Clinical Outcomes and Safety of a Non-hormonal Medical Device Versus a Sham Device on the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA) in Post-Menopausal Women Who Have Failed, Refused, or Are Contraindicated for Hormone Therapy
Clinical Outcomes and Safety of a Non-hormonal Medical Device Versus a Sham Device on the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA) in Post-Menopausal Women Who Have Failed, Refused, or Are Contraindicated for Hormone Therapy
Randomized (1:1), double-blind, sham-controlled, 2-arm parallel study comparing effectiveness and safety of non-hormonal medical device versus sham device to treat VVA in post-menopausal women.
After screening and baseline assessment, participants, ages 21 to 65 years of age, will be randomized and followed for a 12-week intervention period. After the primary endpoint evaluation at week 12, each participant in both arms will immediately commence an open label period using an Active device for week 13 to 1 year to collect further effectiveness and safety data.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: