Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background
Pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures are common and one of the most frequent reasons for orthopedic care. Fractures in need of surgery are often treated with metal Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails (ESIN). Nail removal after 6-12 months is generally advocated. Surgical hardware removal has few complications; however, it is a substantial burden on the child, the family and healthcare economy. Bioabsorbable Intramedullary Nails (BIN) have been developed for the same indications as metal ESIN. The use of bioabsorbable implants would deem hardware removal unnecessary and relieve the child of further surgery and reduce healthcare costs.
Methods
The investigators aim to recruit all children in the catchment area of Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital (Copenhagen, Denmark) with acute unstable diaphyseal forearm fractures. Participants will be operated with BIN and followed consecutively for 2 years with interim analysis of data after 6 months. The investigators will report radiological healing using the Radiographic Union Score (RUS) 3 months after surgery together with any adverse events during follow-up.
Discussion
This study will provide important preliminary data and asses the feasibility of using the bioabsorbable Activa IM-Nailâ„¢ in pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures. This study is a pilot study for initiating an RCT comparing BIN to metal ESIN hypothesizing that BIN is not an inferior treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activa IM-Nail | Experimental | Activa IM-Nail |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Activa IM-Nail | Device | PLGA bioabsorbable intramedullary nail |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Union Score (RUS) | RUS is a score derived from assessing AP and lateral radiographs. Each bone cortex (anterior, posterior, medial and lateral) is assigned a score of 1 to 3. A cortex with a visible fracture line and no callus is given a score of 1, a cortex with callus but a visible fracture line is scored as 2 and a cortex with bridging callus and no visible fracture line is scored as 3. Scores are added to give a minimum score of 4 (definitely not healed) and a maximum of 12 (definitely healed). 12 is best. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R) | To measure the outcome of pain in children below 8 years of age. Pain evaluated by the child selecting 1 of 6 faces that represents their feeling of pain. Faces are scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 or 10. Scale 0-10 with 2 point increments. 0 = no pain, 10= very much pain. 0 is best. | 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
We exclude patients
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morten J Andersen, MD | Contact | 004538681479 | mortenjonandersen@gmail.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Morten J Andersen, MD | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital | Recruiting | Herlev | Capital Region | 2730 | Denmark |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 24, 2021 | Jun 2, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Cohort study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Bilateral elbow and forearm range of motion |
Measured in degrees by goniometer |
| 3 months |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Pain evaluated by the child putting a mark on a 10 cm long line. Most left=no pain, most right=worst possible pain. Distance from most left to the child's mark is measured with a ruler. 1 mm = 1 point. Value is given with 1 decimal, e.g. 64 mm = 6,4 points. Scale 0.0-10.0. With 0 = no pain, 10= worst possible pain. 0 is best. | 3 months |