the regulation of vascular tone, function, and perfusion across the pulmonary vasculature. Should a larger response to sildenafil be observed in untrained persons, this would suggest better baseline vascular function in trained participants compared to untrained. This would provide strong evidence that aerobic training improves pulmonary vasculature function which is contrary to the conventional understanding of aerobic training on the cardiopulmonary system.
Background
There is emerging evidence suggesting that the pulmonary vasculature and right heart may play a role in the limitation of exercise capacity in healthy individuals. It is well established that aerobic training improves cardiovascular function. While the pulmonary system is integral to the function of the cardiopulmonary system, it has been traditionally accepted that lung function does not respond to exercise training. However, recent research suggests pulmonary vascular function adaptations may occur with aerobic training, and this may contribute to enhanced exercise tolerance.
Research has highlighted that increased capillary blood volume (Vc) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) are correlated with higher cardiorespiratory fitness at rest. Additionally, endurance trained participants have increased exercise DLCO concomitant to higher resting Vc when compared to untrained participants, and during exercise this difference seems to be driven by higher membrane diffusing capacity (Dm), independent of Vc or VA (alveolar volume). Of importance is also the evidence that highlights endurance trained participants having reduced pulmonary arterial pressures at rest and during exercise. Reduced pulmonary arterial pressure in endurance trained participants despite endurance trained participants consistently displaying increased diffusion capacity/pulmonary perfusion at rest and during exercise suggests a lower threshold pressure for pulmonary capillary recruitment. Together, this cross-sectional evidence suggests improvements in the pulmonary circulation due to exercise training in order to facilitate gas exchange. Whether this apparent improvement in pulmonary circulation is due to enhanced pulmonary vascular function via NO mediated vasodilation must be determined experimentally. If sildenafil administration improves DLCO, Vc, and Dm, this would provide evidence that the NO mediated vasodilatory pathway plays a role in the regulation of vascular tone, function, and perfusion across the pulmonary vasculature. Should a larger response to sildenafil be observed in untrained persons, this would suggest better baseline vascular function in trained participants compared to untrained. This would provide strong evidence that aerobic training improves pulmonary vasculature function which is contrary to the conventional understanding of aerobic training on the cardiopulmonary system.
Some investigations on the pulmonary vasculature have been completed with the known pulmonary vasodilator, sildenafil. Sildenafil administration has been shown to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve exercise tolerance in normobaric hypoxic conditions in young healthy individuals. Further, one of these investigations determined sildenafil did not alter maximal oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) in normoxia in moderately fit participants; however, this study was likely underpowered to detect a response. While some sildenafil interventional work has been conducted, no study to date has determined the effect of sildenafil on DLCO, Vc, and Dm during exercise in untrained vs. trained participants. If sildenafil administration improves DLCO, Vc, and Dm, this would provide evidence that the NO mediated vasodilatory pathway plays a role in the regulation of vascular tone, function, and perfusion across the pulmonary vasculature. Should a larger response to sildenafil be observed in untrained persons, this would suggest better baseline vascular function in trained participants compared to untrained. This would provide strong evidence that aerobic training improves pulmonary vasculature function which is contrary to the conventional understanding of aerobic training on the cardiopulmonary system.
Purpose
To examine the effects of the pulmonary vasodilator sildenafil on DLCO, Vc, and Dm in trained and untrained participants at rest and during exercise.
Hypothesis
If sildenafil administration improves DLCO, Vc, and Dm, this would provide evidence that the NO mediated vasodilatory pathway plays a role in the regulation of vascular tone, function, and perfusion across the pulmonary vasculature. Should a larger response to sildenafil be observed in untrained persons, this would suggest better baseline vascular function in trained participants compared to untrained. This would provide strong evidence that aerobic training improves pulmonary vasculature function which is contrary to the conventional understanding of aerobic training on the cardiopulmonary system.
Research Design
Randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled cross-over design.
Trial Treatment
Treatment: Sildenafil (oral), 50 mg Placebo: Medical grade placebo pill
Duration
This randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over, cross-sectional study will include 6 sessions and will be a crossover design with participants acting as their own controls. All exercise protocols will be conducted on an electronically braked cycle ergometer and will begin with a standardized warm-up and end with a standardized cool-down.
Session 1) During session 1, participants will provide informed consent and health screening (PAR-Q+), be familiarized to the laboratory and experimental measurement protocols, conduct a pulmonary function test, and conduct an incremental maximal exercise test to determine V̇O2peak on the cycle ergometer. A small blood sample will be collected via finger prick to measure hemoglobin (to correct DLCO). Specific relative workloads will be calculated cardiorespiratory and power output data obtained from the V̇O2peak protocol conducted during session 1.
Session 2 and 3) During sessions 2 and 3, participants will ingest either a placebo or 50 mg sildenafil, then rest a minimum of 30 minutes. Testing will start with measurement of resting diffusion capacity, pulmonary capillary blood volume (Vc), and membrane diffusion capacity (Dm) using the multiple fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2)-DLCO technique, with the order of FIO2 administration randomized and the participant in supine position. Supine DLCO measurements are to determine maximal resting DLCO and to quantify the impact of postural change on participant DLCO. Next, participants will complete resting baseline DLCO measurements seated on the cycle ergometer, followed by an absolute workload protocol with the exercise intensity set at 60 Watts for a duration of ten minutes. A small blood sample will be collected via finger prick to measure hemoglobin (to correct DLCO). During the absolute workload protocol, measurements will occur after the 4th minute of exercise, in order to allow verification of measurement equipment operation during exercise and to give the participant sufficient time to warm-up and hit steady state. Steady state will be defined as minute-by-minute change in heart rate ≤ 5 bpm. A minimum of 9 and no more than 12 breath-holds will be performed during this session. The order of sessions 2 and 3 will be randomized and the participant and laboratory technicians will be blinded to the administration of the pharmacological intervention.
Session 4 and 5) During sessions 4 and 5, participants will ingest either a placebo or 50 mg sildenafil, rest a minimum of 30 minutes, and then complete exercise DLCO sessions. The exercise DLCO sessions will include exercise intensities set at 30%, 60%, and 90% of individual V̇O2peak with the order of FIO2 administration and workload randomized. A minimum of 9 and no more than 12 breath-holds will be performed during this session. DLCO measurements will be taken after participants have attained steady-state at each workload. A small blood sample will be collected via finger prick to measure hemoglobin (to correct DLCO). Participants will complete active recovery (<100W) between workloads to minimize fatigue and metabolite accumulation similar to previous work. The order of sessions 4 and 5 will be randomized and the participant and laboratory technicians will be blinded to the administration of the pharmacological intervention.
Session 6) During session 6, participants will undergo echocardiography measurements at rest and during exercise after taking placebo and sildenafil. The order of drug administration during this session will not be randomized. Resting echocardiography will be conducted during quiet seated rest and exercise will be conducted exercising at 60 Watts, both on the same cycle ergometer.
Session 1 is anticipated to take ~2 hours. Sessions 2 and 3 are anticipated to take ~1.5 hours. Sessions 4 and 5 are anticipated to take 2 hours. Session 6 is anticipated to take 2 hours. The anticipated total study duration is ~11 hours. All sessions will be planned within a 6-week timeframe.
Statistical Methods
Data will be analyzed using commercially available software. A priori α = 0.05. Diffusion capacity response will be analyzed by group mean analysis with a two-way repeated measures ANOVA with the groupings as HI-FIT and LO-FIT (key variables DLCO, Dm, Vc) across all exercise intensities, consistent with previous work with similar methods and primary outcomes. Post-hoc testing will be conducted via Holm-Sidak method. The same approach will be used to determine differences in key variables from echocardiography (e.g. PASP).
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: