Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Investigator left organization before study initiated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare an Enhanced Recovery Pathway to the current pre-operative/recovery practices of the endoscopy department on patient post-procedure outcomes.
Every 4th to 5th patient that checks in to the endoscopy department for their procedure will be screened for eligibility requirements. If eligible for the study, the patient will be informed about the study and potential risks. All patients giving written informed consent will be enrolled into the enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) [nursing managed ERP: goal-directed fluid management (Lactated Ringer's Solution at 5mL/kg/hr), PONV prophylaxis for an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room), and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure] for their procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prospective Experimental Group | Experimental | For the experimental group, we will recruit 200 participants who will receive the Enhanced Recovery Pathway, which will be ordered as a standing order set by the attending provider and managed by their peri-procedural nurses. The modified ERP for this study includes the following interventions: nursing managed order sets with ERP instructions to receive goal-directed fluid management within anesthesia approved parameters utilizing the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol for IV fluid administration, PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis, early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters, and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters. |
|
| Retrospective Control Group | No Intervention | The retrospective group will consist of 200 randomly selected medical records of patients who had colonoscopy procedures for a 6 month period prior to study implementation (between 10/1/2019 to 4/1/2020). The retrospective control group will have received the current standard of care including: IV fluids for management of intra-procedural hypotension as indicated/ordered by the physician, PO intake at 30-45 minutes, up to a chair at 60 minutes, and all procedure related complications will have been treated (e.g. PONV) per physician order as is the current standard of practice in the GI Lab recovery area. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ondansetron 4 MG | Drug | PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare recovery time stamps before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period. | We will compare mean recovery times between control and intervention groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA). | 1-2 hours |
| To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period. | We will perform a Chi-square analysis for presence or absence of nausea and/or vomiting in the recovery period (measured by: administration of anti-emetic, documentation on N/V flowchart, and/or documentation in nursing narrative note) between control and intervention groups. | 1-2 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To compare patient satisfaction scores before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period. | We will perform a t-test of patient satisfaction scores (Press Ganey scores) between control and intervention groups. | 15 minutes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Angela Maeder, PhD | Northwestern Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northwestern Memorial Hospital | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19517165 | Background | Alghanem SM, Massad IM, Rashed EM, Abu-Ali HM, Daradkeh SS. Optimization of anesthesia antiemetic measures versus combination therapy using dexamethasone or ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0567-3. Epub 2009 Jun 11. | |
| 24255744 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017294 | Ondansetron |
| D000077325 | Ringer's Lactate |
| D004434 | Early Ambulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Lactated Ringers, Intravenous | Drug | Goal directed IV fluids to be administered starting preop per the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol (LR @ 5mL/kg/hr). |
|
|
| Early Mobilization | Other | Patient transferred up to the chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters and patient safety. |
|
| Early PO Intake | Other | Patient will be offered PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters and patient safety. |
|
| Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov 16;5(11):527-33. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.527. |
| 29977464 | Background | Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R, Chan E, Kim MP. The Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs and Their Application in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-2-77. |
| 15190136 | Background | Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196. |
| 20679780 | Background | Ellett ML. Review of propofol and auxiliary medications used for sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;33(4):284-95; quiz 296-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3181eac371. |
| 12006853 | Background | Crenshaw JT, Winslow EH. Preoperative fasting: old habits die hard. Am J Nurs. 2002 May;102(5):36-44; quiz 45. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200205000-00033. |
| 11886298 | Background | Gan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting--can it be eliminated? JAMA. 2002 Mar 13;287(10):1233-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.10.1233. No abstract available. |
| 30594252 | Background | Joliat GR, Ljungqvist O, Wasylak T, Peters O, Demartines N. Beyond surgery: clinical and economic impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3824-0. |
| 17697197 | Background | Lichtenstein GR, Cohen LB, Uribarri J. Review article: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy--the importance of adequate hydration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):633-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03406.x. |
| 28097305 | Background | Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. |
| 26650497 | Background | Saraghi M. Intraoperative Fluids and Fluid Management for Ambulatory Dental Sedation and General Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2015 Winter;62(4):168-76; quiz 177. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.4.168. |
| 27746521 | Background | Shaikh SI, Nagarekha D, Hegade G, Marutheesh M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: A simple yet complex problem. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):388-396. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.179310. |
| 27870735 | Background | Som A, Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Arora MK, Baidya DK. Combination of 5-HT3 Antagonist and Dexamethasone Is Superior to 5-HT3 Antagonist Alone for PONV Prophylaxis After Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1418-1426. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001617. |
| 24916073 | Background | Weinberg L, Faulkner M, Tan CO, Liu DH, Tay S, Nikfarjam M, Peyton P, Story D. Fluid prescription practices of anesthesiologists managing patients undergoing elective colonoscopy: an observational study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 10;7:356. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-356. |
| D002227 |
| Carbazoles |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006575 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring |
| D000077324 | Crystalloid Solutions |
| D007552 | Isotonic Solutions |
| D012996 | Solutions |
| D004364 | Pharmaceutical Preparations |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |