Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Mindpax s.r.o., Czech Republic | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the AKTIBIPO VALIDATION study is to evaluate the effect of the Mindpax monitoring and microeducation system in patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Up to 130 participants (BD patients) who participated previously in the observational AKTIBIPO study, as well as new patients (DeNovo) will be enrolled for a follow-up period of 12 months. All participants will wear the wrist actigraphy device and use the Mindpax mobile application on their mobile phone. Through the application, the patients will fill in the weekly mood self assessment questionnaire (ASERT) and receive evidence-based health microeducations aimed at understanding the bipolar disorder and associated risk factors. Apart from general psychoeducation, the participants will receive additional individualized targeted health microeducation when the system detects deviation from individual patterns of mood, activity and sleep. The outcomes will evaluate the subjective and objective impact of system usage on self-reported and clinical outcomes.
Study procedure
Up to 130 participants (BD patients) who participated previously in the observational AKTIBIPO study and patients with no history of using the Mindpax system (DeNovo) will be enrolled for a follow-up period of 12 months (+ 3 additional months for DeNovo patients). All participants will wear the wrist actigraphy device (Mindpax) at all times and use the Mindpax mobile application. At enrollment and study completion, the participants will sign the informed consent and undergo evaluation using the MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale) and YMRS (Young mania rating scale) scales.
Collected data
At baseline, i.e. at enrollment to the digital programme (M0) and every three months (M3,M6,M9,M12), the participants will fill in a series of self-assessment questionnaires: the Q-les-Q (the Quality of life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire), HLS-CZ-12 (Health literacy survey), WHODAS 2.0 CZ (the WHO disability assessment schedule), BMQ-CZ (Beliefs about medicines questionnaire) and MARS-CZ (the Medication adherence report scale). The patients will also be evaluated using the CGI-S (Clinical global impression, M0-M12). The psychosocial and clinical events (hospitalizations, relapses), current medication and illness history will be collected throughout the study (M0-M12).
The DeNovo patients with no history of using the Mindpax application will complete additional 3 months of actigraphy and self-assessment monitoring with no intervention and limited feedback (mirror period), prior to visit M0. At entering this observational period, the same set of aforementioned instruments will be collected (visit M-3).
Study endpoints
The primary endpoint is the change in Q-les-Q score at M12, compared to M0. Secondary endpoints include: i) higher health status (lower number of hospitalization days, compared to the same amount of time in the preceding AKTIBIPO study or mirror period for DeNovo patients), ii) lower subjectively rated symptom level (compared to the same amount of time in the preceding AKTIBIPO study or mirror period), iii) higher rate of health literacy at M12, compared to M0, and iv) Higher treatment adherence and better understanding to medication at M12, compared to M0.
Microeducation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | All participants will use the Mindpax mobile application, wear the wrist accelerometer and fill in weekly self-assessments. All participants will obtain weekly health tips (general psychoeducation) and additional individualized targeted tips when the system detects deviation from individual mood, activity and sleep patterns. Participants, who did not participate in the previous AKTIBIPO study (DeNovo) will complete additional 3 months of actigraphy and self-evaluation monitoring with research version of the Mindpax application, providing limited feedback and no health tips. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindpax monitoring system | Device | All participants will use the Mindpax mobile application, wear the wrist accelerometer and fill in weekly self-assessments. All participants will obtain weekly health tips (general psychoeducation) and additional individualized targeted tips when the system detects deviation from individual mood, activity and sleep patterns, during the active 12 months of followup. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in quality of life (Q-LES-Q) at 12 months | Change from baseline in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire at final visit 12 months from enrolment. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in quality of life (Q-LES-Q) at 6 months | Change from baseline in the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire 6 months from enrolment. | 6 months |
| Change in level of disability (WHODAS) at 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health | Klecany | 250 67 | Czechia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants previously followed in the AKTIBIPO study and newly admitted participants (DeNovo) are included. Participants are followed over 12 months in the programme, collecting primary outcome every 3 months. Some long-term secondary outcomes are compared to values from the equivalent amount of time in the preceding AKTIBIPO study. The newly admitted DeNovo participants are followed for additional 3 months prior to starting the digital programme to collect outcome data from a non-interventional comparison period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Change from baseline in the WHO Disability Assesment Schedule 2.0 at final visit 12 months from enrolment.
| 12 months |
| Change in level of disability (WHODAS) at 6 months | Change from baseline in the WHO Disability Assesment Schedule 2.0 at 6 months from enrolment. | 6 months |
| Lower number of hospitalization days during 12 months o of followup, compared to a preceding study | The number of hospitalization days during the 12 months follow-up in the study as reported by the patient/caring psychiatrist, compared to the mirror period. The mirror period is defined as the last time window of the preceding AKTIBIPO study which fulfilled the data completeness criteria (i.e. at least 50% valid actigraphy days and at least 50% completed weekly ASERT questionnaires) and has equal length to the followup in the AKTIBIPO-VALIDATION study. If the participant exists the study prematurely, the last period of equal length of the AKTIBIPO study, fulfilling the criteria, will be used. | up to 12 months, mirror design |
| Lower number of hospitalization days during first 6 months of followup, compared to a preceding study | The number of hospitalization days during the first 6 months follow-up in the study as reported by the patient/caring psychiatrist, compared to the mirror period. The mirror period is defined as the last time window of the preceding AKTIBIPO study which fulfilled the data completeness criteria (i.e. at least 50% valid actigraphy days and at least 50% completed weekly ASERT questionnaires) and has equal length to the followup in the AKTIBIPO-VALIDATION study. If the participant exists the study prematurely, the last period of equal length of the AKTIBIPO study, fulfilling the criteria, will be used. | 6 months, mirror design |
| Lower mean value of the subjectively rated symptom level using the Aktibipo SElf-RaTing (ASERT) questionnaire at 12 months | Difference of the mean value of the total score of the subjectively rated symptom level using the Aktibipo SElf-RaTing (ASERT) questionnaire (Anýž. J., 2021) during the 12 months of followup compared to the mirror period The mirror period is defined as the last time window of the preceding AKTIBIPO study which fulfilled the data completeness criteria (i.e. at least 50% valid actigraphy days and at least 50% completed weekly ASERT questionnaires) and has equal length to the followup in the AKTIBIPO-VALIDATION study. If the participant exists the study prematurely, the last period of equal length of the AKTIBIPO study, fulfilling the criteria, will be used. | up to 12 months, mirror design |
| Lower mean value of the subjectively rated symptom level using the Aktibipo SElf-RaTing (ASERT) questionnaire at 6 months | Difference of the mean value of the total score of the subjectively rated symptom level using the Aktibipo SElf-RaTing (ASERT) questionnaire (Anýž. J., 2021) during the first 6 months of followup compared to the mirror period The mirror period is defined as the last time window of the preceding AKTIBIPO study which fulfilled the data completeness criteria (i.e. at least 50% valid actigraphy days and at least 50% completed weekly ASERT questionnaires) and has equal length to the followup in the AKTIBIPO-VALIDATION study. If the participant exists the study prematurely, the last period of equal length of the AKTIBIPO study, fulfilling the criteria, will be used. | 6 months, mirror design |
| Higher rate of health literacy (HLS-12-CZ) at 12 months | Higher value of the as measured by the Health literacy survey HLS-12-CZ questionnaire at 12 months, compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Higher rate of health literacy (HLS-12-CZ) at 6 months | Higher value of the as measured by the Health literacy survey HLS-12-CZ questionnaire at 6 months, compared to baseline. | 6 months |
| Higher value of medication adherence report scale (MARS) at 12 months | The difference in the total score of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) at 12 months of followup, compared to baseline | 12 months |
| Higher value of medication adherence report scale (MARS) at 6 months | The difference in the total score of the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) at 12 months of followup, compared to baseline | 6 months |
| Higher rate of beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) at 12 months | The difference of the total score of the Beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ-CZ) at 12 months, compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Higher score of beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ) at 6 months | The difference of the total score of the Beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ-CZ) at 6 months, compared to baseline. | 6 months |