Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes of coverage of soft tissue defects of leg and foot by modified sural flap versus anterolateral thigh flap
The leg and foot contain a thin subcutaneous layer and few muscles, thus the tibia and tendons can easily become exposed due to trauma. Therefore leg and foot injuries are often associated with a loss of soft tissues and exposed fractures.
one of the following reconstructive options are chosen:
The sural flap acts as an axial flap and has 3 sources of nutrition,the vascular plexus of the deep fascia, the medial superficial sural artery which follows the medial sural nerve and the arteries that follow the minor saphenous vein. Venous return is ensured by the minor saphenous vein which may be used as a distal pedicle to provide reverse flow.
sural flap has the advantages of easy and quick harvesting without sacrificing major arteries and can be done in one stage operation.
In the other hand,Since introduction of the anterolateral thigh flap in 1984 by Song et al it has gained widespread popularity, especially in Asian countries, where it has replaced the radial forearm flap as being the workhorse in head and neck surgery.
Anterolateral thigh flaps have been introduced also in lower extremity reconstruction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| modified sural flap | Active Comparator | modified sural flap used to cover soft tissue defect around ankle |
|
| anterolateral thigh flap | Active Comparator | anterolateral thigh flap used to cover soft tissue defect around ankle |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| flaps | Procedure | coverage of soft tissue defect around ankle |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Viability of the flap | Viability of flap detected by numbers of flap survived in each group | baseline |
| Size of defect covered(size of the flap) | Detected by measuring the length and width in cms | Baseline |
| Resistance to infection | Detected by numbers of flabs in each group that resist infection | Baseline |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• patients aging 5 to 70 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Peripheral vascular disease
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ahmed faisal | Contact | 01095074338 | ahmedfaysel@med.sohag.edu.eg |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31785835 | Background | Noaman HH, Soroor YO. Foot salvage using microsurgical free muscle flaps in severely crushed foot with soft tissue defects. Injury. 2019 Dec;50 Suppl 5:S17-S20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.040. Epub 2019 Oct 23. | |
| 21351140 | Background | Battiston B, Antonini A, Tos P, Daghino W, Massazza G, Riccio M. Microvascular reconstructions of traumatic-combined tissue loss at foot and ankle level. Microsurgery. 2011 Mar;31(3):212-7. doi: 10.1002/micr.20863. Epub 2011 Feb 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013524 | Surgical Flaps |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019738 | Surgically-Created Structures |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided