Does LISA Change the Time of Device Positioning Compared to INSURE in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants With RDS? A Crossover Randomized Controlled Manikin Trial
Does LISA Change the Time of Device Positioning Compared to INSURE in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants With RDS? A Crossover Randomized Controlled Manikin Trial
This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.
Background: Although LISA offers some advantages in ventilation procedure and neonatal outcomes over INSURE, the use of a catheter during LISA may have some drawbacks such as the prolonged duration of the laryngoscopy needed to insert the device. This is likely to aggravate the invasiveness of the procedure, resulting in stressful consequences such as bradycardia, hypoxia and hemodynamic changes.
Objectives: i) time of device positioning, ii) success of the procedure of positioning the device, iii) participant's satisfaction.
Methods: This is an unblinded, randomized, controlled, crossover (AB/BA) trial of surfactant treatment with LISA vs. INSURE in a manikin simulating an extremely low birth weight infant. Participants will be level III NICU consultants and residents. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated random assignment list. The primary outcome measure will be the total time of device positioning. The secondary outcomes will be the success of the first and the participant's satisfaction.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: