Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is commonly used in operating room (cardiac surgery), as well as in other critical care settings. A recent meta-analysis including only three randomized studies demonstrated that the use of a videolaryngoscope for transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion in anesthetized patients undergoing open cardiac surgery was associated with a significant reduction in the number of attempts. insertion and complications rate, compared with blind insertion or a laryngoscope-assisted insertion.
ICU patients are usually intubated, with multiple complications, requiring high doses of catecholamines, and with frequent coagulation disorders. Many of these patients, during their stay in the ICU, require a transesophageal echocardiogram. On multiple occasions, due to the critical situation of the patients, due to edema, and coagulation alteration, the placement of the echocardiography probe can be difficult, leading to complications, such as gastric bleeding or lesions in the oropharyngeal mucosa.
To avoid complications during the insertion of the TEE tube, the investigators consider it necessary to introduce it in the fewest possible attempts.
The primary aim of the present study was to compare the success rate of TEE probe insertion at the first attempt betweenn the C-MAC videolaryngoscope assisted insertion and the blind insertion technique.
The secondary aim was to compared differences between the 2 groups in the incidence of complications ( oropharyngeal mucosal injury, hematoma, ….), overall success rate, the number of insertion attempts, and the duration of insertions.
One hundred intubated ICU adult patients that require transesophageal echocardiography insertion, will be randomized by means of a computer-generated randomization order into two groups: Conventional group (Group Blind), and videolaryngoscope group (group C-MAC).
Success rate of the selected technique (first attempt), overall success rate, number of attempts, complications, and duration of insertion for technique will be noted.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional blind insertion technique. | Active Comparator | Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted using a conventional blind insertion technique. |
|
| C-MAC videolaryngoscope insertion technique | Experimental | Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted using a C-MAC videolaryngoscope insertion technique to advance into esophagus under direct vision. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blind insertion technique | Device | Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted using a conventional blind insertion technique. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage) | To compare the difference in the first attempt (percentage) of different techniques for insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe. | Participants will be followed from the beginning of the transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion through the mouth to the confirmation of successful insertion (10 minutes or three attempts) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in the overall success rate (percentage) | To compare the difference overall success rate (percentage) of different techniques for insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe. | Participants will be followed from the beginning of the transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion through the mouth to the confirmation of successful insertion (10 minutes or three attempts) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Manuel Taboada | University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuel Taboada | Santiago de Compostela | La Coruña | 15701 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26575010 | Background | Ishida T, Kiuchi C, Sekiguchi T, Tsujimoto T, Kawamata M. McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope for insertion of a transoesophageal echocardiography probe: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Apr;33(4):263-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000367. | |
| 27498268 | Background | Kavrut Ozturk N, Kavakli AS. Use of McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscope to Assist Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Insertion in Intubated Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):191-196. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.150. Epub 2016 Mar 31. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data types: Deidentified participant data How to access data: Requests must be sent to manutabo@yahoo.es When available: With publication Additional Information Who can access the data: Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved T ypes of analyses: For scientific purpose Mechanisms of data availability: With investigator support
When available: With publication
Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved Types of analyses: For scientific purpose
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
After TEE insertion, the pharyngeal mucosa will be evaluated with de C-MAC videolaryngoscope by an anesthesiologist who were blinded to the study
| C-MAC videolaryngoscope insertion technique | Device | Transesophageal echocardiography probe will be inserted using a C-MAC videolaryngoscope insertion technique |
|
| Difference in the incidence of complications (percentage) | To compare the difference in complications of different techniques for insertion of transesophageal echocardiography probe. | Participants will be followed from the beginning of the transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion through the mouth to the confirmation of successful insertion (10 minutes or three attempts) and in the next 24 hours. |
| Difference in the duration of insertion | To compare the duration of different techniques for insertion of intransesophageal echocardiography probe. | Participants will be followed from the beginning of the transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion through the mouth to the confirmation of successful insertion (10 minutes or three attempts) and in the next 24 hour and in the next 24 hours. |
| 33430768 | Background | Kumamoto T, Tashima K, Hiraoka C, Ikuta Y, Yamamoto T. McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope assistance during transesophageal echocardiography may reduce the risk of complications: a manikin study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 11;21(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01231-3. |
| 25543216 | Background | Kim MK, Park SW, Sim Y, Lee JW. Use of a McGrath Videolaryngoscope to assist transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion in anesthetized patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Apr;29(2):e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Dec 24. No abstract available. |
| 38278357 | Derived | Taboada M, Carinena A, Estany-Gestal A, Iglesias-Alvarez D, Veiras S, Martinez A, Eiras M, De Miguel M, Selas S, Martinez-Monzonis A, Pereira P, Bastos-Fernandez M, Gonzalez-Salvado V, Alvarez-Barrado M, Ferreiroa E, Caruezo V, Costa J, Naveira A, Otero P, Adrio B, Martinez-Cereijo JM, Fernandez A, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Alvarez J, Seoane-Pillado T. Videolaryngoscope versus conventional technique for insertion of a transesophageal echocardiography probe in intubated ICU patients (VIDLARECO trial): A randomized clinical trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Apr;43(2):101346. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101346. Epub 2024 Jan 24. |