Unknown statusInterventionalNot ApplicableLast updated May 20, 2021

A Comparative Trial of a Minimal-invasive Technique Versus Open Arthrodesis in the Treatment of Midfoot Arthritis

Can Reverse Oblique Distal Minimal-invasive Osteotomies Replace Arthrodesis of the Tarsometatarsal Joints? - a Prospective, Comparative Trial of 50 Patients

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04894578
Lead Sponsor: Kantonsspital BadenOTHER
Brief Summary: Group A: Patients suffering from midfoot arthritis after failed prior conservative therapy who undergo a reverse distal metatarsal minimal-invasive osteotomy Group B: Patients suffering from midfoot arthritis after failed prior conservative therapy who undergo a fusion of one or more midfoot (tarsometatarsal) joints
Study Type

Status

Overall Status: Unknown status
Start Date: May 14, 2021Actual
Primary Completion Date: Dec 31, 2023Estimated
Completion Date: Dec 31, 2024Estimated

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: May 11, 2021
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: May 18, 2021
First Posted: May 20, 2021Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: May 18, 2021
Last Update Posted: May 20, 2021Actual
Last Verified: May 2021

NCT07486596Active, not recruiting

Arthroscopic Versus Open Subtalar Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Subtalar Arthritis

NCT04937764Unknown status

Interest of Medial Partial Arthrodesis in Degenerative and Inflammatory Damage of Lisfranc Tarsometatarsal Joint.

NCT02449096Unknown status

Comparison of the Results of Complex Ankle Fractures Treated With and Without Ankle Arthroscopy

NCT00921076Unknown status

Gait Analysis of Ankle Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis

NCT00552136Active, not recruiting

Canadian Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Surgical Treatment of Ankle Arthritis Outcome Study

NCT01413061Completed

Study of Subtalar Arthrodesis Using AlloStem® Versus Autologous Bone Graft