Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01AG073152 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Aging (NIA) | NIH |
| Roybal Predoctoral pilot grant | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Studies have determined that compared to cognitively intact older adults (CIOA), older adults with mild cognitive impairment (OAwMCI) exhibit more pronounced balance and gait impairments which lead to an increased risk of falls and mobility decline. Such impairments are evident during dual-tasking (i.e., simultaneous performance of cognitive and motor task) and OAwMCI have demonstrated an increased cognitive-motor interference (deteriorated performance of either or both cognitive/motor task). Furthermore, our preliminary laboratory findings indicate that compared to CIOA, OAwMCI in response to large-magnitude treadmill perturbations exhibits poor reactive responses (first line of defense against balance loss) and are unable to modulate their responses as the magnitude of perturbation increases. Despite that conventional exercise methods offer beneficial effects; they comprise of self-initiated task-specific exercises and may not focus on training reactive responses. Additionally, due to the presence of subtle balance and gait deficits, clinical measures used may not be sensitive enough to determine the risk of fall post-training. Furthermore, these training methods incorporate multiple sessions due to which adherence to exercise training is difficult with only a fraction of the older adults benefiting from it. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate a task-specific strategy that promotes factors associated with falling like balance control, muscular responses, coordination of limbs, and cognition through which OAwMCI may acquire maximum benefits to prevent a balance loss. One feasible method, which harnesses technology that can be used to deliver balance disturbances either while standing or walking in a consistent and controlled manner, is via a custom-based motorized treadmill. The scientific rigor from preliminary studies has reported a successful reduction of falls through a single session exposing CIOA to multiple treadmill-induced perturbations during gait and has shown significant improvement in reactive responses. For that reason, this stage 1 pilot study will examine the feasibility, applicability, and tolerability of a combined cognitive, and perturbation training on biomechanical determinants associated with falls and promote physical activity: kinematic variables, muscular responses, and cognitive function.
Given the cognitive decline and poor reactive responses among OAwMCI, it is essential to incorporate a strategy to enhance cognition and motor performance for promoting healthy aging. For this reason, we propose this study that aims to determine the feasibility, applicability and tolerability of a dual-task perturbation training paradigm in OAwMCI. This involves a treadmill induced perturbation training while concurrently performing a cognitive task with an aim to improve effective compensatory stepping strategies to prevent balance loss. Further, while testing on laboratory induced perturbations may provide an insight into understanding kinematic variables, evaluating the change on performance-based outcome measure may be clinically useful. The overall aim of this proposal to examine the central mechanisms of reactive balance control and perturbation-training adaptation to improve fall-resisting skills in healthy older adults and people with MCI using the following set of aims. Aim 1: To examine biomechanical and neuromuscular differences during reactive balance control against mechanical perturbations during stance and gait between OAwMCI and CIOA. Compared to CIOA, OAwMCI will show: H1.1. greater falls due to impaired biomechanical (delayed step initiation, lower reactive stability and greater limb support descent) and neuromuscular responses (longer postural response latencies and fewer muscle synergies with different structural activation) on novel stance and gait perturbations, which will worsen with dual task performance; H1.2. reduced modulation (scaling) of biomechanical and neuromuscular responses with increasing perturbation intensity; H1.3. slower rate of adaptation in stability control and muscle synergy adjustment with repeated perturbation exposure.
Aim 2: To relate impairments observed during reactive balance control in perturbed stance and gait with structural brain integrity, cognition and falls in OAwMCI. These older adults will display H2.1: Lower gray matter volume in fronto-pareital cortex and brainstem, and lower white matter integrity in sensorimotor pathways which will significantly correlate with poor performance on reactive stepping response; H2.2: Lower scores on neuropsychological battery test and NIH cognitive toolbox examining domains of executive function (attention, cognitive flexibility and response inhibition), visuo-spatial awareness, episodic memory which will correlate with deteriorated reactive stepping response. H2.3: Fall-Index computed from measures of reactive stability and limb support that are obtained from perturbation-based reactive measures will better discriminate prospective laboratory induced and real-life falls than conventional instrumented (postural sway and limits of stability) and performance-based clinical measures of balance and mobility, with increased predictive accuracy of Fall-Index under dual-task conditions.
Aim 2: To determine if deficits in reactive balance responses contribute to increased falls in OAwMCI during static and dynamic tasks than CIOA especially under dual-tasking. H2.1: Measures of reactive stability and limb support under dual-task conditions during perturbed gait will best discriminate retrospective and laboratory induced falls in this population. H2.2 Predictive accuracy of Fall-Index which will be greater than of clinical measures of balance and mobility.
Aim 3: To examine the feasibility and potential effectiveness of novel 6-week perturbation-based cognitive-motor intervention for improving fall-resisting skills during perturbed stance and gait. H3.1: Post-training OAwMCI will improve stability control, cognition and reduced laboratory falls, especially under dual-task conditions. H3.2: Baseline cognition and structural brain integrity/connectivity will predict change in stability control and fall-risk. H3.3. Improvements in stability control, cognition and falls reduction will be retained for at least 3 months post withdrawal of intervention resulting in improved community ambulation and reduced fear of falling and perceived cognitive load on activities of daily living
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single session dual task perturbation training-OAwMCI | Experimental | Participants will receive single session training of dual task. Six cognitive games that target working memory, executive functioning, visuomotor reactions, and language fluency will be provided in standing to get themselves familiarized. Following the cognitive tasks, participants will receive 12 slips without performing cognitive task (Single task training) at the highest intensity. Subsequently, 12 slips during standing while performing a cognitive task (dual task) will be administered. Similarly, they will then undergo 12 dual task walking trials (at self-selected speed) followed by 12 walking slips. |
|
| Multiple session dual task perturbation training-OAwMCI | Experimental | All participants will undergo stance and walking perturbation training for 4 weeks. Six cognitive games that target working memory, executive functioning, visuomotor reactions, and language fluency will be provided in standing to get themselves familiarized. Following the cognitive tasks, participants will receive 12 slips without performing cognitive task (Single task training) at the highest intensity. Subsequently, 12 slips during standing while performing a cognitive task (dual task) will be administered. Similarly, they will then undergo 12 dual task walking trials (at self-selected speed) followed by 12 walking slips. |
|
| Single session dual task perturbation training-CIOA | Active Comparator | All participants will receive only one training session of dual task. Six cognitive games that target working memory, executive functioning, visuomotor reactions, and language fluency will be provided in standing to get themselves familiarized. Following the cognitive tasks, participants will receive 12 slips without performing cognitive task (Single task training) at the highest intensity. Subsequently, 12 slips during standing while performing a cognitive task (dual task) will be administered. Similarly, they will then undergo 12 dual task walking trials (at self-selected speed) followed by 12 walking slips. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dual task perturbation training | Behavioral | Participants will play six cognitive games targeting working memory, executive functioning, visuomotor reactions, and language fluency provided in standing. Following which they will receive 12 slips without performing cognitive task (Single task training) at the highest intensity and 12 slips during standing while performing a cognitive task (dual task). Also, they will then undergo 12 dual task walking trials (at self-selected speed) followed by 12 walking slips. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Stability gain or loss | Stability is defined by both the position of a person's center-of-mass (COM) with respect to his or her base-of-support (BOS) and it's velocity. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in Limb support gain or loss | The inability to provide timely limb support due to insufficient amount of upward impulse generated from the ground reactive force can cause limb collapse, as characterized by the quotient of amount and rate of hip descent (Vhip/Zhip) measured from hip height and lead to an eventual fall. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in laboratory-induced falls | Perturbation is induced successfully and safely to reproduce inadvertent falls in a protective laboratory environment. Falls will be measured by the amount of body weight supported by the full-body harness system and measured by a load cell attached to this system. Instability of the body's COM and poor limb support prior to touchdown of the recovery step account for 90~100% of subsequent falls (occurring ~500ms later) in both sit-to-stand-slip and in gait-slip, in the laboratory settings. Intervention consists of repeated perturbation training to induce a change in the laboratory induced falls immediately post-training and examine it's retention after the initial training session. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in postural stability during reactive balance control (single and dual-task) on treadmill slips | Reactive balance control will be examined via the stance perturbation test under single and dual-task conditions (simultaneous performance of Letter number sequencing task or auditory stroop task). Postural stability can be defined as simultaneous control of center of mass (COM) position and velocity during slip-like or trip like perturbation relative to the rear edge of base of support (rear heel). The position is normalized with the individual's foot length, and velocity by square root of gravitational acceleration and individual's body height. Larger values indicate greater stability. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived task load | NASA TLX visual analog scale will be used to determine the perceived task load after every trial is completed. Higher scores indicates poor performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanvi S Bhatt | Contact | 312-355-4443 | tbhatt6@uic.edu | |
| Lakshmi Kannan | Contact | 312-413-3175 | lkanna2@uic.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tanvi Bhatt | University of Illinois at Chicago | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Illinois at Chicago | Recruiting | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| D000073496 | Frailty |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in postural stability during reactive balance control (single and dual-task) on overground slips | Reactive balance control will be examined via the stance perturbation test under single and dual-task conditions (simultaneous performance of Letter number sequencing task or auditory stroop task). Postural stability can be defined as simultaneous control of center of mass (COM) position and velocity during slip-like or trip like perturbation relative to the rear edge of base of support (rear heel). The position is normalized with the individual's foot length, and velocity by square root of gravitational acceleration and individual's body height. Larger values indicate greater stability. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in walking step length | Step length will be determined during single and dual-task walking performance via the walking on the treadmill and the GaitRite mat. Higher values for step length indicate better performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in walking cadence | Cadence will be determined during single and dual-task walking performance via the walking on the treadmill and the GaitRite mat. Lower cadence indicate better performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in walking stride length | Stride length will be determined during single and dual-task walking performance via the walking on the treadmill and the GaitRite mat. Higher values for stride length indicate better performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change of accuracy in letter number sequencing | This is an oral trail making test which includes listing alternate letter and number from the cue given in sequence. This test will be performed under single and dual-task conditions. Higher scores indicate better performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in accuracy of Visual clock test | This test involves responding to the location of the minute and hour hand on a clock. This test will be performed under single and dual-task conditions. Higher scores indicate better performance. | Baseline (1st novel slip, trip week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in dual-task cost | Dual-task motor and cognitive cost will be calculated using the formula- [(Dual-task performance- Single Task performance)/Single task performance]. This will be calculated for dual-task performance during intentional postural sway, reactive balance control and gait conditions. Lower cost indicates better performance. | Baseline (week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in visuomotor task | This test involves continuous tracking of a cyclic moving target on the screen using a motion sensor placed on the head. Higher scores indicates poor performance. | Baseline (week 1), immediate post-training (repeated perturbation training session, week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Fractional anisotropy | White matter integrity tested using magnetic resonance imaging | Baseline (week 1) |
| Gray matter volume | Gray matter volume tested using magnetic resonance imaging | Baseline (week 1) |
| Functional connectivity Z score | Resting state functional connectivity using magnetic resonance imaging | Baseline (week 1) |
| Balance evaluation Systems test |
consists of 36 different performances which will be used to determine different balance control domains such as self-initiated performances and reactive balance control, and gait functions. Each item in the scale ranges from 0 to 3 indicating severe impairment to no impairment amounting to a total score of 108 converted to percentage. Higher scores indicate better performance. |
| Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Berg Balance scale | Assess static and dynamic balance. This scale consists of the participant transferring from one chair to another, reaching forward, stepping up and down from a stepping stool, standing with eyes closed and open, one leg standing. It is a 14-item scale with each item score ranging from 0-4. Performance on the scale will be calculated on a total of 56. Less than 45 will indicate greater risk of falling. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Cognitive Timed up and Go test | Time taken to walk 3 meters as quickly as possible while concurrently performing a counting backward task. Higher scores indicate poor performance. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Muscle Strength | The isokinetic dynamometer for determining lower extremity (hip, knee, and ankle) muscle strength bilaterally. Muscle strength will be measured via Newton, i.e., force applied to perform the movement pre training compared to post training. Higher values indicate higher muscle strength. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Range of Motion | The electronic goniometer to determine range of motion of both lower extremities (hip, knee, and ankle) will be used. Range of motion will be noted in degrees and higher values indicate higher muscle strength. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Fukuda step test | Participant is asked to march (50 to 100 steps) in place with eyes closed and arms extended to 90° angle in front of the body. After completing 50 steps, if the body is rotated more than 30° angle will indicate vestibular weakness to the side rotated. Similarly, after performing 100 steps, an angle greater than 45° will indicate unilateral vestibular weakness of the side to which the body is rotated. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Head thrust test | Examiner rotates subjects head 15-30 degrees from the center and then rapidly rotates to the other side while asking the participant to look at examiner's eyes. If any nystagmus (oscillation of eyeballs horizontally or vertically) is noticed, it will indicate vestibular weakness. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Postural Sway | This test quantitatively assesses the participant's ability to use visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular inputs for maintaining their posture in quiet standing. The test will be administered under single and dual-task (simultaneous performance of motor and cognitive tasks) conditions. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| Change in physical activity level (Questionnaires) | Questionnaires such as Physical Activity Scale for elderly and activity specific balance confidence scale will be self-reported by the participant. Activity specific balance confidence scale consists of 16 items, and each item score ranges from 0-100. The total score with 0 confidence indicates no confidence and 100 with complete confidence. | Baseline (week 1) and 4 weeks of training |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |