Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to test and compare the effectiveness of three priming interventions on consumers' selection of sustainable foods: priming with environmental benefits, health benefits and co-benefits (environment and health benefits).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control message group | No Intervention | Participants will not receive the priming manipulation. | |
| Health benefits priming group | Experimental | Participants will be cueing with health benefits by asking to do a word-search exercise beginning with: "In the following, please choose words/statements that can indicate that having a healthy and sustainable diet can have health benefits, such as..." |
|
| Environmental benefits priming group | Experimental | Participants will be cueing with environmental benefits by asking to do a word-search exercise beginning with: "In the following, please choose words/statements that can indicate that having a healthy and sustainable diet can have environmental benefits, such as..." |
|
| Environmental and health co-benefits priming group | Experimental | Participants will be cueing with environmental and health co-benefits by asking to do a word-search exercise beginning with: "In the following, please choose words/statements that can indicate that having a healthy and sustainable diet can have both benefits for health and the environment, such as..." |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priming intervention | Behavioral | The priming manipulation will be embedded in one discrete choice experiment to test the effect of three priming interventions: priming with health benefits, environment benefits, and co-benefits of having sustainable diets, respectively, on consumers' preference for sustainable foods, and the relative importance of proximal attributes (e.g. taste and price) and distant attributes (e.g., attributes related to environmental sustainability) in determining food choice preference, as well as testing whether the effects of these three priming interventions can be modified by consumers' social orientation values. The cueing manipulation will be achieved by asking participants to complete a word-search exercise. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Consumers' preference for choosing sustainable foods measured by Discrete Choice Experiment |
| Within 1 day of randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure participants' social orientation value using Social Orientation Value Scale |
| Within 1 day of randomization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKU School of Public Health | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Data will be shared upon reasonable request from PI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|