Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Sponsor decision
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to compare the accuracy of a noninvasive measurement of oxygen saturation compared to reference values obtained by a laboratory blood gas analyzer. Subgroups will be analyzed by skin pigmentation and self-identified race/ethnicity information.
Study procedures follow ISO-80601-2-61:2011 standard requirements for basic safety and essential performance of pulse oximeter equipment. Arterial blood samples will be collected from subjects while undergoing a controlled desaturation procedure wherein the concentration of oxygen inhaled is slowly reduced until the subject's arterial oxygen concentration is approximately 70%.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pulse oximeters | Experimental | All subjects who are enrolled into the test group and participate in data collection receive the noninvasive pulse oximeter sensors. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVSENSOR00050 | Device | Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Accuracy of INVSENSOR00050 | Performance of the INVSENSOR00050 sensor will be determined by comparing the noninvasive oxygen saturation measurement (SpO2) of the pulse oximeter sensors to the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) value obtained from a reference blood sample and calculating the accuracy root mean square (ARMS) value. The ARMS value will be reported as % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin. | 1-5 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the Median Bias Between Subgroups for the INVSENSOR00050 Sensor | The secondary outcome is to perform equivalence tests between identified subgroups based on skin pigmentation and/or self-identified race/ethnicity. Since the pulse oximeter displays saturation in integer values, equivalence limits will be set to ± 1% SpO2. A TOST procedure using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to test the hypothesis that the median biases of the INVSENSOR00050 sensor from two pigmentation subgroups (Light and Dark) were equivalent within ± 1% SpO2. The TOST procedure provides a p-value indicating whether the two measures are equivalent if the p-value is less than 0.05. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Masimo Corporation | Irvine | California | 92618 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pulse Oximeters | All subjects who are enrolled into the test group and participate in data collection receive the noninvasive pulse oximeter sensors. INVSENSOR00050: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor RD SET SpO2: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Pulse Oximeters | All subjects who are enrolled into the test group and participate in data collection receive the noninvasive pulse oximeter sensors. INVSENSOR00050: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor RD SET SpO2: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) Accuracy of INVSENSOR00050 | Performance of the INVSENSOR00050 sensor will be determined by comparing the noninvasive oxygen saturation measurement (SpO2) of the pulse oximeter sensors to the arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) value obtained from a reference blood sample and calculating the accuracy root mean square (ARMS) value. The ARMS value will be reported as % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin. | Posted | Number | % of oxygen saturated hemoglobin | 1-5 hours |
|
1 to 5 hours
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Pulse Oximeters | All subjects who are enrolled into the test group and participate in data collection receive the noninvasive pulse oximeter sensors. INVSENSOR00050: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor RD SET SpO2: Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood vessel was potentially damaged during venipuncture. | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed Alghazi | Masimo Corporation | 949-297-7437 | aalghazi@masimo.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 21, 2021 | Apr 28, 2022 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| RD SET SpO2 |
| Device |
Noninvasive pulse oximeter sensor |
|
| 1-5 hours |
| Comparison of the Median Bias Between Subgroups for the RD SET SpO2 Sensors | The secondary outcome is to perform equivalence tests between identified subgroups based on skin pigmentation and/or self-identified race/ethnicity. Since the pulse oximeter displays saturation in integer values, equivalence limits will be set to ± 1% SpO2. A TOST procedure using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to test the hypothesis that the median biases of the RD SET SpO2 sensor from two pigmentation subgroups (Light and Dark) were equivalent within ± 1 %SpO2. The TOST procedure provides a p-value indicating whether the two measures are equivalent if the p-value is less than 0.05. | 1-5 hours |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Self reported race/ethnicity | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Comparison of the Median Bias Between Subgroups for the INVSENSOR00050 Sensor | The secondary outcome is to perform equivalence tests between identified subgroups based on skin pigmentation and/or self-identified race/ethnicity. Since the pulse oximeter displays saturation in integer values, equivalence limits will be set to ± 1% SpO2. A TOST procedure using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to test the hypothesis that the median biases of the INVSENSOR00050 sensor from two pigmentation subgroups (Light and Dark) were equivalent within ± 1% SpO2. The TOST procedure provides a p-value indicating whether the two measures are equivalent if the p-value is less than 0.05. | Due to early termination of the study, the subgroups were not well balanced for secondary outcomes analysis due to lack for female subjects, especially dark skin pigmented females. Hence the analysis is not fully representative. However, the equivalence analysis was conducted for the two pigment subgroups with available data. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of SpO2 | 1-5 hours |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Comparison of the Median Bias Between Subgroups for the RD SET SpO2 Sensors | The secondary outcome is to perform equivalence tests between identified subgroups based on skin pigmentation and/or self-identified race/ethnicity. Since the pulse oximeter displays saturation in integer values, equivalence limits will be set to ± 1% SpO2. A TOST procedure using the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test was used to test the hypothesis that the median biases of the RD SET SpO2 sensor from two pigmentation subgroups (Light and Dark) were equivalent within ± 1 %SpO2. The TOST procedure provides a p-value indicating whether the two measures are equivalent if the p-value is less than 0.05. | Due to early termination of the study, the subgroups were not well balanced for secondary outcomes analysis due to lack for female subjects, especially dark skin pigmented females. Hence the analysis is not fully representative. However, the equivalence analysis was conducted for the two pigment subgroups with available data. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of SpO2 | 1-5 hours |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 1 |
| 38 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided