Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Navarra | OTHER |
| Medical University of Vienna | OTHER |
| Assign Data Management and Biostatistics GmbH | OTHER |
| WiSP GmbH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
As optimal tolerance is the key for developing new treatments for the very elderly population, the aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of isatuximab in combination with lenalidomide+dexamethasone (Rd) versus Rd only in very elderly patients aged 70 years or older. ln sum, a clear and clinically highly relevant benefit is expected with the isatuximab-based triple combination compared to the standard Rd doublet.
The treatment goals in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are similar to those in younger patients: rapid and long-lasting symptom control, deep response and durable remissions as well as increased survival are at the forefront, similar to therapy goals in younger patients. Elderly patients frequently present with comorbidities, reduced treatment tolerance and greater frequency of treatment discontinuations. Hence, treatment needs to be adapted to the specific needs of this patient population.
ln the recent decade lenalidomide-based therapies have been established as effective treatment modalities in elderly patients. In elderly patients lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd) is one of the most frequently used treatment regimens, which is effective and well tolerated.
MM is a high unmet medical need and as a result, several agents are currently under clinical investigation in MM. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are one of the most promising groups of drugs in development in the treatment of MM with several of them demonstrating activity in this disease. lsatuximab is a highly effective monoclonal antibody with an excellent activity and tolerance profile, active as single agent therapy in patients with multiple prior lines of treatment.
Presently several trials with isatuximab-lenalidomide containing treatment regimens are ongoing. The expected benefits of adding isatuximab to Rd over Rd alone in very elderly patients seem to outweigh possible risks by far.
A greater depth of response is anticipated including greater number of MRD (minimal residual disease) negative patients, higher response rates, and longer progression free survival.
Risk conferred with the addition of isatuximab are mainly restricted to a roughly 40% rate of infusion reactions, which usually are seen at the first infusion only. ln addition, there is an increased risk for grade 4 leukopenia, grade 2 and 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 infection and fatigue.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRd followed by IR | Experimental | Induction: 8 cycles isatuximab+lenalidomide+dexamethasone; Maintenance: up to 24 cylces isatuximab+lenalidomide |
|
| Rd followed by R | Other | Induction: 8 cycles lenalidomide+dexamethasone; Maintenance: up to 24 cylces lenalidomide |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isatuximab-Irfc 20 MG/ML [Sarclisa] | Drug | Induction: 10mg/kg on day 1,8,15,22 in cycle 1, subsequently on day 1, 15; every 28 days (q28 days) Maintenance: 10mg/kg, day1, q28 days until progression or intolerance but for a maximum of 24 cycles from start of maintenance |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients with MRD (minimal residual disease) negativity (defined by NGF [next generation flow] at 10^-5) after end of induction treatment in the two arms. | To demonstrate the benefit of isatuximab in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone followed by isatuximab and lenalidomide maintenance therapy in changing the proportion of patients with MRD negativity as compared to lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). | After 8 months of induction treatment (8 cycles, each cyle is 28 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of patients with response to study treatment | Effect of treatment on Overall Response Rate (ORR) including patients with Partial Response (PR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) and Complete Response (CR) as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria in each arm. | After 32 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 70 years
Able to provide written informed consent in accordance with federal, local, and institutional guidelines
Patients must have newly diagnosed, symptomatic multiple myeloma with evidence of measurable disease (assessed within 21 days prior to randomization)
No prior treatment for multiple myeloma
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2
Patients at cardiac risk (NYHA >ll) or pre-existing coronary heart disease, or any other clinically relevant cardiac complication) should be scheduled for a baseline ECHO and can only be included if the LVEF is >40%
Adequate organ and bone marrow function within the 21 days prior to randomization defined by:
Exclusion Criteria:
ECOG status >2
Patients unlikely to tolerate Rd
Waldenström macroglobulinemia
POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes)
Plasma cell leukemia (> 2.0 x 10^9/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential)
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Smoldering Myeloma and MGUS
Second malignancy within the past 5 years except:
History of or current amyloidosis
Glucocorticoid therapy within the 14 days prior to randomization that exceeds an accumulated dose of 160 mg dexamethasone or 1000 mg prednisone
Extended field radio therapy (more than 3 fields) within the 21 days prior to randomization
Contraindication to isatuximab, dexamethasone, lenalidomide or any of the required concomitant drugs or supportive treatments, including hypersensitivity to antiviral drugs
Active congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III or IV), symptomatic ischemia, conduction abnormalities uncontrolled by conventional intervention, acute diffuse infiltrative pulmonary disease, pericardial disease, or myocardial infarction within 4 months prior to enrolment
Active infection within the 14 days prior to randomization requiring systemic antibiotics and/or antiviral therapy
Uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes despite medication
Significant neuropathy (Grade 2 with pain or Grade 3 or higher) within the 14 days prior to randomization
Known cirrhosis
Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) seropositivity or active hepatitis C or hepatitis B infection (subjects with past hepatitis B virus [HBV] infection or resolved HBV infection defined as having a negative HBsAg test and a positive antibody to hepatitis B core antigen [anti HBc] antibody test are eligible; subjects positive for hepatitis C virus [HCV] antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction [PCR] is negative for HCV RNA.)
Participation in another interventional study within the 28 days prior to randomization
Major surgery (except kyphoplasty) within the 28 days prior to randomization
Any other clinically significant medical disease or social condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, may interfere with protocol adherence or a subject's ability to give informed consent, be compliant with study procedures, or provide accurate information.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Heinz Ludwig | Wilhelminen Cancer Research Institute, Clinic Ottakring | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bezirkskrankenhaus Kufstein, Innere Medizin, Interne II u. onkologische Tagesklinik | Kufstein | 6330 | Austria | |||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31427722 | Background | Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Meuleman N, Belch A, Mohty M, Chen WM, Kim K, Zamagni E, Rodriguez-Otero P, Renwick W, Rose C, Tempescul A, Boyle E, Manier S, Attal M, Moreau P, Macro M, Leleu X, Lorraine Chretien M, Ludwig H, Guo S, Sturniolo M, Tinel A, Silvia Monzini M, Costa B, Houck V, Hulin C, Yves Mary J. A simplified frailty scale predicts outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in the FIRST (MM-020) trial. Leukemia. 2020 Jan;34(1):224-233. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0539-0. Epub 2019 Aug 19. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Sponsor | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Sanofi | INDUSTRY |
Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two arms. Randomization will be stratified by the simplified frailty scale (Facon et al, Leukemia 2020) result nonfrail or frail.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lenalidomide | Drug | Induction: 25mg*, day 1-21, every 28 days (q28 days); Maintenance: 5-10mg, day 1-21, q28 days (according to individual tolerance) until progression or intolerance but for a maximum of 24 cycles from start of maintenance *) for patients with moderate renal impairment (30≤ GFR (MDRD formula) < 50 mL/min) starting dose is 10 mg |
|
| Dexamethasone Oral | Drug | Induction: Patients aged <75 years: 40mg, once weekly; Patients aged ≥75 years: 20mg, once weekly |
|
| Progression-free Survival | Effectiveness of treatments on Progression-free survival (PFS) | After 44 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up) |
| Overall Survival | Effectiveness of treatments on Overall Survival (OS) | After 44 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up) |
| Effectiveness of treatments on MRD negativity | To evaluate the proportion of patients with MRD negativity (defined by NGF [next generation flow] at 10^-5) after 12 months (13 cycles) of maintenance treatment. | After 20 months (8 months of induction treatment and 12 months of maintenance treatemnent) |
| Effectiveness of treatments on preventing progressive disease | To evaluate the Time to Progression (TTP) in each arm. | After 44 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up) |
| Progression-free Survival in different high-risk cytogenetic populations | Effectiveness of treatment on PFS in high risk cytogenetic populations defined as patients carrying a) del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) in each arm and b) the same aberrations plus amp1q21. | After 44 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up) |
| Duration of response | Length of time between response and progression or death. | After 44 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up) |
| Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Safety and tolerability) | Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events as assessed by NCI-CTCAE Version 5.0. | After 32 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment) |
| Changes in quality of life (QoL) using general questionnaire European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) Core 30 (C 30) (EORTC-QLQ-C30) | Changes in quality of life will be analyzed by using the cancer patient-specific questionnaire EORTC-QLQ-C30. | After 32 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment) |
| Changes of general health status using questionnaire EQ (EuroQol) 5 dimension (5D) 5 level (5L) (EQ-5D-5L) | Changes in general health status will be analyzed by using the questionnaires EQ-5D-5L. QoL. | After 32 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment) |
| Changes in quality of life (QoL) using multiple myeloma specific questionnaire EORTC-QLQ Myeloma (MY) 20 (EORTC-QLQ-MY20) | Changes in quality of life will be analyzed by using the multiple myeloma-specific questionnaire EORTC-QLQ-MY20. | After 32 months (8 months of induction treatment and a maximum of 24 months of maintenance treatment) |
| Progression-free survival after second line therapy | Influence of potential second line therapy on Progression-free Survival | After end of study treatment until 12 months of follow up as a minimum (until LPLV) |
| LKH Hochsteiermark - Leoben, Abt. f. Innere Medizin, Haemato-Onkologie |
| Leoben |
| 8700 |
| Austria |
| Univ.Klinikum Krems, Klin. Abt. f. Innere Medizin 2 | Mitterweng | 3500 | Austria |
| PMU Salzburg: Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin III | Salzburg | 5020 | Austria |
| Univ.-Klinikum St. Pölten, Innere Medizin 1 | Sankt Pölten | 3100 | Austria |
| Krankenhaus d. Barmh. Schwestern Wien, 1. Med. Abteilung, Onkologie und Hämatologie | Vienna | 1060 | Austria |
| Hanusch Krankenhaus der Österreichischen Gesundheitskasse, 3. Med. Abteilung | Vienna | 1140 | Austria |
| Klinik Ottakring, 1.Med.Abt., Zentrum f. Onkologie, Haematologie und Palliativmedizin | Vienna | 1160 | Austria |
| Krankenhaus Zams, Innere Medizin, Internistische Onkologie-Haematologie | Zams | 6511 | Austria |
| General Hospital of Athens "Evangelismos", Hematology Clinic | Athens | 10676 | Greece |
| General Hospital of Athens "Alexandra, Plasma Cell Dyscrasias Unit | Athens | 11528 | Greece |
| Anticancer Hospital of Thessaloniki "Theageneio", Hematology | Thessaloniki | 54639 | Greece |
| University Clinical Center of Serbia, Clinic for Hematology | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| University Clinical Center Kragujevac, Clinic for Hematology | Kragujevac | 34000 | Serbia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D054219 | Neoplasms, Plasma Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000599209 | isatuximab |
| D000077269 | Lenalidomide |
| D003907 | Dexamethasone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010797 | Phthalimides |
| D010795 | Phthalic Acids |
| D000146 | Acids, Carbocyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D010881 | Piperidones |
| D010880 | Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D054833 | Isoindoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D011246 | Pregnadienetriols |
| D011245 | Pregnadienes |
| D011278 | Pregnanes |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D013259 | Steroids, Fluorinated |
Not provided
Not provided