Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Distraction is a non-pharmacological technique that moves focus away from anxiety, discomfort or unpleasant stimulation to more stimulating or friendly stimulation. Distraction is one of the most effective, simplest and inexpensive non-pharmacological pain management methods (Hockenberry & Wilson, 2018). The benefits of using non-pharmacological methods include decreased pain, distress, and fear reported by the parent, child, and/or observer (Wente, 2013). There are two main types of distraction techniques: active and passive (Mutlu & Balcı, 2015; Wohlheiter & Dahlquist, 2013).
Objectives:
To evaluate the roles of the TICK-B, listening music, and watching cartoon, in relieving pain and fear of school-age children during PIVC.
To compare the effect of TICK-B with the effects of the listening music, and watching cartoon, on reducing pain and fear during PIVC in children.
To compare the effects of three distraction groups with the control group in relieving pain and fear during PIVC.
Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC) is an invasive technique. In this technique, a catheter is entrenched through the skin of the recipient into the lumen of a peripheral blood vein. It is the second most painful procedure performed in hospitals. Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PICV) is a common painful procedure for children, and nearly all ill children have experience with PIVC, and up to 80% of patients receive a peripheral venous cannula in a hospital. Therefore, the use of effective methods in pain and anxiety relief is very important during injection procedures in children.
In order to relieve pain and fear in children undergoing PICV. Psychological and physical approaches for coping with children's pain are favored, as well as pharmacological methods. Application of topical anesthetic creams is the most commonly used pharmacological solution to reduce pain associated with the medical procedure, or refrigerant preparations, however, only reduce the perception of pain in children during procedures. These approaches are not resolved anxiety, a core factor of noncooperation, which encumbers the efficiency of the needle procedure. For this cause, non-pharmacological approaches are generally recognized as alternative techniques, which may be used separately or in addition to pharmacological approaches, to provide sufficient pain and fear relief and to offer children a sense of control over the situation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TICK-B group as intervention group | Experimental | TICK-B group: The children will receive the pictures they want. They will be asked to trace and color the pictures that need coloring. The nurse will color with children during the procedure. And after the procedure, the child will take his or her picture which he colored during the procedure. |
|
| Watching cartoons | Experimental | Watching cartoons: In this group, children will watch cartoons as they like. Watching will continue until the procedure is complete. |
|
| Group listening to music | Experimental | Listening to music: In this group, children will listen to cartoon music as they like. Listen will continue until the procedure is complete. |
|
| Standard care provided group as control group | No Intervention | Control group. The kids in this group will be allowed to keep their family near. The routine blood taking |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TICK-B group | Other | These interventions will use as distraction techniques. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Faces Pain Scale-Revised to rate the severity of Pain (0-10) from no pain to worst pain | To assess the intensity of pain related to Peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure in children: Children will self-report their pain severity using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 5 minutes before procedure done. |
| Children's Fear Scale (CFS): Fear (0-4) no anxiety to extreme anxiety | To assess the fear level of the children related to Peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure: Children will self-report their level of fear using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS), which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 5 minutes before procedure done |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Faces Pain Scale-Revised to rate the severity of Pain (0-10) from no pain to worst pain. | To assess the intensity of pain related to Peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure in children: Children will self-report their pain severity using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 0 minute during peripheral cannulation insertion procedure(time during insertion of cannula). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Analog Scale (VAS), to measure the pain and Fear of children by the parents and observer. | Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will be used to measure pain and fear of children by parent and observer. | Immediately after cannualtion (1-2 minutes after procedure to mask observer) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Hockenberry, M. J., & Wilson, D. (2018). Wong's nursing care of infants and children-E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. | ||
| 23199786 | Background | Wente SJ. Nonpharmacologic pediatric pain management in emergency departments: a systematic review of the literature. J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Mar;39(2):140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.09.011. Epub 2012 Nov 28. | |
| 25817062 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D035061 | Control Groups |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015340 | Epidemiologic Research Design |
| D004812 | Epidemiologic Methods |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D012107 | Research Design |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Faces Pain Scale-Revised to rate the severity of Pain (0-10) from no pain to worst pain. | To assess the intensity of pain related to peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure in children: Children will self-report their pain severity using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised, which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 1-2 minutes after procedure done. |
| Children's Fear Scale (CFS): Fear (0-4) no anxiety to extreme anxiety | To assess the fear level of the children related to peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure: -Children will self-report their level of fear using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS), which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 0 minute during cannulation procedure. |
| Children's Fear Scale (CFS): Fear (0-4) no anxiety to extreme anxiety | To assess the fear level of the children related to peripheral intravenous cannulation procedure: -Children will self-report their level of fear using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS), which has been validated and shown to be reliable. | 1-2 minute after cannulation procedure done. |
| Background |
| Mutlu B, Balci S. Effects of balloon inflation and cough trick methods on easing pain in children during the drawing of venous blood samples: a randomized controlled trial. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jul;20(3):178-86. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12112. Epub 2015 Mar 28. |
| 22089042 | Background | Hendry F, Checketts MR, McLeod GA. Effect of intradermal anaesthesia on success rate and pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomized non-blind crossover study. Scott Med J. 2011 Nov;56(4):210-3. doi: 10.1258/smj.2011.011160. |
| 14963868 | Background | Rogers TL, Ostrow CL. The use of EMLA cream to decrease venipuncture pain in children. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004 Feb;19(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2003.09.005. |
| 16330518 | Background | Blount RL, Piira T, Cohen LL, Cheng PS. Pediatric procedural pain. Behav Modif. 2006 Jan;30(1):24-49. doi: 10.1177/0145445505282438. |
| 30324169 | Background | Friedrichsdorf SJ, Eull D, Weidner C, Postier A. A hospital-wide initiative to eliminate or reduce needle pain in children using lean methodology. Pain Rep. 2018 Sep 11;3(Suppl 1):e671. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000671. eCollection 2018 Sep. |
| 26136310 | Background | Shomaker K, Dutton S, Mark M. Pain Prevalence and Treatment Patterns in a US Children's Hospital. Hosp Pediatr. 2015 Jul;5(7):363-70. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2014-0195. |
| 18387963 | Background | Uman LS, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Kisely S. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials examining psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents: an abbreviated cochrane review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Sep;33(8):842-54. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn031. Epub 2008 Apr 2. |
| D008722 | Methods |